Advertisement

Financial Literacy and the Curricularization of Knowledge

  • Alexander M. Sidorkin
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)

Abstract

The chapter examines the notion of cumulative vs. noncumulative knowledge as it applies to the financial literacy. The mass public education programs may have a tendency to curricularize knowledge, which means shifting knowledge from cumulative, descriptive kinds closer to noncumulative or normative kind. When certain claims cross the border from cumulative, descriptive realm into the noncumulative, normative realm, they become vulnerable to rejection and may compromise large bodies of cumulative knowledge that support the normative claims. We should use the pragmatic and institutionalist epistemological thinking to prevent this from happening. We must know how institutions operate in the real world, and what are the likely unintended consequences of the curricularization of knowledge.

Keywords

Financial literacy Cumulative and non-cumulative knowledge Paranoid consciousness 

References

  1. Berkowitz, A. D. (2004). The social norms approach: Theory, research, and annotated bibliographyhttp://www.alanberkowitz.com/articles/social_norms.pdf
  2. Brinton, C. (1984). Cumulative and noncumulative knowledge. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 18(4), 78–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fernandes, D., Lynch, J. G., Jr., & Netemeyer, R. (2012). A meta-analytic and psychometric investigation of the effect of financial literacy on downstream financial behaviors. In Z. Gürhan-Canli, C. Otnes, & Rui (Juliet) Zhu (Eds.), NA – Advances in consumer research (Vol. 40, pp. 1052–1052). Duluth: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  4. Hofstadter, R. (1964). The paranoid style in American politics. Harpers, November, 2016. Available http://harpers.org/archive/1964/11/the-paranoid-style-in-american-politics
  5. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica. The Econometric Society, 47(2), 263–291.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kupiainen, R. (2010). Finnish media literacy policies and research tendencies within a European Union context. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics, 6(3), 335–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Miller, M., Reichelstein, J., Salas, C., & Zia, B. (2015). Can you help someone become financially capable? A meta-analysis of the literature. The World Bank Research Observer, 30(2), 220–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ralston, S. J. (2010). Can pragmatists be institutionalists? John Dewey joins the non-ideal/ideal theory debate. Human Studies, 33(1), 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. The World Bank. (2016). Responsible finance: Financial capability and consumer protection. http://responsiblefinance.worldbank.org/surveys/users-of-financial-services

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander M. Sidorkin
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.California State UniversitySacramentoUSA
  2. 2.National Research University Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations