Advertisement

Post Scriptum: Illusio and the Reproduction of the Corps—Notes from an Ambivalent Gatekeeper

  • Sebastiaan Faber
Chapter

Abstract

Humanistic scholarship is adrift. As the intrinsic value of literature, once assumed as a given, has come under question, the scope of the phenomena to be analyzed has widened. Yet literature continues to be a preferred object of scholarly analysis, leading to a mismatch between claims made and proof adduced. This mismatch illustrates a deeper problem that, through Bourdieu, can be described as a loss of illusio: the shared belief in the game among those invested in it. While Bourdieu writes that “one cannot found a genuine science of the work of art without tearing oneself out of the illusio,” he adds that it is “only exceptionally, especially in moments of crisis, that certain agents may develop a conscious and explicit representation of the game as a game, one which destroys the investment in the game, the illusio, by making it appear what it always objectively is … [:] a historical fiction ….”

Works Cited

  1. Bourdieu, Pierre. Homo Academicus. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  2. ———. The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature, ed. Randal Johnson. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  3. ———. The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  4. Calhoun, Craig J., Edward LiPuma, and Moishe Postone, eds. Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  5. Dijstelbloem, Huub, Frank Huisman, Frank Miedema, and Wijnand Mijnhardt. “Why Science Does Not Work as It Should and What To Do about It.” In Science in Transition. October 17, 2013. http://www.scienceintransition.nl/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Science-in-Transition-Position-Paper-final.pdf
  6. During, Simon. “Stop Defending the Humanities.” Public Books. March 14, 2014. http://www.publicbooks.org/nonfiction/stop-defending-the-humanities
  7. Faber, Sebastiaan. “Actos afiliativos y postmemoria: Asuntos pendientes.” Pasavento. Revista de Estudios Hispánicos 2, no. 1 (2014): 137–56.Google Scholar
  8. Fraser, Ben, Malcolm A. Compitello, and Eva Romero. “An AJHCS Editorial Position Paper: A Modest Proposal on Peer Review.” Arizona Journal of Hispanic Cultural Studies 15 (2011): 11–22.Google Scholar
  9. Kristof, Nicholas. “Professors, We Need You!” New York Times. February 15, 2014. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/16/opinion/sunday/kristof-professors-we-need-you.html
  10. Resina, Joan Ramon. “Epilogue: Transatlantic Hispanism or Ibero-Atlanticism?” In Theorising the Ibero-American Atlantic, ed. Harald E. Braun and Lisa Vollendorf, 265–72. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar
  11. ŽiŽek, Slavoj. The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso, 1989.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sebastiaan Faber
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Hispanic StudiesOberlin CollegeOberlinUSA

Personalised recommendations