Advertisement

Using Structuration Theory to Assist in Understanding the Implementation and Adoption of Health Information Systems

  • Imran Muhammad
  • Nilmini Wickramasinghe
Chapter
Part of the Healthcare Delivery in the Information Age book series (Healthcare Delivery Inform. Age)

Abstract

Successful adoption and implementation of health information systems (HIS) has been the subject of extensive research as can be evidenced by the large body of recent research literature on this topic. Most scholars agree that these solutions are complex to understand and should be analysed under the lens of theoretically informed analytical tools. One approach identified in the literature used to facilitate correct and accurate capturing of the complexities and levels of interactions in healthcare operations and technologies is to use structuration theory (ST). To demonstrate the benefits and strengths of using ST, this chapter evaluates the merits of an ST analysis for the implementation and adoption of health information systems (HIS).

References

  1. Aaronson, J. W., Murphy-Cullen, C. L., Chop, W. M., & Frey, R. D. (2001). Electronic medical records: The family practice resident perspective. Family Medicine, 33(2), 128–132.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Aarts, J., Doorewaard, H., & Berg, M. (2004). Understanding implementation: The case of a computerized physician order entry system in a large Dutch University Medical Center. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 11, 207–216.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Aarts, J., & Koppel, R. (2009). Implementation of computerized physician order entry in seven countries. Health Affairs (Project Hope), 28(2), 404–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Abbott, T. (2005). The adoption of eHealth in Australia. In The Health Informatics Conference Melbourne 2005. Melbourne.Google Scholar
  5. Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1997). The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decision Sciences, 28(3), 557–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Altman, R. B. (1997). Informatics in the care of patients: Ten notable challenges. The Western Journal of Medicine, 166(2), 118–122.Google Scholar
  7. Al-Azmi, S., Al-Enezi, N., & Chowdhury, R. (2009). Users’ attitudes to an electronic medical record system and its correlates: A multivariate analysis. Health Information Management Journal, 38(2), 33–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ammenwerth, E., Iller, C., & Mahler, C. (2006). IT-adoption and the interaction of task, technology and individuals: A fit framework and a case study. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 6, 3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. André, B., Ringdal, G. I., Loge, J. H., Rannestad, T., Laerum, H., & Kaasa, S. (2008). Experiences with the implementation of computerized tools in health care units: A review article. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 24(8), 753–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ash, J. S., Sittig, D. F., Campbell, E., Guappone, K., & Dykstra, R. (2006). An unintended consequence of CPOE implementation: Shifts in power, control, and autonomy. In AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings (Vol. 2006, p. 11).Google Scholar
  11. Ashish, K. (2009). Use of electronic health records in U. S Hospitals Medical Benefits. https://doi.org/101056NEJMsa0900592, 25(10 SRC–GoogleScholar), 4–9.
  12. Atkinson, C., Eldabi, T., Paul, R., & Pouloudi, A. (2001). Investigating integrated socio-technical approaches to health informatics (p. 10–pp SRC–GoogleScholar)Google Scholar
  13. Avgerou, C. (2008). Information systems in developing countries: A critical research review. Journal of Information Technology, 23, 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bahensky, J. A., Jaana, M., & Ward, M. M. (2008). Health care information technology in rural America: Electronic medical record adoption status in meeting the national agenda. The Journal of Rural Health : Official Journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association, 24(2), 101–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Barker, C. (2011). Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice (Fourth Edition edition). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  16. Basch, P. (2005). Electronic health records and the national health information network: Affordable, adoptable, and ready for prime time? Annals of Internal Medicine, 143(3), 227–228.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Bates, D. W. (2005). Physicians and ambulatory electronic health records. Health Affairs, 24, 1180–1189.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Bath, P. (2008). Health informatics: Current issues and challenges. Journal of Information Science, 34(4), 501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bernstein, M. L., McCreless, T., & Côté, M. J. (2007). Five constants of information technology adoption in healthcare. Hospital Topics, 85(1), 17–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Boonstra, A., & Broekhuis, M. (2010). Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions. BMC Health Services Research, 10(1), 231.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Car, J., Anandan, C., Black, A., Cresswell, K., Pagliari, C., McKinstry, B., et al. (2008). The impact of eHealth on the quality & safety of healthcare: A systematic overview and synthesis of the literature, report, NHS Connecting for Health Evaluation Programme.Google Scholar
  22. Cash, J. (2008). Technology can make or break the hospital-physician relationship. Healthcare Financial Management : Journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association, 62(12), 104–109.Google Scholar
  23. Catwell, L., & Sheikh, A. (2009). Evaluating eHealth interventions: The need for continuous systemic evaluation. PLoS Medicine, 6(8), e1000126.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000126
  24. Cohn, K., Berman, J., Chaiken, B., Green, D., Green, M., Morrison, D., et al. (2009). Engaging physicians to adopt healthcare information technology. Journal of Healthcare Management/American College of Healthcare Executives, 54(5), 291.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Coiera, E. (2004). Four rules for the reinvention of health care. British Medical Journal, 328(7449), 1197–1199.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Coiera, E. (2011). Do we need a national electronic summary care record? The Medical Journal of Australia, 194(2), 90–92.Google Scholar
  27. Cresswell, K., Worth, A., & Sheikh, A. (2011). Implementing and adopting electronic health record systems: How actor-network theory can support evaluation. Clinical Governance: An International Journal, 16(4), 320–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Cresswell, K. M., Worth, A., & Sheikh, A. (2010). Actor-network theory and its role in understanding the implementation of information technology developments in healthcare. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 10, 67.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Culnan, M., & Armstrong, P. K. (1997). Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness and impersonal trust: An empirical investigation. Available at: http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.40.5243
  30. Dansky, K. H., Gamm, L. D., Vasey, J. J., & Barsukiewicz, C. K. (1999). Electronic medical records: are physicians ready? J Healthc Manag, 44(6), 440–454.Google Scholar
  31. Davidson, E., & Heslinga, D. (2007). Bridging the IT – Adoption Gap for Small Physician Practices: An Action Research Study on Electronic Health Records. Information Systems Management, 24(1), 15.Google Scholar
  32. DePhillips, H. A. (2007). Initiatives and barriers to adopting health information technology: A US perspective. Disease Management and Health Outcomes, 15(1), 1–6. Available at: http://ideas.repec.org/a/wkh/dmhout/v15y2007i1p1-6.html. Accessed September 27, 2011.
  33. DesRoches, C. M., Campbell, E. G., Rao, S. R., Donelan, K., Ferris, T. G., Jha, A., et al. (2008). Electronic health records in ambulatory care – A national survey of physicians. New England Journal of Medicine, 359(1), 50–60.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa0802005
  34. Elrod, J., & Androwich, I. M. (2009). Applying human factors analysis to the design of the electronic health record. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 146, 132–136.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Fichman, R. G., Kohli, R., & Krishnan, R. (2011). Editorial overview—the role of information systems in healthcare: Current research and future trends. Information Systems Research, 22(3), 419–428.  https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1110.0382
  36. Frame, J., Watson, J., & Thomson, K. (2008). Deploying a culture change programme management approach in support of information and communication technology developments in Greater Glasgow NHS Board. Health Informatics Journal, 14(2), 125–139.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Gaylin, D., Goldman, S., Ketchel, A., Moiduddin, A., & Chicago, I. (2005). Community Health Center Information Systems Assessment: Issues and Opportunities Final Report (p. 125). NORC at the University of Chicago. Retrieved from http://aspe.hhs.gov/sp/chc
  38. Giddens, A. (2013). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  39. Goldstein, M. M., & Blumenthal, D. (2008). Building an information technology infrastructure. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics: A Journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 36(4), 709–715, 609.Google Scholar
  40. Greenhalgh, T., & Stones, R. (2010). Theorising big IT programmes in healthcare: Strong structuration theory meets actor-network theory. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 70(9), 1285–1294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hanseth, O., & Monteiro, E. (1998). Understanding information infrastructure. Unpublished Book, http://Heim.Ifi.Uio.No/∼Oleha/Publications/Bok. Html. Retrieved from http://heim.ifi.uio.no/oleha/Publications/bok.pdf
  42. Hanseth, O., Aanestad, M., & Berg, M. (2004). Guest editors’ introduction: Actor-network theory and information systems. What’s so special? Information Technology & People, 17(2), 116–123.Google Scholar
  43. Hennington, A. H., & Janz, B., (2007). Information systems and healthcare XVI: Physician adoption of electronic medical records: Applying the UTAUT model in a healthcare context. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 19(1), 5.Google Scholar
  44. HFMA. (2006). Overcoming barriers to electronic health record adoption: Results of survey and roundtable discussions conducted by the Healthcare Financial Management Association. Available at: http://mhcc.maryland.gov/electronichealth/mhitr/EHR%20Links/overcoming_barriers_to_ehr_adoption.pdf. Accessed October 4, 2011.
  45. Hikmet, N., Bhattacherjee, A., Menachemi, N., Kayhan, V. O., & Brooks, R. G. (2008). The role of organizational factors in the adoption of healthcare information technology in Florida hospitals. Health Care Management Science, 11(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
  46. Hoffinan, L. (2009). Implementing electronic medical records. Communications of the ACM, 52(11), 18–20.  https://doi.org/10.1145/1592761.1592770
  47. Hoffinan, S., & Podguski, A. (2008). Finding a cure: The case for regulation and oversight of electronic health record systems. Harv. JL & Tech., 22, 103.Google Scholar
  48. Hovenga, E. J. S., Kidd, M. R., Garde, S., & Cossio, C. H. L. (2010). Health Informatics: An Overview (1 edition). Amsterdam; Washington, DC: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  49. Huang, Z., & Palvia, P. (2001). ERP implementation issues in advanced and developing countries. Business Process Management Journal, 7(3), 276–284.  https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150110392773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kaplan, B., & Harris-Salamone, K. D. (2009). Health IT success and failure: Recommendations from literature and an AMIA workshop. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 16(3), 291–299.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Kennedy, B. L. (2011). Exploring the sustainment of health information technology: Successful practices for addressing human factors. Northcentral University.Google Scholar
  52. Kimaro, H., & Nhampossa, J. (2004). The challenges of sustainability of health information systems in developing countries: Comparative case studies of Mozambique and Tanzania 1(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
  53. Kralewski, J., Dowd, B. E., Zink, T., & Gans, D. N. (2010). Preparing your practice for the adoption and implementation of electronic health records. Physician Executive, 36(2), 30–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Kukafka, R., Johnson, S. B., Linfante, A., & Allegrante, J. P. (2003). Grounding a new information technology implementation framework in behavioral science: A systematic analysis of the literature on IT use. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 36(3), 218–227.Google Scholar
  55. Latour, B. (2003). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Latour, B., Harbers, H., & Koenis, S. (1996). On actor-network theory: A few clarifications. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  58. Law, J., & Hassard, J. (1999). Actor network theory and after. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  59. Law, J., & Hassard, J. (2004). Actor-network theory and after. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  60. Leykum, L. K., Pugh, J. A., Lanham, H. J., Harmon, J., & McDaniel, R. R. (2009). Implementation research design: integrating participatory action research into randomized controlled trials. Implementation Science: IS, 4, 69–69.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-69
  61. Liu, L. S., Shih, P. C., & Hayes, G. R. (2011). Barriers to the adoption and use of personal health record systems. In Proceedings of the 2011 iConference, pp. 363–370.Google Scholar
  62. Lorenzi, N., Kouroubali, A., Detmer, D. E., & Bloomrosen, M. (2009). How to successfully select and implement electronic health records (EHR) in small ambulatory practice settings. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 9, 15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. McLean, C., & Hassard, J. (2004). Symmetrical absence/symmetrical absurdity: Critical notes on the production of actor-network accounts. Journal of Management Studies, 41(3), 493–519.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00442.x
  64. McPhee, R. D., & Poole, M. S. (2001). Organizational structures and configurations. In The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research and methods (pp. 503–543).Google Scholar
  65. McReavy, D., Toth, L., Tremonti, C., & Yoder, C. (2009). The CFO’s role in implementing EHR systems: The experiences of a Florida health system point to 10 actions that can help CFOs manage the revenue risks and opportunities of implementing an electronic health record. Retrieved December 16, 2011, from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3257/is_6_63/ai_n35529545/
  66. Mitchell, V., & Nault, B. (2008). The emergence of functional knowledge in sociotechnical systems. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5c3a/a7d7d20309ce9dc9572aa41915436ad31219.pdf
  67. Mort, M., Finch, T., & May, C. (2009). Making and unmaking telepatients: Identity and governance in new health technologies. Science, Technology & Human Values, 34(1), 9–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Muhammad, I., Teoh, S. Y., & Wickramasinghe, N. (2012). Why Using Actor-Network Theory (ANT) Can Help to Understand the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR) in Australia. International Journal of Actor-Network Theory and Technological Innovation (IJANTTI), 4(2), 44–60.Google Scholar
  69. Parente, S., & McCullough (2009). Health information technology and patient safety: evidence from panel data. Health Affairs, 28(2).  https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.357, Accessed on Apr 10 2018.
  70. Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record Act (2012).Google Scholar
  71. Protti, D., & Smit, C. (2006). The Netherlands: Another European country where GPs have been using EMRs for over twenty years. Healthcare Information Management & Communications, 30(3). Available at: http://www.healthcareimc.com/bcovers/PDFS/TheNetherlands.pdf
  72. Protti, D., Johansen, I., & Perez-Torres, F. (2009). Comparing the application of Health Information Technology in primary care in Denmark and Andalucía, Spain. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 78(4), 270–283.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.08.002
  73. Rosebaugh, D. (2004). Getting ready for the software in your future. Home Health Care Management Practice, 16(3), 228–234. https://doi.org/1011771084822303259877
  74. Rosenbloom, S. T., Qi, X., Riddle, W. R., Russell, W. E., DonLevy, S. C., Giuse, D., et al. (2006). Implementing pediatric growth charts into an electronic health record system. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 13, 302–308.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  75. Ross, S. E., Schilling, L. M., Fernald, D. H., Davidson, A. J., & West, D. R. (2010). Health information exchange in small-to-medium sized family medicine practices: Motivators, barriers, and potential facilitators of adoption. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 79(2), 123–129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.12.001
  76. Rydin, Y. (2010). Actor-network theory and planning theory: A response to Boelens. Planning Theory, 9, 265–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Scott, J. T., Rundall, T. G., Vogt, T. M., & Hsu, J. (2005). Kaiser Permanente’s experience of implementing an electronic medical record: a qualitative study. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 331(7528), 1313–1316.Google Scholar
  78. Shaban, R. (2005). Theories of clinical judgment and decision-making: A review of the theoretical literature. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, 3(1). Retrieved from https://ajp.paramedics.org/index.php/ajp/article/view/308
  79. Sharma, R., Southon, G., & Yetton, P. (1999). Successful IS innovation: the contingent contributions of innovation characteristics and implementation process. Journal of Information Technology, 14(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/026839699344746
  80. Showell, C. M. (2011). Citizens, patients and policy: A challenge for Australia’s national electronic health record. Health Information Management Journal OnLine, 40(2), 39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Staples, W. G. (2007). Encyclopedia of Privacy: A-M. Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  82. Tang, P. C., Ash, J. S., Bates, D. W., Overhage, J. M., & Sands, D. Z. (2006). Personal health records: Definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA, 13(2), 121–126.  https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M2025
  83. Thompson, R., Compeau, D., Higgins, C., & Lupton, N. (2008). Intentions to use information technologies: An integrative model.Google Scholar
  84. Thweatt, E. G., & Kleiner, B. H. (2007). New developments in health care organisational management. Journal of Health Management, 9(3), 433–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Timpka, T., Bång, M., Delbanco, T., & Walker, J. (2007). Information infrastructure for inter-organizational mental health services: An actor network theory analysis of psychiatric rehabilitation. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 40(4), 429–437.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Tobler, N. (2008). Technology, organizational change, and the nonhuman agent: Exploratory analysis of electronic health record implementation in a small practice ambulatory care. Utah: The University of Utah.Google Scholar
  87. Torda, P., Han, E. S., & Scholle, S. H. (2010). Easing the adoption and use of electronic health records in small practices. Health Affairs (Project Hope), 29(4), 668–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Trudel, M. C. (2010). Challenges to personal information sharing in interorganizational settings: Learning from the Quebec Health Smart Card project. London: The University of Western Ontario.Google Scholar
  89. Vitacca, M., Mazzù, M., & Scalvini, S. (2009). Socio-technical and organizational challenges to wider e-Health implementation. Chronic Respiratory Disease, 6(2), 91–97.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Walsham, G. (1997). Actor-network theory and IS research: Current status and future prospects. In Information Systems and Qualitative Research: Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 WG 8.2 International Conference on Information Systems and Qualitative Research, 31st May–3rd June 1997, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA (pp. 466–481).Google Scholar
  91. Weimar, C. (2009). Electronic health care advances, physician frustration grows. Physician Executive, 35(2), 8–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Wickramasinghe, N., & Bali, R. K. (2009). The S’ANT imperative for realizing the vision of healthcare network centric operations. International Journal of ActorNetwork Theory and Technological Innovation IJANTTI, 1(1), 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wickramasinghe, N., & Schaffer, J. (2010). Realizing value driven e-Health solutions. Washington DC: IBM Centre for the Business of government.Google Scholar
  94. Williams-Jones, B., & Graham, J. E. (2003). Actor-network theory: a tool to support ethical analysis of commercial genetic testing. New Genetics and Society, 22(3), 271–296.Google Scholar
  95. Yusof, M., Stergioulas, L., & Zugic, J. (2007). Health information systems adoption: Findings from a systematic review. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 129(Pt 1), 262.Google Scholar
  96. Yusof, M. M., Papazafeiropoulou, A., Paul, R. J., & Stergioulas, L. K. (2008). Investigating evaluation frameworks for health information systems. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 77(6), 377–385.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.08.004

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Imran Muhammad
    • 1
    • 2
  • Nilmini Wickramasinghe
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Deakin UniversityBurwoodAustralia
  2. 2.Epworth HealthCareRichmondAustralia

Personalised recommendations