Advertisement

Expressing the World: Merleau-Ponty and Feminist Debates on Nature/Culture

  • Kathleen Lennon
Chapter
Part of the Breaking Feminist Waves book series (BFW)

Abstract

Feminist critical engagement with those sciences which have been put to work to legitimise oppressive social relations, made explicit the cultural situatedness of science and its mediation by the imaginaries in which scientists are placed. In response, what has been termed the ‘new materialism,’ claims to bring ‘the materiality of the human body and the natural world into the forefront of feminist theory and practice,’ in the face of, what it suggests were, overly constructivist accounts emerging from such feminist critique. I link these discussions to the writings of Merleau-Ponty. I suggest that the picture which Merleau-Ponty offers, of our bodies expressing the world, provides a metaphysics which undercuts the apparent opposition of these schools of thought.

Bibliography

  1. Alaimo, S., and S. Hekman, eds. 2008. Material Feminisms. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alcoff, L. 2012. Gender and Reproduction. In Embodied Selves, ed. S. Gonzalez-Arnal, G. Jagger, and K. Lennon. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  3. Baron–Cohen, S. 2012. The Essential Difference, Men, Women and the Extreme Male Brain. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  4. Bleir, R. 1984. Science and Gender: A Critique of Biology and Its Theories on Women. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  5. Butler, J. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 1993. Bodies that Matter: on the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Cameron, D. 2007. The Myth of Mars and Venus. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Fausto-Sterling, A. 1993. The Five Sexes: Why Male and Female Are Not Enough. The Sciences 33 (2): 20–25.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 2000. Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  10. Fehr, Carla. 2011. Feminist Philosophy of Biology. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2011 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/feminist-philosophy-biology/
  11. Fine, C. 2010. Delusions of Gender: The Real Science behind Sex Differences. London: Icon Books.Google Scholar
  12. Gonzalez-Arnal, S., G. Jagger, and K. Lennon, eds. 2012. Embodied Selves. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  13. Grosz, E. 2008. Darwin and Feminism: Preliminary Investigations for a Possible Alliance. In Material Feminisms, ed. S. Alaimo and S. Hekman. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Haraway, D. 1989. Primate Visions: Gender, Race and Nature in the World of Modern Science. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 1991a. Cyborgs at Large: Interview with Donna Haraway. In Technoculture, ed. C. Penley and A. Ross, 1–25. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 1991b. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan©_ Meets_OncoMouse™: Feminism and Technoscience. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 2003. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 2008. Otherworldly Conversations, Terran Topics, Local Terms. In Material Feminisms, ed. S. Alaimo and S. Hekman. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hass, L. 2008. Merleau-Ponty’s Philosophy. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Heidegger, M. 1971. The Origin of the Work of Art. In Poetry Language Thought (trans. Hofstadter, A.). New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  22. Jagger, G. 2015. The New Materialism and Sexual Difference. Signs 40 (2): 321–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kirby, V. 2008. Natural Convers(at)ions: Or, What if Culture Was Really Nature All Along? In Material Feminisms, ed. S. Alaimo and S. Hekman. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Lane, R. 2009. Trans as Bodily Becoming: Rethinking the Biological as Diversity Not Dichotomy. Hypatia 24 (3): 136–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lennon, K. 2012. Biology and the Metaphysics of Sex Difference. In Embodied Selves, ed. S. Gonzalez-Arnal, G. Jagger, and K. Lennon. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  26. Merleau-Ponty, M. 1993. Indirect Language and the Voices of Silence. In The Merleau-Ponty Aesthetics Reader, ed. G.A. Johnson. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  27. ———. 2003. Nature: Course Notes from the Collège de France. Trans. Dominique Séglard. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  28. ———. 2010. Institution and Passivity. Trans. Lawlor and Massey. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  29. ———. 2012. Phenomenology of Perception. Trans. Donald A. Landes. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Oudshoorn, N. 1994. Beyond the Natural Body: An Archaeology of Sex Hormones. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stone, A. 2006. Luce Irigaray and the Philosophy of Sexual Difference. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. ———. 2007. An Introduction to Feminist Philosophy. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  33. Toadvine, T. 2011, June. The Silence of Nature and the Emergence of Philosophy. Paper Presented at The Irish Phenomenological Circle Inaugural Conference Nature, Freedom and History: Merleau-Ponty after 50 Years, University College Dublin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathleen Lennon
    • 1
  1. 1.University of HullHullUK

Personalised recommendations