Advertisement

Multi-objective Genetic Algorithm for Interior Lighting Design

  • Alice PlebeEmail author
  • Mario Pavone
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10710)

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel system to help in the design of interior lighting. It is based on multi-objective optimization of the key criteria involved in lighting design: the respect of a given target level of illuminance, uniformity of lighting, and electrical energy saving. The proposed solution integrates the 3D graphic software Blender, used to reproduce the architectural space and to simulate the effect of illumination, and the genetic algorithm NSGA-II. This solution offers advantages in design flexibility over previous related works.

Keywords

Lighting design Genetic algorithm Blender 

References

  1. 1.
    Andersen, M., Gagne, J.M., Kleindienst, S.: Interactive expert support for early stage full-year daylighting design: a user’s perspective on Lightsolve. Autom. Constr. 35, 338–352 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baltes, H. (ed.): Inverse Source Problems in Optics. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1978)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Caldas, L.: Generation of energy-efficient architecture solutions applying GENE_ARCH: an evolution-based generative design system. Adv. Eng. Inform. 22, 59–70 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Caldas, L.: Painting with light: an interactive evolutionary system for daylighting design. Building and Environment (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.07.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cassol, F., Schneider, P.S., França, F.H., Neto, A.J.S.: Multi-objective optimization as a new approach to illumination design of interior spaces. Build. Environ. 46, 331–338 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deb, K., Agrawal, S., Pratap, A., Meyarivan, T.: A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II. In: International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving From Nature, pp. 849–858 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fesanghary, M., Asadi, S., Geem, Z.W.: Design of low-emission and energy-efficient residential buildings using a multi-objective optimization algorithm. Build. Environ. 49, 245–250 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fortin, F.A., De Rainville, F.M., Gardner, M.A., Parizeau, M., Gagné, C.: DEAP: evolutionary algorithms made easy. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 13, 2171–2175 (2012)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Futrell, B., Ozelkan, E.C., Brentrup, D.: Optimizing complex building design for annual daylighting performance and evaluation of optimization algorithms. Energy Build. 92, 234–245 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gagne, J., Andersen, M.: A generative facade design method based on daylighting performance goals. J. Build. Performance Simul. 5, 141–154 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gordon, G.: Interior Lighting for Designers. Wiley, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grasso, G., Plebe, A.: Conceptual integrity without concepts. In: International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, pp. 422–427. KSI Research Inc. and Knowledge Systems Institute, Pittsburgh (PA) (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Janikow, C.Z., Michalewicz, Z.: An experimental comparison of binary and floating point representations in genetic algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pp. 31–36 (1991)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kawai, J., Painter, J.S., Cohen, M.F.: Radioptimization: goal based rendering. In: Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pp. 147–154 (1993)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Larson, G.W., Shakespeare, R.: Rendering with Radiance: The Art and Science of Lighting Visualization. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1997)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee, K.S., Geem, Z.W.: A new structural optimization method based on the harmony search algorithm. Comput. Struct. 82, 781–798 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Livingston, J.: Designing with Light: The Art, Science, and Practice of Architectural Lighting Design. John Wiley, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Madias, E.N.D., Kontaxis, P.A., Topalis, F.V.: Application of multi-objective genetic algorithms to interior lighting optimization. Energy Build. 125, 66–74 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Moylan, K., Ross, B.J.: Interior illumination design using genetic programming. In: Johnson, C., Carballal, A., Correia, J. (eds.) EvoMUSART 2015. LNCS, vol. 9027, pp. 148–160. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16498-4_14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Patow, G., Pueyo, X.: A survey of inverse rendering problems. Comput. Graphics Forum 22, 663–687 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Plebe, A., Grasso, G.: Particle physics and polyedra proximity calculation for hazard simulations in large-scale industrial plants. In: American Institute of Physics Conference Proceedings, pp. 090003-1–090003-4 (2016)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rapone, G., Saro, O.: Optimisation of curtain wall facades for office buildings by means of PSO algorithm. Energy Build. 45, 189–196 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sansoni, P., Farini, A., Mercatelli, L. (eds.): Sustainable Indoor Lighting. Springer, Berlin (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6633-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schoeneman, C., Dorsey, J., Smits, B., Arvo, J., Greenberg, D.: Painting with light. In: Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pp. 143–146 (1993)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shea, K., Sedgwick, A., Antonuntto, G.: Multicriteria optimization of paneled building envelopes using ant colony optimization. In: Smith, I.F.C. (ed.) EG-ICE 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4200, pp. 627–636. Springer, Heidelberg (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1007/11888598_56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Turrin, M., von Buelow, P., Stouffs, R.: Design explorations of performance driven geometry in architectural design using parametric modeling and genetic algorithms. Adv. Eng. Inform. 25, 656–675 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Villa, C., Labayrade, R.: Multi-objective optimisation of lighting installations taking into account user preferences - a pilot study. Lighting Res. Technol. 45, 176–196 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and Computer ScienceUniversity of CataniaCataniaItaly

Personalised recommendations