Advertisement

Hernia Surgery in Australasia

  • Andrew Bowker
Chapter

Abstract

Australasia refers to Australia and New Zealand. When considering the Pacific, input was obtained from six of the island countries of the Southern Pacific Ocean. The recent history of hernia repair in this part of the world is described, before examining the current situation, including results of surgeon preferences for repair of the various types of hernia. The wider benefits of videolaparoscopic technology on hernia repair in New Zealand are considered, as well as the effect of the current controversy surrounding the use of mesh in surgery. Finally, the author gives his view on the main cause for postoperative pain in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

References

  1. 1.
    McMahon AJ, et al. Bile duct injury and bile leakage in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 1995;82:307–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schultz L, et al. Laser laparoscopic herniorrhaphy: a clinical trial preliminary results. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1990;1(1):41–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fielding GA. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Aust N Z J Surg. 1995;65:304–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bellis CA. Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy is not a valid procedure. Aust N Z J Surg. 1994;64:295–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liam MSL. The learning curve of totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg. 1996;171(2):281–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kockerling F, et al. Do we need antibiotic prophylaxis in endoscopic inguinal hernia repair? Results of the Herniamed Registry. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:3741–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Update on serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: FDA Safety Communication 2011.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tongaonkar R, et al. Preliminary multicentric trial of cheap indigenous mosquito-net cloth for tension-free hernia repair Indian. J Surg. 2003;65(1).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grant A, EU hernia Trialists Collaboration. Laparoscopic versus open groin hernia repair: meta-analysis of randomised trials based on individual patient data. Hernia. 2002;6(1):2–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sajid MS, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effectiveness of lightweight mesh against heavyweight mesh in influencing the incidence of groin pain following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg. 2013;205(6):726–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Andrew C, et al. Lightweight versus heavyweight mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(8):2126–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Akolekar D, et al. Comparison of recurrence with lightweight mesh composite polypropylene mesh and heavyweight mesh in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: an audit of 1,232 repairs. Hernia. 2008;12(1):39–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Burgmans JP, et al. Long-term results of a randomised double-blinded prospective trial of a lightweight (Ultrapro) versus a heavyweight mesh (Prolene) in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TULP trial). Ann Surg. 2016;263(5):862–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew Bowker
    • 1
  1. 1.Laparoscopy AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations