Advertisement

Global Forest Governance and Climate Change: Introduction and Overview

  • Emmanuel O. Nuesiri
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Natural Resource Management book series (PSNRM)

Abstract

The book shows that Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) is reconfiguring forest governance, including decentralized forestry arrangements, in ways that might deepen the subjection of local people to the interests of powerful actors (governments, business, and NGOs) in the forestry sector. However, local people and authorities are contesting their subjection under new governance arrangements due to adoption of REDD+. What this top-down reconfiguration of governance and bottom-up contestation will bring about is open to debate. This volume’s major contribution is to call on researchers, policymakers at global and national levels, and non-state actors with powerful influence on decision-making to choose inclusive and complementary representation of local communities in participatory processes associated with the adoption of REDD+.

References

  1. Caucus, A. (2013). REDD+ Safeguards: More Than Good Intentions? Case Studies from the Accra Caucus. Oslo: Rainforest Foundation.Google Scholar
  2. Celis, K., Childs, S., Kantola, J., & Krook, M. L. (2008). Rethinking Women’s Substantive Representation. Representation, 44(2), 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (2001). The Case for Participation as Tyranny. In B. Cooke & U. Kothari (Eds.), Participation: The New Tyranny? (pp. 1–15). London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  4. Davenport, C., & Lipton, E. (2017, June 3). How G.O.P. Leaders Came to View Climate Change as Fake Science. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/03/us/politics/republican-leaders-climate-change.html?mcubz=1
  5. Dovi, S. (2002). Preferable Descriptive Representatives: Will Just Any Woman, Black, or Latino Do? American Political Science Review, 96(4), 729–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dovi, S. (2009). In Praise of Exclusion. The Journal of Politics, 71(3), 1172–1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eaton, K., & Connerley, E. (2010). Democracy, Development, and Security as Objectives of Decentralization. In E. Connerley, K. Eaton, & P. J. Smoke (Eds.), Making Decentralization Work: Democracy, Development, and Security (pp. 1–24). Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Ece, M., Murombedzi, J., & Ribot, J. (2017). Disempowering Democracy: Local Representation in Community and Carbon Forestry in Africa. Conservation and Society, 15(4), 357–370.Google Scholar
  9. Focus, C. (2015). Forests and Land Use in the Paris Agreement, Climate Focus Client Brief on the Paris Agreement I. Amsterdam: Climate Focus.Google Scholar
  10. Geiling, N. (2017, July 12). Cities and States Solidify Their Plan to Move Forward on Climate Without Trump. Think Progress. Retrieved from https://thinkprogress.org/cities-states-businesses-measure-paris-targets-d24a314c98c4/
  11. Knowles, S. G. (2017, September 17). Why Hurricanes Harvey and Irma Won’t Lead to Action on Climate Change. The Conversation. Retrieved from http://theconversation.com/why-hurricanes-harvey-and-irma-wont-lead-to-action-on-climate-change-83770
  12. Manin, B., Przeworski, A., & Stokes, S. (1999). Introduction. In B. Manin, A. Przeworski, & S. Stokes (Eds.), Democracy, Accountability, and Representation (pp. 1–26). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Mansbridge, J. (1999). Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent “Yes”. The Journal of Politics, 61(3), 628–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mohan, V. (2017, July 9). G20 Leaders Move Forward on Paris Climate Deal, Without Us. The Economic Times. Retrieved from http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/environment/global-warming/g20-leaders-move-forward-on-paris-climate-deal-without-us/articleshow/59507235.cms
  15. Montanaro, L. (2017). Representing Affected Interests. In M. B. Vieira (Ed.), Reclaiming Representation: Contemporary Advances in the Theory of Political Representation (pp. 21–226). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  16. Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. Rehfeld, A. (2011). The Concepts of Representation. American Political Science Review, 105(3), 631–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ribot, J. (2016). RFGI Handbook I: Leveraging Local Democracy through Forestry (Field Testing Version) (Responsive Forest Governance Initiative Working Paper Series No. 34). Dakar: CODESRIA.Google Scholar
  19. Ribot, J. (2017). Choosing Democracy: Natural Resource Management for Environmental Policy Makers, Donors and Practitioners (Policy Brief). Visby: Swedish International Center for Local Democracy.Google Scholar
  20. Roe, S., Streck, C., Pritchard, L., & Costenbader, J. (2013). Safeguards in REDD+ and Forest Carbon Standards: A Review of Social, Environmental and Procedural Concepts and Application. Amsterdam: Climate Focus.Google Scholar
  21. Saward, M. (2010). The Representative Claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schedler, A. (1999). Conceptualizing Accountability. In A. Schedler, L. J. Diamond, & M. F. Plattner (Eds.), The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies (pp. 13–28). Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. United Nations. (2015). The Paris Agreement. Retrieved September 26, 2017, from http://unfccc.int/paris_agreement/items/9485.php
  24. UN-REDD. (2008). Un Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries (UN-REDD), an FAO, UNDP, UNEP Framework Document. Geneva: UN-REDD.Google Scholar
  25. UN-REDD. (2013). Guidelines on Free, Prior and Informed Consent. Geneva: UN-REDD.Google Scholar
  26. Urbinati, N. (2000). Representation as Advocacy: A Study of Democratic Deliberation. Political Theory, 28(6), 758–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Urbinati, N., & Warren, M. E. (2008). The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Democratic Theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(2008), 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Williams, M. S. (1998). Voice, Trust, and Memory: Marginalized Groups and the Failings of Liberal Representation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and Democracy Oxford University Press. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emmanuel O. Nuesiri
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Economics and Social SciencesUniversity of PotsdamPotsdamGermany

Personalised recommendations