Advertisement

Heidegger and the Recovery of Education

  • SunInn YunEmail author
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)

Abstract

Why Heidegger? Heidegger’s work bears on education in multiple ways. His thinking gives reason to think again about human subjectivity and about the nature of knowledge, matters that have a bearing on the substance of the curriculum itself. I propose to draw out these and other implications by selecting three aspects of Heidegger’s work, Dasein, Being-in-the world, and Finitude, for each of which I shall provide an explanation followed by some remarks about its educational import. Heidegger helps us to see the problems in the basic metaphysical assumptions (consciously or unconsciously) rooted in educational theories and practices. In particular, this chapter draws attention to the way modern discourse refers to time in education. Heidegger’s reach account of technology and freedom shall lead us to seek new possibility of subjectivity. Lastly, further questions and some limitations of Heidegger shall be briefly considered.

Keywords

Heidegger Subjectivity Time Education Freedom 

References

  1. Aristotle. (2008). Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aristotle. (2012a). In R. B. Jones (Ed.), The organon: The works of Aristotle on Logic. North Charleston: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.Google Scholar
  3. Aristotle. (2012b). In R. B. Jones (Ed.), The metaphysics. North Charleston: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.Google Scholar
  4. Bonnett, M. (1994). Children’s thinking: Promoting understanding in the primary school. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  5. Bonnett, M. (2004). Retrieving nature: Education for a post-humanist age. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  6. Duarte, E. (2012). Being and learning: A poetic phenomenology of education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gibbs, P. (2012). Heidegger’s contribution to the understanding of work-based studies. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Gur-Ze’ev, I. (2002). Martin Heidegger, transcendence, and the possibility of counter education. In M. Peters (Ed.), Heidegger, education, and modernity. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  9. Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (Gesamtausagbe 2) (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. Heidegger, M. (1966). Discourse on thinking (J. Anderson & E. Freund, Trans.). New York: Harper and row.Google Scholar
  11. Inwood, M. (1997). Heidegger: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Lewis, T. (2013). On study: Giorgio Agamben and educational potentiality. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. May, R. 1996 Heidegger’s hidden sources: East-Asian influences on his work (G. Parkes, Trans.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Rorty, R. (1998, May 3) A master from Germany. New York Times Book Review.https://www.nytimes.com/books/98/05/03/reviews/980503.03rortyt.html.Retrieved 4 Sept 2015.
  15. Standish, P. (1992). Beyond the self: Wittgenstein, Heidegger, and the limits of language. Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
  16. Standish, P. (1997). Heidegger and the technology of further education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 31(3), 439–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Standish, P. (2000). In Freedom’s grip. In P. A. Dhillon & P. Standish (Eds.), Lyotard: Just education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Thomson, I. (2005). Heidegger on Ontotheology: Technology and the politics of education. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yun, S. (2014). Education, freedom, and temporality: A response to Biesta and Säfström’s manifesto. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 48(3), 385–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Incheon National UniversityIncheonSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations