Institutionalising Morality: The UN Security Council and the Fundamental Norms of the International Legal Order
This chapter considers the relationship between international law and the role and practice of the UN Security Council. Proceeding from the assumption that all international organizations are constituted, constrained, and empowered by the fundamental moral principles of the international legal order, it explores the way in which the norms of jus cogens have shaped the Security Council’s institutional environment and practice. It suggests that as a manifestation of the moral principles of international law, jus cogens norms have forged and defined the SC beyond the legal framework set out in the UN Charter. At the same time, it shows that the content and relevance of jus cogens itself have been shaped through Security Council successes and failures.
- Aksu, Esref. 2003. The United Nations, Intra-state Peacekeeping and Normative Change. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
- Barry, Buzan. 2014. An Introduction to the English School of International Relations. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Bobbitt, Philip. 2002. The Shield of Achilles: War, Peace and the Course of History. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Bull, Hedley, and Adam Watson. 1984. The Expansion of International Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Clark, Ian. 2005. Legitimacy in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Costello, Cathrun, and Michelle Foster. 2016. Non-refoulement as Custom and Jus Cogens? Putting the Prohibition to the Test. In Netherlands Yearbook of International Law: Jus Cogens Quo Vadis? ed. Maarten den Heijer and Harmen van der Witt, 273–327. The Hague: Asser Press.Google Scholar
- Criddle, Evan J., and Evan Fox-Decent. 2009. A Fiduciary Theory of Jus Cogens. Yale Journal of International Law 34 (2): 331–387.Google Scholar
- D’Amato, Anthony. 1990. It’s a Bird, It’s a Plane, It’s Jus Cogens! Connecticut Journal of International Law 6 (1): 1–6.Google Scholar
- Danilenko, Gennady. 1993. Law Making in the International Community. Dordrecht: Martinius Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
- De Wet, Erika. 2013. Jus Cogens and Obligations Erga Omnes. In The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law, ed. Dina Shelton, 541–561. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Dulles, John Foster. 1950. War or Peace. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Fabius, Laurent. 2013. A Call for Self-Restraint at the UN. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/04/opinion/a-call-for-self-restraint-at-the-un.html?mcubz=1. Accessed 16 June 2017.
- Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect. 2017. http://www.globalr2p.org/resources/335. Accessed 16 June 2017.
- Heieck, John. 2013. Illegal Vetoes in the Security Council – How Russia and China Breached Their Duty Under Jus Cogens to Prevent War Crimes. Opinio Juris. http://opiniojuris.org/2013/08/14/emerging-voices-illegal-vetoes-in-the-security-council-how-russia-and-china-breached-their-duty-under-jus-cogens-to-prevent-war-crimes-in-syria/. Accessed at 12 Jan 2017.
- Higgins, Rosalyn. 2009. Themes and Theories: Selected Essays, Speeches, and Writings in International Law Volume I. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Huber, Max. 1928. Die Soziologischen Grundlagen des Völkerrechtes. Berlin: Rothschild.Google Scholar
- Jackson, Robert. 2000. The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- James, Alan. 1973. Law and Order in International Society. In The Bases of International Order; Essays in Honour of C.A.W. Manning, ed. Alan James, 60–84. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Kolb, Robert. 2015. Peremptory International Law – Jus Cogens: An Inventory. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
- Malone, David M. 2008. Security Council. In The Oxford Handbook on the United Nations, ed. Sam Daws and Thomas G. Weiss, 117–135. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Nardin, Terry. 1998. Legal Positivism as a Theory of International Society. In International Society: Diverse Ethical Perspectives, ed. David Mapel and Terry Nardin, 17–35. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Stephan, Paul B. 2011. The Political Economy of Jus Cogens. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 44 (4): 1073–1104.Google Scholar
- The International Criminal Court. 1992. I.C.J Reports.Google Scholar
- Tomuschat, Christian. 2015. Security Council and Jus Cogens. In The Present and Future of Jus Cogens, ed. Enzo Cannizzaro, 7–98. Roma: Sapienza Universitat Edtricie.Google Scholar
- United Nations. 2013. UN Must Reflect the World as It Is, Not as It Used to Be, Say Ministers from Germany, Liechtenstein. http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=46123#.WVZhYhOGOCQ. Accessed 19 June 2017.
- Weisburd, Mark A. 1995. The Emptiness of the Concept of Jus Cogens as Illustrated by the War in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Michigan Journal of International Law 17 (1): 1–51.Google Scholar
- Weiß, Wolfgang. 2008. Security Council Powers and the Exigencies of Justice After War. In Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, ed. A. von Bogdandy and R. Wolfrum, 45–111. Leiden: Koninkklijke Brill.Google Scholar
- Wheeler, Nicholas. 2000. Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Wight, Martin. 1978. In Power Politics, ed. Hedley Bull and Carsten Holbraad. London: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar