Advertisement

Bachelor Programs in Leadership: The Beginning of a Profession

  • Allan Næs Gjerding
  • Kenneth Mølbjerg Jørgensen
  • René Nesgaard Nielsen
  • Jørgen Gulddahl Rasmussen
Chapter

Abstract

Based on an integrative approach to practical wisdom and theoretical knowledge, the chapter proposes a bachelor program on leadership based on four somewhat controversial propositions: First, theoretical learning is relevant only to the extent that students have opportunities for applying theoretical knowledge in practice. Second, relevance is created by including extra-university communities of practice in teaching and education. Third, the major part of the curriculum is created by the students themselves in terms of analyses and practical experience emerging from the interaction with extra-university communities of practices. Fourth, in consequence, while a baseline of competencies is provided by the program, there is no uniform profile because each student specializes differently.

Keywords

Management learning Leadership Phronesis Epistemic reasoning University-industry collaboration 

References

  1. Aristotle. 2009. The Nicomachean Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barker, Richard. 2010. “No, Management Is Not a Profession.” Harvard Business Review 88(7/8):52–60.Google Scholar
  3. Bennis, Warren. 1989. On Becoming a Leader. London: Hutchinson Business Books.Google Scholar
  4. Carroll, Brigid, and Lester Levy. 2008. “Defaulting to Management: Leadership Defined by What It Is Not.” Organization 15(1):75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dobbs, Richard, James Manyika, and Jonathan Woetzel. 2015. No Ordinary Disruption: Forces Breaking All the Trends. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  6. Doh, Jonathan P. 2003. “Can Leadership Be Thaught? Perspectives from Management Educators.” Academy of Management Learning and Education 2(1):54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Drucker, Peter F. 1974. Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  8. Eisner, Elliot W. 2002. “From Episteme to Phronesis to Artistry in the Study and Improvement of Teaching.” Teacher and Teaching Education 18:375–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elmuti, Dean, William Minnis, and Michael Abebe. 2005. “Does Education Have a Role in Developing Leadership Skills?” Management Decision 43(7/8):1018–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Friedman, Thomas L. 2007. The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century (3rd edn.). New York: Picador.Google Scholar
  11. Hill, Linda A. 2003. Becoming a Manager: How New Managers Master the Challenges of Leadership (2nd edn.). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  12. Keohane, Robert O., and Joseph S. Nye. 2000. “Globalization: What’s New? What’s Not. (And So What?).” Foreign Policy 118:104–19.Google Scholar
  13. Kotter, John P. 1990. “What Leaders Really Do.” Harvard Business Review 68(3):103–11.Google Scholar
  14. Khurana, Rakesh, and Nitin Nohria. 2008. “It’s Time to Make Management a True Profession.” Harvard Business Review 86(10):70–7.Google Scholar
  15. Noel, Jana. 1999. “On the Varieties of Phronesis.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 31(3):273–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Northouse, Peter Guy. 2016. Leadership: Theory and Practice (7th edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Yip, Jeffrey, and Joseph A. Raelin. 2011. “Treshold Concepts and Modalities for Teaching Leadership Practice.” Management Learning 43(3):333–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Yukl, Gary. 2013. Leadership in Organizations (8th edn.). Harlow, UK: Pearson.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Allan Næs Gjerding
    • 1
  • Kenneth Mølbjerg Jørgensen
    • 1
  • René Nesgaard Nielsen
    • 1
  • Jørgen Gulddahl Rasmussen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Business and ManagementAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations