Theory and Research to Study Principles of Social Cognition and Decision-Making in Adaptive Environmental Governance

  • Daniel A. DeCaroEmail author
  • Craig Anthony (Tony) Arnold
  • Emmanuel Frimpong Boamah
  • Ahjond S. Garmestani


Environmental governance systems must adapt to address increased uncertainty and new social-ecological conditions posed by stressors like climate change. This chapter presents several principles of social cognition and decision-making that influence adaptive governance. The principles are illustrated with examples from six US river basins. Future research opportunities are also outlined.


Adaptive governance Cognition Cooperation Environmental law Legitimacy Social decision making 



This work was developed in part under the Adaptive Water Governance Project, funded by the US National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC) under funding from the US National Science Foundation, NSF DBI-1052875. The views set forth by contributors to this volume represent their own and do not represent the views of any public or private entity the contributor is affiliated with.


  1. Abrams D, Wetherell M, Cochrane S, Hogg MA, Turner JC (1990) Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity, and group polarization. Br J Soc Psychol 29:97–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal A, Ribot J (2014) Are Ostrom’s design principles sufficient for design? Policy Matters 19:111–115Google Scholar
  3. Armitage D (2007) Governance and the commons in a multi-level world. Int J Commons 2(1):7–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnold CA (2004) Working out an environmental ethic: anniversary lessons from Mono Lake. Wyoming Law Rev 4:1–55Google Scholar
  5. Arnold CA (2014) Framing watersheds. In: Kirokawa K (ed) Environmental law and contrasting ideas of nature: a constructivist approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 271–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arnold CA, Gunderson LH (2013) Adaptive law and resilience. Environ Law Rep 43:10426–10443Google Scholar
  7. Arnold CA, Green OO, DeCaro DA, Chase A, Ewa JG (2014) The social-ecological resilience of an easter urban-suburban watershed: the anacostia river basin. Idaho Law Rev 51(1):29–90Google Scholar
  8. Arnstein SR (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Plann 35:216–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bailey K, Grossardt T (2010) Toward structured public involvement: justice, geography and collaborative/geovisual decision support systems. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 100(1):57–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beach LR (1998) Image theory: theoretical and empirical foundations. Routledge, MahwahGoogle Scholar
  11. Benson MH, Llewellyn D, Morrison R, Stone M (2014) Water governance challenges in New Mexico’s Middle Rio Grande Valley: a resilience assessment. Idaho Law Rev 51 (1):195–228.
  12. Berrone P, Gelabert L, Fosfuri A (2009) The impact of symbolic and substantive actions on environmental legitimacy. IESE Business School working paper 778. Accessed 13 Mar 2016
  13. Bingham LB (2009) Collaborative governance: emerging practices and the incomplete legal framework for public and stakeholder voice. J Dispute Resolution 2(2):1–58Google Scholar
  14. Bingham LB (2010) The next generation of administrative law: building the legal infrastructure for collaborative governance. Wisconsin Law Rev 2010(2):297–356Google Scholar
  15. Bingham LB, Nabatchi T, O’Leary R (2005) The new governance: practices and processes for stakeholder and citizen participation in the work of government. Public Adm Rev 65(5):547–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bingham LB, Sandfort J, O’Leary R (2008) Learning to do and doing to learn: teaching managers to collaborate in networks. In: Bingham LB, O’Leary R (eds) Big ideas in collaborative public management. Taylor and Francis, New York, pp 270–286Google Scholar
  17. Birge HE, Allen CR, Craig RK, Garmestani AS, Hamm JA, Babbitt C, Nemec K, Schlager E (2014) Social-ecological resilience and law in the platte river basin. Idaho Law Rev 51(1):229–327Google Scholar
  18. Bowles S (2008) Policies designed for self-interested citizens may undermine “the moral sentiments”: evidence from economic experiments. Science 320:1605–1609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Boykoff MT, Boykoff JM (2004) Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press. Glob Environ Chang 14(2):125–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Brehm SS, Brehm JW (1981) Psychological reactance: a theory of freedom and control. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Bullard RD, Johnson GS (2000) Environmental justice: grassroots activism and its impact on public policy decision making. J Soc Issues 56(3):555–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Castro P (2012) Legal innovation for social change: exploring change and resistance to different types of sustainability laws. Polit Psychol 33(1):105–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Castro P, Batel S (2008) Social representation, change and resistance: on the difficulties of generalizing new norms. Culture & Psychol 14(4):475–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Castro P, Mouro C (2011) Psycho-social processes in dealing with legal innovation in the community: insights from biodiversity conservation. Am J Commun Psychol 47(3-4):362–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chaffin BC, Gunderson LH (2016) Emergence, institutionalization and renewal: rhythms of adaptive governance in complex social-ecological systems. J Environ Manag 165:81–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chaffin BC, Craig RK, Gosnell H (2014a) Resilience, adaptation, and transformation in the Klamath River Basin social-ecological system. Idaho Law Rev 51(1):157–183Google Scholar
  27. Chaffin BC, Gosnell H, Cosens BA (2014b) A decade of adaptive governance scholarship: synthesis and future directions. Ecol Soc 19(3):56. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Chen XP, Pillutla MM, Yao X (2009) Unintended consequences of cooperation inducing and maintaining mechanisms in public goods dilemmas: sanctions and moral appeals. Group Process Intergroup Relat 12(2):241–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Chess C, Purcell K (1999) Public participation and the environment: do we know what works? Environ Sci Technol 33(16):2685–2692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Chokshi N (2015) “Turn off the computer,” Oregon sheriff begs. Stop “tearing each other apart.” Post Nation. In: The Washington Post. Accessed 1 Apr 2016
  31. Clarvis MH, Fatichi S, Allan A, Fuhrer J, Stoffel M, Romerio F, Gaudard L, Burlando P, Beniston M, Xoplaki E, Toreti A (2014) Governing and managing water resources under changing hydro-climatic contexts: the case of the upper Rhone basin. Environ Sci Pol 43:56–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Clement F (2010) Analysing decentralised natural resource governance: proposition for a “politicised” institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Sci 43(2):129–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Cornforth A (2009) Behaviour change: insights for environmental policy making from social psychology and behavioural economics. Policy Q 5(4):21–28Google Scholar
  34. Cosens BA (2013) Legitimacy, adaptation, and resilience in ecosystem management. Ecol Soc 18(1):3. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Cote M, Nightingale AJ (2012) Resilience thinking meets social theory situating social change in socio-ecological systems (SES) research. Prog Hum Geogr 36(4):475–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Craig RK, Garmestani AS, Allen CR, Arnold CA, Birgé H, DeCaro DA, Fremier AK, Gosnell H, Schlager E (2017) Balancing stability and flexibility in adaptive governance: an analysis of tools available in U.S. environmental law. Ecol Soc 22(2):3.
  37. DeCaro DA, Stokes M (2008) Social-psychological principles of community-based conservation and conservancy motivation: attaining goals within an autonomy-supportive environment. Conserv Biol 22(6):1443–1451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. DeCaro DA, Stokes MK (2013) Public participation and institutional fit: a social–psychological perspective. Ecol Soc 18(4):40. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. DeCaro DA, Janssen MA, Lee A (2015) Synergistic effects of voting and enforcement on internalized motivation to cooperate in a resource dilemma. Judgm Decis Mak 10(6):511–537Google Scholar
  40. DeCaro DA, Arnold CA, Boamah EF, Garmestani AS (2017a) Understanding and applying principles of social cognition and decision making in adaptive environmental governance. Ecol Soc 22(1):33.
  41. DeCaro DA, Chaffin BC, Schlager E, Garmestani AS, Ruhl JB (2017b) Legal and institutional foundations of adaptive environmental governance. Ecol Soc 22(1):32.
  42. Dietz T, Ostrom E, Stern PC (2003) The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302:1907–1912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Druschke CG, Hychka KC (2015) Manager perspectives on communication and public engagement in ecological restoration project success. Ecol Soc 20(1):58. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Dunlap RE, McCright AM (2010) Climate change denial: sources, actors, strategies. In: Lever-Tracy C (ed) Routledge handbook of climate change and society. Routledge, London, pp 240–259Google Scholar
  45. Edelman M (1960) Symbols and political quiescence. Am Polit Sci Rev 54(03):695–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Entman RM (2007) Framing bias: media in the distribution of power. J Commun 57(1):163–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Farrell J (2016) Corporate funding and ideological polarization about climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113(1):92–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Gächter S (2007) Conditional cooperation. In: Frey BS, Stutzer A (eds) Economics and psychology: a promising new cross-disciplinary field. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 19–50Google Scholar
  49. Gigerenzer G, Todd PM (1999) Fast and frugal heuristics: the adaptive toolbox. In: Gigerenzer G, Todd PM (eds) Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 2–34Google Scholar
  50. Green OO, Garmestani AS, Allen CR, Gunderson LH, Ruhl JB, Arnold CA, Graham NA, Cosens BA, Angeler DG, Chaffin BC, Holling CS (2015) Barriers and bridges to the integration of social-ecological resilience and law. Front Ecol Environ 13(6):332–337Google Scholar
  51. Gromet DM, Kunreuther H, Larrick RP (2013) Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110(23):9314–9319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Gunderson LH, Garmestani A, Rizzardi KW, Ruhl JB, Light A (2014) Escaping a rigidity trap: governance and adaptive capacity to climate change in the everglades social ecological system Idaho Law Rev 51:127–156Google Scholar
  53. Hardin G (1968) Tragedy of the commons. Science 162(13):1243–1248Google Scholar
  54. Hardisty DJ, Johnson EJ, Weber EU (2010) A dirty word or a dirty world? Attribute framing, political affiliation, and query theory. Psychol Sci 21(1):86–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hilbe C, Traulsen A, Röhl T, Milinski M (2014) Democratic decisions establish stable authorities that overcome the paradox of second-order punishment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111(2):752–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Howard JL (2010) Managing for justice in community-based water planning: a conceptual framework. Environ Conserv 37(3):356–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hunt L, Haider W (2001) Fair and effective decision making in forest management planning. Soc Nat Resour 14:873–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources [IUCN] (2008) Shaping a sustainable future: The IUCN programme 2009–2012. Accessed 31 July 2017
  59. Irvin RA, Stansbury J (2004) Citizen participation in decision making: is it worth the effort? Public Adm Rev 64(1):55–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Johnson-Laird PN (2013) Mental models and cognitive change. J Cognit Psychol 25(2):131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Jung JY, Mellers BA (2016) American attitudes toward nudges. Judgm Decis Mak 11(1):62–74Google Scholar
  62. Kahneman D (2003) A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. Am Psychol 58(9):697–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kelley CP, Mohtadi S, Cane MA, Seager R, Kushnir Y (2015) Climate change in the fertile crescent and implications of the recent Syrian drought. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112(11):3241–3246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kemp R, Schot J, Hoogma R (1998) Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management. Tech Anal Strat Manag 10(2):175–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kim E-H, Lyon TP (2013) Beyond the dichotomy of symbolic versus substantive actions. Acad Manag Proc 1:14398. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Kollmuss A, Agyeman J (2002) Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ Educ Res 8(3):239–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Larson KL, Wiek A, Keeler LW (2013) A comprehensive sustainability appraisal of water governance in Phoenix, AZ. J Environ Manag 116:58–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Leach WD, Sabatier PA (2005) To trust an adversary: integrating rational and psychological models of collaborative policymaking. Am Polit Sci Rev 99(04):491–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Lee VK, Harris LT (2013) How social cognition can inform social decision making. Front Neurosci 7(259):1–13Google Scholar
  70. Lever-Tracy C (ed) (2010) Routledge handbook of climate change and society. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  71. Levine JM (1999) Solomon Asch’s legacy for group research. Personal Soc Psychol Rev 3(4):358–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Lichtenstein S, Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Layman M, Combs B (1978) Judged frequency of lethal events. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn 4:551–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Lind EA, Van den Bos K (2002) When fairness works: toward a general theory of uncertainty management. Res Organ Behav 24:181–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Lockwood M (2010) Good governance for terrestrial protected areas: a framework, principles and performance outcomes. J Environ Manag 91:754–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Loewenstein GF, Weber EU, Hsee CK, Welch N (2001) Risk as feelings. Psychol Bull 127(2):267–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Lubell M (2004) Collaborative environmental institutions: all talk and no action? J Policy Anal Manag 23(3):549–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Lubell M, Henry AD, McCoy M (2010) Collaborative institutions in an ecology of games. Am J Polit Sci 54(2):287–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Lydon M, Bartman D, Woudstra R, Khawarzad A (2010) Tactical urbanism: short term action: long term change, vol 1. Issuu. . Accessed 1 Aug 2017
  79. Marshall G (2008) Nesting, subsidiarity, and community-based environmental governance beyond the local scale. Int J Commons 2(1):75–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Mashuda S, Good-Stefani G, France T et al (2016). Letter: Re: Federal agencies’ NEPA process on Columbia-Snake River dam operations: process obscures facts, fails to invite meaningful public participation. EarthJustice. Accessed 14 June 2017
  81. McComas KA, Stedman R, Hart PS (2011) Community support for campus approaches to sustainable energy use: the role of “town–gown” relationships. Energy Policy 39:2310–2318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. McCright AM, Xiao C, Dunlap RE (2014) Political polarization on support for government spending on environmental protection in the USA, 1974–2012. Soc Sci Res 48:251–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. McGinley PC (2011) Climate change and the war on coal: exploring the dark side. Vermont J EnviroN Law 13:255–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Moller AC, Ryan RM, Deci EL (2006) Self-determination theory and public policy: improving the quality of consumer decisions without using coercion. J Publ Policy and Mark 25(1):104–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Moscovici S (1988) Notes towards a description of social representations. Eur J Soc Psychol 18(3):211–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Moser SC, Ekstrom JA (2010) A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 107(51):22026–22031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Moskowitz P (2014) Cold weather snap fuels misinformation over climate change. Al Jazeera America. Accessed 16 Mar 2016
  88. Mulder LB, van Dijk E, DeCremer D, Wilke HAM (2006) Undermining trust and cooperation: the paradox of sanctioning systems in social dilemmas. J Exp Soc Psychol 42:147–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Munaretto S, Siciliano G, Turvani ME (2014) Integrating adaptive governance and participatory multicriteria methods: a framework for climate adaptation governance. Ecol Soc 19(2):74. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. National Civic League [NCL] (2013) Making public participation legal. Accessed 31 July 2017
  91. Nickerson RS (1998) Confirmation bias: a ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev Gen Psychol 2(2):175–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. O’Leary R, Bingham LB, Choi Y (2010) Teaching collaborative leadership: ideas and lessons for the field. J Public Affairs Edu 16(4):565–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Opotow S, Brook A (2003) Identity and exclusion in rangeland conflict. In: Clayton S, Opotow S (eds) Identity and natural environment: the psychological significance of nature. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 249–272Google Scholar
  94. Ostrom E (1965) Public entrepreneurship: a case study in ground water management. Dissertation, University of California at Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  95. Ostrom V (1971) The political theory of a compound republic: designing the American experiment, 2nd edn. Institute for Contemporary Studies Press, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  96. Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Ostrom E (1998) A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action: presidential address, American Political Science Association, 1997. Am Polit Sci Rev 91:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Ostrom E (2005) Animating institutional analysis. In: Ostrom E (ed) Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 99–133Google Scholar
  99. Ostrom E (2010) Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. Am Econ Rev 100:1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Ostrom E (2014) Do institutions for collective action evolve? J Bioecon 16:3–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Pahl-Wostl C (2009) A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Glob Environ Chang 19(3):354–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Parker L (2016) What happens to the U.S. Midwest when the water’s gone? National Geographic, August 2016. Accessed 15 June 2017
  103. Parks C, Joireman J, Lange P (2013) Cooperation, trust, and antagonism: how public goods are promoted. Psychol Sci Public Interest 14(3):119–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Peluso NL (1993) Coercing conservation? The politics of state resource control. Glob Environ Chang 3(2):199–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Rachlinski JJ (1998) Limits of social norms. Chicago-Kent Law Rev 74:1537–1567Google Scholar
  106. Reed M (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol Conserv 141:2417–2431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Sarker A (2013) The role of state-reinforced self-governance in averting the tragedy of the irrigation commons in Japan. Public Adm 91(3):727–743Google Scholar
  108. Sarkki S, Rantala L, Karjalainen TP (2015) Fit between conservation instruments and local social systems: cases of co-management and payments for ecosystem services. Change and Adapt Socio-Ecol Syst 2(1):59–78Google Scholar
  109. Schlager E, Heikkila T (2011) Left high and dry? Climate change, common-pool resource theory, and adaptability of Western water compacts. Public Adm Rev 71(3):461–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Schlager E, Heikkila T, Case C (2012) The costs of compliance with interstate agreements: lessons from water compacts in the western United States. Publius, J Federalism 42(3):494–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Schlichting I (2013) Strategic framing of climate change by industry actors: a meta-analysis. Environ Commun, J Nat Culture 7(4):493–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Silverman C (2007) Regret the error: how media mistakes pollute the press and imperil free speech. Union Square Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  113. Smith V (2012) Analysis: ‘war on coal’ label belies realities. Lexington Herald-Leader. Accessed 3 Mar 2016
  114. Stern PC, Easterling WE (eds) (1999) Making climate forecasts matter. National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  115. Stoknes PE (2014) Rethinking climate communications and the “psychological climate paradox”. Energy Res Soc Sci 1:161–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Swim JK, Stern PC, Doherty TJ, Clayton S, Reser JP, Weber EU, Gifford R, Howard GS (2011) Psychology’s contributions to understanding and addressing global climate change. Am Psychol 66(4):241–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Tenbrunsel AE, Messick DM (1999) Sanctioning systems, decision frames, and cooperation. Adm Sci Q 44(4):684–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Turner RA, Fitzsimmons C, Forster J, Mahon R, Peterson A, Stead SM (2014) Measuring good governance for complex ecosystems: perceptions of coral reef-dependent communities in the Caribbean. Glob Environ Chang 29:105–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Tyler TR (1988) What is procedural justice? Law and Soc Rev 22:301–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Tyler TR (1990) Why people obey the law. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  121. Tyler TR (2006) Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimization. Annu Rev Psychol 57:375–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Tyler TR, Degoey P (1995) Collective restraint in social dilemmas: procedural justice and social identification effects on support for authorities. J Pers Soc Psychol 69(3):482–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. United Nations [UN] (2015) The United Nations world water development report 2015: water for a sustainable world. World Water Assessment Programme, Paris. Accessed 16 Feb 2017
  124. Van Ness DW, Strong KH (2013) Restoring justice: an introduction to restorative justice. Bender, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  125. Vidal J (2016) Water supplies in Syria deteriorating fast due to conflict, experts warn. The Guardian. Accessed 15 June 2017
  126. Von Korff Y, d’Aquino P, Daniell KA, Bijlsma R (2010) Designing participation processes for water management and beyond. Ecol Soc 15(3):1. Accessed 1 August 2017
  127. Vreudenhil H, Slinger J, Kater E, Thissen W (2010) The influence of scale preferences on the design of a water innovation: a case in Dutch River management. Environ Manag 46(1):29–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Weber EU (2010) What shapes perceptions of climate change? Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 1(3):332–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Weber EU, Stern PC (2011) Public understanding of climate change in the United States. Am Psychol 66(4):315–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Winter DD (2000) Some big ideas for some big problems. Am Psychol 55(5):516–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Yamagishi T (1986) The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(1):110–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel A. DeCaro
    • 1
    Email author
  • Craig Anthony (Tony) Arnold
    • 2
  • Emmanuel Frimpong Boamah
    • 3
  • Ahjond S. Garmestani
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Urban and Public Affairs, Department of Psychological and Brain SciencesUniversity of LouisvilleLouisvilleUSA
  2. 2.Brandeis School of Law, Department of Urban and Public AffairsUniversity of LouisvilleLouisvilleUSA
  3. 3.Department of Urban and Regional PlanningUniversity of BuffaloBufalloUSA
  4. 4.School of Natural ResourcesUniversity of NebraskaLincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations