Advertisement

Legal Approaches to Social Control in Australian Schools: Old Ideas and New Trends

  • Sally Varnham
  • Joan Squelch
Chapter

Abstract

Ensuring education in a safe environment falls inevitably on the school. As societal issues enter Australian schools as those elsewhere, there are many new threats added to the old. While legislation and policy traditionally provide the means to assist schools, questions of safety and security focus increasingly on the parameters of control and responsibility. This chapter considers social control within the frame of safety in Australian schools—from ‘traditional’ school discipline and an investigation of trends towards various forms of surveillance to current initiatives designed to reduce many of the threats to young people. These aim to develop school cultures where respect and responsibility are uppermost and which nurture the human capacity for restitution, resolution, and reconciliation.

References

  1. A v Hutchinson [2015] NZCA 214 (5 June 2015).Google Scholar
  2. Aherns, D. (2012). Schools, cyberbullies, and the surveillance state. American Criminal Law Review, 49, 1669–1722.Google Scholar
  3. Alex Purvis on behalf of Daniel Hoggan v New South Wales (Department of Education and Training) (2003) 217 CLR 92.Google Scholar
  4. Anders, J. (2015). Keeping kids in school and out of court: A study of education – Youth justice collaboration in the US. Scotland/Denmark: Winston Churchill Memorial Trust of Australia.Google Scholar
  5. Armstrong, M., & Thorsborne, M. (2005). Restorative responses to bullying. In H. McGrath & T. Noble (Eds.), Bullying solutions: Evidence-based approaches to bullying in Australian schools. Sydney: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  6. Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd (2001). 208 CLR 199.Google Scholar
  7. Bouhours, T. (2007). The journey of the excluded: Schooling and crime in the exclusive society. Thesis PhD Doctorate, Griffith University, Brisbane.Google Scholar
  8. Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative justice and responsive regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Buckley, S., & Maxwell, G. (2007). Respectful schools: Restorative practices in education: A summary report. Wellington: Office of the Commissioner for Children and the Institute of Policy Studies.Google Scholar
  10. Cameron, L., & Thorsborne, M. (1999). Restorative justice and school discipline: Mutually exclusive? International Institute for Restorative Practice. https://www.iirp.edu/eforum-archive/4220-restorative-justice-and-school-disciplinemutuallyexclusive
  11. Cameron, L., & Thorsborne, M. (2001). Restorative justice and school discipline: Mutually exclusive? A practitioner’s view of the impact of community conferencing in Queensland schools. In H. Strang & J. Braithwaite (Eds.), Restorative justice and civil society (pp. 180–194). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. CF (by her tutor Joanne Foster) v New South Wales (Department of Education) [2003] 58 NSWLR 135.Google Scholar
  13. DM v New South Wales (Unreported Supreme Court of New South Wales, Simpson J., 16 September 1997).Google Scholar
  14. Daly, H., & Hayes, H. (2001). Restorative justice and conferencing in Australia. Trends and issues: 186. Australian Institute of Criminology. http://www.aic.govt.au
  15. Davis, B. (1999, March 22). The inappropriateness of the criminal justice system – Indigenous Australian criminological perspective. Paper presented at the 3rd National Outlook Symposium on Crime in Australia, Mapping the boundaries of Australia’s criminal justice system convened by the Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra. http://www.aic.gov.au
  16. Drewery, W. (2014). Restorative practice in New Zealand schools: Social development through relational justice. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(2), 191–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dwyer, A., & Eastel, P. (2013). Cyber bullying in Australian schools. Alternative Law Journal, 38(2), 92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gavrielides, T. (2008). Restorative justice – The perplexing concept: Conceptual fault – Lines and power battles with the restorative justice movement. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 8(2), 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hayden, A. (Ed.). (2001). Restorative conferencing manual of Aotearoa. New Zealand: Department for Courts.Google Scholar
  20. Hirsch, L., Lowen, C., & Santorelli, D. (2012). Bully. New York: Weinstein Books.Google Scholar
  21. Hope, A. (2009). CCTV, school surveillance and social control. British Educational Research Journal, 35(6), 891–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hope, A. (2015). Governmentality and the ‘Selling’ of school surveillance devices. The Sociological Review, 63, 840–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hope, A. (2016). Biopower and school surveillance technologies 2.0. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(7), 885–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jackson, J., & Varnham, S. (2007). Law for educators: School and university law in Australia. Chatswood, Australia: LexisNexis.Google Scholar
  25. Ludbrook, R. (2001, October 3–4). Suspensions and expulsions in Australian schools. Paper presented to Children’s Legal Issues Forum, Sydney.Google Scholar
  26. M & R v Palmerston North Boys High School (2003) NZAR 705 (decided 5 December 1990).Google Scholar
  27. Mallett, C. (2016). The school-to-prison pipeline: A critical review of the punitive paradigm shift. Child Adolescence Social Work Journal, 33, 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mateer, S. (2010). The use of restorative justice practices in a school community traumatized by an incident of planned school violence: A case study. PhD Thesis, Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado.Google Scholar
  29. McCluskey, G., Lloyd, G., Kane, J., Riddell, S., Stead, J., & Weedon, E. (2008). Can restorative practices in schools make a difference? Educational Review, 60(4), 405–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McDoughall & Danks. (2012). Daily Telegraph, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  31. Michail, S. (2011). Understanding school responses to challenging behaviour: A review of literature. Research Paper, Social Justice Unit, Uniting Care: Children, Young People and Families. http://www.education.vic.gov.au
  32. Morrison, B. (2007). Restoring safe school communities: A whole school response to bullying, violence and alienation. Sydney: Federation Press.Google Scholar
  33. Morrison, B., & Vaandering, D. (2012). Restorative justice: Pedagogy, praxis and discipline. Journal of School Violence, 11(2), 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Munro, G., & Midford, R. (2001). ‘Zero tolerance’ and drug education in Australian schools. Drug and Alcohol Review, 20(1), 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nance, J. (2014). School surveillance and the fourth amendment. Wisconsin Law Review, 2014, 79–137.Google Scholar
  36. Office of the Information Commissioner, Queensland. (2015). Information privacy and camera surveillance survey 2015. Queensland State School Sector Survey Report. https://www.oic.qld.gov.au/
  37. Osher, D., Bear, G. G., Sprague, J. R., & Doyle, W. (2010). How can we improve school discipline? Educational Researcher, 39(1), 48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Perry-Hazan, L., & Birnhack, M. (2016). The hidden human rights curriculum of surveillance cameras in schools: Due process, privacy and trust. Cambridge Journal of Education, 1–18.Google Scholar
  39. Rigby, K., & Johnson, K. (2016). The prevalence and effectiveness of anti-bullying strategies employed in Australian schools. Online copy. Accessed December 2016. http://www.unisa.edu.au
  40. Roche, A. M., Pidd, K., Bywood, P., Duraisingam, V., Steenson, T., Freeman, T., & Rooney, T. (2010). Trusting children: How do surveillance technologies alter a child’s experience of trust, risk and responsibility? Surveillance & Society, 7(3/4), 344–354.Google Scholar
  41. Shaw, G. (2007). Restorative practices in Australian schools: Changing relationships, changing culture. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 25(1), 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Squelch, J. (2015). School discipline and the law in Australia. In C. J. Russo, I. Oosthuizen, & C. C. Wolhuter (Eds.), Global interest in student behaviour (pp. 7–27). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  43. Stern, F., & Hill, M. (1996). Peer mediation in schools. Mediation News, 4(2), 4.Google Scholar
  44. Stronger Smarter Institute Limited. (2014). High-expectations relationships: A foundation for quality learning environments in all Australian schools. Stronger Smarter Institute Limited Position Paper.Google Scholar
  45. Sullivan, Ann. (2016, May 27). Schools’ tough approach to bad behaviour isn’t working – And may escalate problems. The Conversation. http://theconversation.com/
  46. Sullivan, A. M., Johnson, B., Owens, L., & Conway, R. (2014). Punish them or engage them? Teachers’ views of unproductive student behaviours in the classroom. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(6), 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Taylor, N. (2002). State surveillance and the right to privacy. Surveillance and Society, 1(1), 66–85.Google Scholar
  48. Taylor, E. (2010). I spy with my little eye: The use of CCTV in schools and the impact on privacy. The Sociological Review, 58(3), 381–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Taylor, E. (2013). Surveillance schools: Security, discipline, and control in contemporary education. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Taylor, G. (2015, June 10). Schools monitoring pupils’ web use with ‘anti-radicalisation software’. The Guardian, UK.Google Scholar
  51. Taylor, E. (2017). This is not America: Cultural mythscapes, Media representation and the anatomy of the surveillance school in Australia. The Sociological Review, 53(2), 413–429.Google Scholar
  52. Taylor, E., & Rooney, T. (Eds.). (2017). Surveillance futures. social and ethical implications of new technologies for children and young people. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Taylor, E. (2018). Student drug testing and the surveillance school economy: An analysis of media representation and policy transfer in Australian schools. Journal of Education Policy, 33(3), 383–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Thorsborne, M., & Vinegrad, D. (2002). Breaking Ground: First Steps in Restorative Practices. SWAP – Student Wellbeing Action Partnership, www.edfac.unimelb.edu.au/swap
  55. Tinker v. Des Moines Sch. Dist., 393 U.S. 503 (1969)Google Scholar
  56. Tucker, J. W., & Vance, A. (2016). School surveillance: The consequences for equity and privacy. Education Leaders Report, 2(4), 1–22. National Association of State.Google Scholar
  57. Vaandering, D. (2011). A faithful compass: Rethinking restorative justice to find clarity. Contemporary Justice Review, 14(3), 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Varnham, S., Evers, M., Booth, T., & Avgoustinos, C. (2014/2015a). Democracy in schools: Encouraging responsibility and citizenship through student participation in school decision making. International Journal of Law and Education, 19(1)/20(1), 73–91.Google Scholar
  59. Varnham, S., Evers, M., & Booth, T. (2014/2015b). Valuing their voices: Encouraging responsibility and citizenship through student participation in school decision making. International Journal of Law and Education, 19(2)/20(1), 23–40.Google Scholar
  60. Wachtel, T. (2016). International institute for restorative practices.Google Scholar
  61. Zehr, H. (2002). The little book of restorative justice. Intercourse: Good Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sally Varnham
    • 1
  • Joan Squelch
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Technology SydneyUltimoAustralia
  2. 2.The University of Notre Dame AustraliaFremantleAustralia

Personalised recommendations