The Stethoscope: Historical Considerations

Chapter

Abstract

It is now more than 200 hundred years since René Laennec invented the stethoscope [1–6], a device that became the unofficial badge of office for doctors for the best part of two centuries. Hailed as one of the great additions to the physician’s non-invasive diagnostic armamentarium, there is no doubt that it has had a huge impact on clinical practice for much of this time. Laennec’s classic textbook, A Treatise on Mediate Auscultation and Diseases of the Lungs and Heart first published 1819 [1], provided entirely novel and profound insights into both pulmonary and cardiac disease. In this he describes the events that lead to the invention of the stethoscope just 3 years earlier and his insights into the significance of the clinical findings he was able to elicit both with ‘mediate auscultation’ via the stethoscope and using the recently described technique of percussion, which he helped popularise. He was also able to use his skills in the field of morbid anatomy to inform his interpretation of the clinical signs he elicited when examining his many patients. Thus he helped play a central role in developing a rational scientific foundation for examination of the chest that continues to underpin routine clinical practice to this day.

References

  1. 1.
    Laënnec RTH (1819) De l'ausculatation médiate, un Traité du diagnostic des maladies des poumons et du coeur, fonde, principalement sur ce naveau moyen d'exploration. (A treatise on the diseases of the chest and on mediate auscultation) Paris, Brosson et ChandeGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Williams CT (1907) A Lecture on Lannec and the evolution of the stethescope: Delivered before the Medical Department of the University of Oxford. Br Med J 6(2):6–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sakula A (1981) R T H Laënnec 1781-1826 his life and work: a bicentenary appreciation. Thorax 36:81–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kligfield P (1981) Laennec and the discovery of mediate auscultation. Am J Med 70:275–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reiser SJ (1979) The medical influence of the stethoscope. Sci Am 240:148–150. 153-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Roguin A (2006) Rene Theophile Hyacinthe Laënnec (1781-1826): the man behind the stethoscope. Clin Med Res 4:230–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Laënnec RTH (1821) A treatise on the diseases of the chest, in which they are described according to their anatomical characters, and their diagnosis established on a new principle by means of acoustic instruments (trans: Forbes J). London: Underwood.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Owen RG (1939) The microphone, stethoscope, telephone and artificial aids to hearing; their historical relationship. Cal West Med 51:169–171PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Auenbrugger L (1761) Inventum novum ex percussione thoracis humani ut signo abstrusos interni pectoris morbos dete-gendi. Trattner, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Corvisart JN (1808) (trans): Nouvelle m&hode pour reconnaftre les maladies internes de la poitrine par la percussion de cette cavite, par Avenbrugger. Paris: MigneretGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Williams CT (1907) A lecture on Laennec and the evolution of the stethoscope: delivered before the medical Department of the University of Oxford. Br Med J 2(2427):6–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bishop PJ (1981) Reception of the stethoscope and Laënnec’s book. Thorax 36:487–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Williams CJ (1874) On the acoustic principles and construction of stethoscopes and ear trumpets. Med Chir Trans 57:21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    (1935) An electronic stethoscope. Can Med Assoc J:304–305Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sheldon P (1949 Jan) B & Doe J. The development of the stethoscope: and Br Heart J 11(1):48–54Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Phillips AF (1949) A loud-speaker stethoscope for clinical teaching. Br Heart J 11:48–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hampton CS, Chaloner A (1967) Which stethoscope? Br Med J 4(5576):388–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hollman A (2002) Book review: an ear to the chest: an illustrated history of the evolution of the stethoscope. J Roy Soc Med 95:625–626Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bishop PJ (1980) Evolution of the stethoscope. J R Soc Med 73:448–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hunt FL, Myres MJ (1921) Experiments on the recording and reproduction of cardiac and respiratory sounds. Science 54(1398):359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fenton RT, Pasterkamp H, Tal A, Chernik V (1985) Automated spectral characterization of wheezing in asthmatic children. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 32:50–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sovijärvi A, Vanderschoot J, Earis JE (2000) Standardisation of computerised breath sounds analysis. Eur Respir Rev 10(77):585Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Anderson K, Qiu Y, Whittaker AR, Lucas M (2001) Breath sounds, asthma, and the mobile phone. Lancet 358(9290):1343–1344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Robertson AJ (1957) Rales, rhonchi, and Laennec. After an evening with Robert Coope. Lancet 2:417–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Thompson T (1853) Hints on auscultation, with a view to the simplification of terms and arrangement. Assoc Med J 1:364–366PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    West S (1897) Bronchial breathing and râles: a clinical demonstration on some of the difficulties of auscultation given at St. Bartholomew's Hospital. Br Med J 2(1906):65–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kinghorn HM (1932 Apr) The classification of rales. Can Med Assoc J 26(4):438–445PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Forgacs P (1967) Crackles and wheezes. Lancet 2:203–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    (1977) Report of the ATS-ACCP ad hoc committee on pulmonary nomenclature. Am Thor Soc News 3:5–6Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cugell D (1978) Sounds of the lungs (editorial). Chest 73:311–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kraman SS (1986) Lung sounds for the clinician. Arch Intern Med 146(7):1411–1412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Murphy RL (1981) Auscultation of the lung: past lessons, future possibilities. Thorax 36(2):99–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pasterkamp H, Kraman SS, Wodicka GR (1997) Respiratory sounds. Advances beyond the stethoscope. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 156(3 Pt 1):974–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sovijärvi A, Dalmasso F, Vanderschoot J, Malmberg LP, Righini G, Stoneman SA (2000) Definitions of term for applications of respiratory sounds. Eur Respir Rev 77:597–610Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bohadana A, Izbicki G, Kraman SS (2014) Fundamentals of lung auscultation. N Engl J Med 370(8):744–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Klein M (2014) Fundamentals of lung auscultation. N Engl J Med 370:205Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pasterkamp H, Brand PL, Everard M, Garcia-Marcos L, Melbye H, Priftis KN (2016) Towards the standardisation of lung sound nomenclature. Eur Respir J 47(3):724–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Renzetti AD Jr (1979) Lung sound terminology. Chest 76(6):615–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bunin NJ, Loudon RG (1979) Lung sound terminology in case reports. Chest 76(6):690–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wilkins RL, Dexter JR, Smith JR (1984) Survey of adventitious lung sound terminology in case reports. Chest 85(4):523–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pasterkamp H, Montgomery M, Wiebicke W (1987) Nomenclature used by health care professionals to describe breath sounds in asthma. Chest 92(2):346–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Pasterkamp H, Wiebicke W, Fenton R (1987) Subjective assessment vs computer analysis of wheezing in asthma. Chest 91(3):376–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wilkins RL, Dexter JR, Murphy RL Jr, DelBono EA (1990) Lung sound nomenclature survey. Chest 98(4):886–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wilkins RL, Dexter JR (1990) Comparing RCPs to physicians for the description of lung sounds: are we accurate and can we communicate? Respir Care 35(10):969–976PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Brooks D, Thomas J (1995) Interrater reliability of auscultation of breath sounds among physical therapists. Phys Ther 75(12):1082–1088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Postiaux G, Lens E (1999) Pulmonary stethacoustic nomenclature: Why not a worldwide consensus? Rev Mal Respir 16(6):1075–1090PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Mangione S, Nieman LZ (1999) Pulmonary auscultatory skills during training in internal medicine and family practice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 159(4 Pt 1):1119–1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Elphick HE, Ritson S, Rogers H, Everard ML (2000) When a ‘wheeze’ is not a wheeze - analysis of breath sounds in infancy. Eur Respir J 16:593–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Elphick HE, Lancaster GA, Solis A, Majumdar A, Gupta R, Smyth RL (2004) Validity and reliability of acoustic analysis of respiratory sounds in infants. Arch Dis Child 89(11):1059–1063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Elphick H, Everard ML (2002) Noisy breathing in children. In: David T (ed) Recent Advances in Paediatrics. The Royal Society of Medicine, LondonGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Staszko KF, Lincho C, Engelke Vda C, Fiori NS, Silva KC, Nunes EI, Zhang L (2006) Pulmonary auscultation terminology employed in Brazilian medical journals between January of 1980 and December of 2003. J Bras Pneumol 32(5):400–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Mangione S, Torre DM (2003) Teaching of pulmonary auscultation in pediatrics: a nationwide survey of all U.S. accredited residencies. Pediatr Pulmonol 35(6):472–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Mellis C (2009) Respiratory noises: how useful are they clinically? Pediatr Clin N Am 56:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Benbassat J, Baumal R (2010) Narrative review: should teaching of the respiratory physical examination be restricted only to signs with proven reliability and validity? J Gen Intern Med 25:865–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Francis NA, Melbye H, Kelly MJ, Cals JW, Hopstaken RM, Coenen S, Butler CC (2013) Variation in family physicians' recording of auscultation abnormalities in patients with acute cough is not explained by case mix. A study from 12 European networks. Eur J Gen Pract 19(2):77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Melbye H, Garcia-Marcos L, Brand P, Everard ML, Priftis K, Hans Pasterkamp H (2016) The ERS task force for lung sounds. Wheezes, crackles and rhonchi: simplifying description of lung sounds increases the agreement on their classification. BMJ Open Respir Res 3(1):e000136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Maxwell J, Kerley P, Blair LG (1946) Discussion on the stethoscope versus x-rays. Proc R Soc Med 39:355–357PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Markel H (2006) The stethoscope and the art of listening. N Engl J Med 354(6):551–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Murphy RL (2008) In defense of the stethoscope. Respir Care 53(3):355–369PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Bank I, Vliegen HW, Bruschke AV (2016) The 200th anniversary of the stethoscope: can this low-tech device survive in the high-tech 21st century? Eur Heart J 37(47):3536–3543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Tomos I, Karakatsani A, Manali ED, Papiris SA (2016) Celebrating two centuries since the invention of the stethoscope. René Théophile Hyacinthe Laënnec (1781-1826). Ann Am Thorac Soc 13(10):1667–1670PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Fakoya FA, du Plessis M, Gbenimacho IB (2016) Ultrasound and stethoscope as tools in medical education and practice: considerations for the archives. Adv Med Educ Pract 7:381–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    King A, Crewe I (2014) The blunders of our Governments. Oneworld, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Paediatrics and Child Health, Princess Margaret Hospital for ChildrenUniversity of Western AustraliaSubiacoAustralia
  2. 2.Division of Child Health, University of Western AustraliaPerth Children’s HospitalPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations