“I Had Peopled Else”: Shakespeare’s Queer Natalities and the Reproduction of Race

  • Urvashi Chakravarty


“‘I Had Peopled Else’: Shakespeare’s Queer Natalities and the Reproduction of Race” explores representations of queer natality in four plays by William Shakespeare. This chapter suggests that the queerest child is the child who is altogether absent; thus, representations of anti-natalism and queer natality in these plays reveal the essentially precarious, tenuous nature of reproductive futurity. In so doing, I argue, they also expose the racialized assumptions underwriting the central figure of futurity, the child. If The Tempest and The Merchant of Venice emphasize figures of foreign hyper-fecundity and miscegenation amidst depictions of barrenness and lineal disruption, Titus Andronicus highlights the dangers of legible natality, while A Midsummer Night’s Dream prompts audiences to interrogate the persistent fictions around the promise of natal futurity.



I am indebted to Jennifer Higginbotham and Mark Albert Johnston for their generous feedback on this chapter. I am also grateful to all the participants of the “Queering Childhood” seminar at the 2016 Shakespeare Association of America Meeting for an illuminating conversation, and especially to Amy Eliza Greenstadt, Rachel Prusko, Melissa Welshans, and Lucy Munro for their thoughtful responses to an earlier version of this chapter. All references to Shakespeare ’s plays, unless otherwise noted, follow The Riverside Shakespeare (1997) and appear parenthetically by act, scene, and line numbers.


  1. Adelman, Janet. 2003. Her Father’s Blood: Race, Conversion, and Nation in The Merchant of Venice. Representations 81 (1): 4–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bullokar, John. 1616. An English Expositor. London: John Legatt.Google Scholar
  3. Chakravarty, Urvashi. 2012. Livery, Liberty, and Legal Fictions. English Literary Renaissance 42 (3): 365–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ———. 2016. More Than Kin, Less Than Kind: Similitude, Strangeness, and Early Modern English Homonationalisms. Shakespeare Quarterly 67 (1): 14–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cowell, John. 1607. The Interpreter: or Booke Containing the Signification of Words. Cambridge: John Legate.Google Scholar
  6. Culpeper, Nicholas. 1653. The English Physitian Enlarged. London: Peter Cole.Google Scholar
  7. Edelman, Lee. 2004. No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Florio, John. 1611. Queen Anna’s New World of Words, or Dictionarie of the Italian and English Tongues. London: Melch. Bradwood.Google Scholar
  9. Hall, Kim F. 1992. Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner? Colonization and Miscegenation in The Merchant of Venice. Renaissance Drama 23: 87–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hendricks, Margo. 1996. ‘Obscured by Dreams’: Race, Empire, and Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream. Shakespeare Quarterly 47 (1): 37–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Loomba, Ania. 2016. The Great Indian Vanishing Trick – Colonialism, Property, and the Family in A Midsummer Night’s Dream. In A Feminist Companion to Shakespeare, ed. Dympna Callaghan, 181–205. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Muñoz, José Esteban. 2009. Cruising Utopia: The Then and There of Queer Futurity. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Newman, Karen. 1987. Portia’s Ring: Unruly Women and Structures of Exchange in The Merchant of Venice. Shakespeare Quarterly 38 (1): 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Royster, Francesca T. 2000. White-Limed Walls: Whiteness and Gothic Extremism in Shakespeare’s Titus Andronicus. Shakespeare Quarterly 51 (4): 432–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sanchez, Melissa. 2008. Seduction and Service in The Tempest. Studies in Philology 105 (1): 50–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Shakespeare, William. 2010. The Merchant of Venice. Ed. John Drakakis. London: Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 2011. The Tempest. Ed. Alden T. Vaughan and Virginia Mason Vaughan. London: Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare.Google Scholar
  18. Shin, Hiewon. 2008. Single Parenting, Homeschooling: Prospero, Caliban, Miranda. SEL: Studies in English Literature 1500–1900 48 (2): 373–393.Google Scholar
  19. Wilson, Luke. 2012. Macbeth and the Contingency of Future Persons. Shakespeare Studies 40: 53–62.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Urvashi Chakravarty
    • 1
  1. 1.George Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA

Personalised recommendations