Advertisement

Can Leadership Become a Profession?

  • Frederik Hertel
  • Michael Fast
Chapter

Abstract

Can leadership become a profession identical with, or at least somehow comparable to, the professions of, for example, nurses, carpenters, physiotherapists? This is the main question we will address in the chapter. Furthermore we will discuss whether leadership is an immanent and latent aspect of professions and whether this is a key difference between profession and leadership. Finally, we will discuss what it would actually take to turn leadership into a new profession comparable to other practices.

Keywords

Leadership as profession Paradox Organizational context Sociology and dialectics 

References

  1. Adorno, Theodor W. 2008. Lectures on Negative Dialectics. Kundli, India: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  2. Andersson, Jan, and Mats Furberg. 1979. Sprog og Påvirkning. København: Nyt Nordisk Forlag Arnold Busck.Google Scholar
  3. Barker, Richard. 2010. “No, Management Is Not a Profession.” Harvard Business Review 88(7):52–60.Google Scholar
  4. Benson, Kenneth J. 1977. “Organizations: A Dialectic View.” Administrative Science Quarterly 22(1):1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, Pierre, and Loïc J.D. Wacquant. 2004. Refleksiv Sociologi. Gylling, Denmark: Hans Reitzels Forlag.Google Scholar
  6. Buber, Martin. 2004. Jeg og Du. Gylling, Denmark: Hans Reitzels Forlag.Google Scholar
  7. Cleary, Thomas, ed. 2004. Zen Lessons: The Art of Leadership. Boston: Shambhala Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Foucault, Michel. 1997. Ethics. Chippenham, UK: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  9. Foucault, Michel. 2009. Security, Territory, Population. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  10. Honneth, Axel. 1995. The Struggle for Recognition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Kirkeby, Ole. 2010. Management Philosophy. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  12. Koris, Riina, Anders Örtenblad, and Triinu Ojala. 2017. “From Maintaining the Status Quo to Promoting Free Thinking and Inquiry.” Management Learning 48:174–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. 2003. Situeret Læring. Gylling, Denmark: Hans Reitzels Forlag.Google Scholar
  14. Lévinas, Emmanuel. 1996. Totalitet og Uendelighed. Gylling, Denmark: Hans Reitzels Forlag.Google Scholar
  15. Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1989. A Diary in the Strict Sense of the Term. London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  16. Mead, George H. 2002. The Philosophy of the Present. New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  17. Mintzberg, Henry. 1989. Mintzberg on Management. New York: Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
  18. Mintzberg, Henry. 2013. Simply Managing. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
  19. Møller, Jørn K. 2007. “Ledelse af Dagtilbud Under Forandring.” Ledelse og Erhvervsøkonomi 71(4):187–94.Google Scholar
  20. Plato. 2004. The Laws. London: Penguin books.Google Scholar
  21. Podolny, Joel. 2009. “The Buck Stops (and Starts) at Business Schools.” Harvard Business Review 87(6):62–7.Google Scholar
  22. Poulfelt, Flemming. 1997. “Professionel Management?” Ledelse og Erhvervsøkonomi 61(1):85–95.Google Scholar
  23. Vedel, Anna, and Dorthe K. Thomsen. 2017. “The Dark Triad Across Academic Majors.” Personality and Individual Difference 116:86–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Xenofon. 2000. Erindringer om Socrates. Gylling, Denmark: Odense Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frederik Hertel
    • 1
  • Michael Fast
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Business and ManagementAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations