Advertisement

Inquiry While Being in Relation: Flâneurial Walking as a Creative Research Method

  • Elsa Lenz Kothe
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Movement across Education, the Arts and the Social Sciences book series (PSMAEASS)

Abstract

The flâneur is investigated as a metaphor while considering how walking as a creative research method invites sensorial experience and functions as a relational and place-making practice. In order to consider the generativity of the flâneur in relation to current scholarship, I draw on researchers who utilize walking methods and practices in their research methodologies. Walking brings researchers in relation to emplaced historical narratives that address social injustices, such as colonizing events on particular lands (Veronesi and Gemeinboeck 2009). Through “mindful walking” practices (Jung 2014) “place-as-route” and “place-as-event” (Pink 2007) engage the ongoing process of place-making, attaching meaning to spaces so that sensory-based relational wanderings become affective, storied, and personal places. As a research practice, walking is a shared mode between research, artistic, educational, and flaneurial practices, all activated in everyday ambulation that brings researchers into relation.

Keywords

Flâneur Sensorial Walking as research method Relational Relationality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thank you to Amy Chaloupka for her generous reading and thoughtful suggestions for this chapter. Thank you also to Rita Irwin and Lexi Lasczik Cutcher for their suggestions and guidance in the writing process.

References

  1. Bassett, K. (2004). Walking as an aesthetic practice and a critical tool: Some psychogeographic experiments. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 28(3), 397–410.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0309826042000286965 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benjamin, W. (1973). Charles Baudelaire: A lyric poet in the era of high capitalism. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
  3. Birkerts, S. (1982). Walter Benjamin, flâneur: A flanerie. The Iowa Review, 13(3/4), 164–179.Google Scholar
  4. Boutin, A. (2012). Rethinking the flaneur: Flanerie and the senses. Dix-Neuf, 16(2), 124–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dobson, S. (2002). The urban pedagogy of Walter Benjamin: Lessons for the 21st century, part 2. London: Goldsmith’s College, Centre for Urban and Community Research.Google Scholar
  6. Elkin, L. (2016, July 29). A tribute to female flâneurs: The women who reclaimed our city streets. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2016/jul/29/female-flaneur-women-reclaim-streets.
  7. Horodner, S. (2002). Walk ways. Independent Curators International.Google Scholar
  8. Ingold, T. (2004). Culture on the ground: The world perceived through the feet. Journal of Material Culture, 9(3), 315–340.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183504046896 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Irwin, R. L. (2006). Walking to create an aesthetic and spiritual currere. Visual Arts Research, 32(1), 75–82.Google Scholar
  10. Jenks, C., & Neves, T. (2000). A walk on the wild side: Urban ethnography meets the Flâneur. Cultural Values, 4(1), 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14797580009367183 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jung, Y. (2014). Mindful walking: The serendipitous journey of community-based ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(5), 621–627.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800413505543 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kuntz, A. M., & Presnall, M. M. (2012). Wandering the tactical: From interview to intraview. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(9), 732–744.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800412453016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. O’Rourke, K. (2013). Walking and mapping: Artists as cartographers. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Pink, S. (2007). Walking with video. Visual Studies, 22(3), 240–252.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860701657142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ruitenberg, C. W. (2012). Learning by walking: Non-formal education as curatorial practice and intervention in public space. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 31(3), 261–275.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2012.683604 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Solnit, R. (2002). Wanderlust: A history of walking. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
  17. Springgay, S. (2011). “The Chinatown Foray” as sensational pedagogy. Curriculum Inquiry, 41(5), 636–656.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2011.00565.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Triggs, V., Irwin, R. L., & Leggo, C. (2014). Walking art: Sustaining ourselves as arts educators. Visual Inquiry, 3(1), 21–34.  https://doi.org/10.1386/vi.3.1.21_1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Veronesi, F., & Gemeinboeck, P. (2009). Mapping footprints: A sonic walkthrough of landscapes and cultures. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 15(3), 359–369.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856509105113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wolff, J. (1985). The invisible flâneuse. Women and the literature of modernity. Theory, Culture & Society, 2(3), 37–46.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276485002003005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elsa Lenz Kothe
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations