Advertisement

Pet Food Communication: Notes on the Crisis of Naturalism

  • Roberta BartolettiEmail author
  • Giulia Cecchelin
Chapter
Part of the Biosemiotics book series (BSEM, volume 17)

Abstract

Since the beginning of the second half of the twentieth century, an important change has been taking place in western society regarding the relationship between humans and animals – i.e. pets, wild animals and livestock. We wonder if changes in progress can be interpreted as a crisis in naturalism, and we will try to reflect on whether, and how, the relationship of naturalism with other ontologies, first of all animism, can be used as a lens in order to understand the sense and direction of the ongoing processes. We will focus on domestic animals and pet food, because food represents a mediator of extraordinary relevance in human-animal relations. We analysed the packaging of a collection of pet food products which are currently on the market in Italy and Europe. The body of material chosen was examined in order to find answers to the following research questions: What pet food values are being promoted by the producer? What kind of consumer, either human or animal, is being profiled? And what kind of human/animal relationship is being recognised and promoted by the pet food producer? The human-animal relation which is prevailingly recognised and appreciated by pet food producers is one of affectionate and responsible control, while the dialogic relationship, which still appears, is both as radically innovative as it is minor.

References

  1. Arluke, A., & Sanders, R. C. (1996). Regarding animals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bartoletti, R., & Cecchelin, G. (2016). Narrazioni e pratiche della natura in città: gli orti urbani tra cortili e foreste domestiche. Studi Culturali, 1, 39–60.  https://doi.org/10.1405/83211.Google Scholar
  3. Basso Fossali, P. (2008a). La promozione dei valori. Semiotica della comunicazione e dei consumi. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
  4. Basso Fossali, P. (2008b). Vissuti di significazione. Temi per una semiotica viva. Pisa: ETS.Google Scholar
  5. De Marinis, M. (1982). Semiotica del teatro, L’analisi testuale dello spettacolo. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar
  6. DeMello, M. (2012). Animals and society: An introduction to human-animal studies. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Descola, P. (2005). Par-delà nature et culture. Paris: Gallimard. English Edition: Descola, P. (2013). Beyond nature and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Descola, P. (2010). Diversité des natures, Diversité des cultures. Paris: Bayard.Google Scholar
  9. Eco, U. (1979). Lector in fabula. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar
  10. Elam, K. (1980). The semiotics of theatre and drama. London: Methuen & Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fontanille, J., & Zilberberg, C. (1998). Tension et signification. Liegi: Mardaga.Google Scholar
  12. Franklin, A. (1999). Animals and modern cultures. A sociology of human-animal relations in modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Franklin, A. (2002). Nature and social theory. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Greco, M. (2011). Vademecum del semiologo. In P. Basso Fossali (Ed.), La semiotica a prova d’esperienza. Sperimentazioni didattiche e metodologie d’analisi (pp. 349–362). Milan: Unicopli.Google Scholar
  15. Greimas, A. J., & Courtés, J. (Eds.). (1979). Sémiotique. Dictionnaire raisonné de la théorie du langage (Vol. I). Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
  16. Ingold, T. (Ed.). (1988). What is an animal? London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
  17. Latour, B. (1999). Politiques de la nature. Paris: La Découverte & Syros. English edition: Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature. How to bring the sciences into democracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Luhmann, N. (2002). Einführung in die Systemtheorie. Heidelberg: Carl-Auer. English Edition: Luhmann, N. (2013). Introduction to systems theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  19. Macnaghten, P., & Urry, J. (1995). Towards a sociology of nature. Sociology, 29(2), 203–230.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038595029002002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marrone, G. (2011). Addio alla natura. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
  21. Peirce, C. S. (1866–1913). Collected papers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Tester, K. (1992). Animals and society. The humanity of animal right. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Williams, R. (1980). Ideas of nature. In R. Williams problems in materialism and culture (pp. 67–85). London: Verso.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Urbino “Carlo Bo”UrbinoItaly
  2. 2.Independent ResearcherBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations