Advertisement

Managing Knowledge and Learning for Process Improvement: A Software-Mediated Process Assessment Approach for IT Service Management

  • Anup Shrestha
  • Eric Kong
  • Aileen Cater-Steel
Chapter

Abstract

As business users increasingly rely upon services from their information technology (IT) service providers, the demand for process improvements in IT services will continue to grow. Although service outcome measures, such as customer satisfaction, may represent the desired end result of IT services, validated assessment of processes provides an important additional element to process improvement efforts, as they may determine actions that could be taken to improve IT services. In the fast-changing and dynamic business environment, IT service organisations must continue to improve their learning processes, create knowledge and implement best practices that allow them to be able to deliver innovative and adaptive value-adding services to their clients. In this chapter, we describe how we applied the software-mediated process assessment (SMPA) approach to assist IT service organisations to conduct process assessments in a transparent and cost-effective manner. In addition, we introduce a knowledge management (KM) process cycle that illustrates how KM and learning processes may be used concurrently to achieve process improvement within the SMPA approach for maximum impact in the IT service management (ITSM) sector. We introduce and discuss three innovative strategies using the SMPA approach to conduct process assessments in the ITSM sector. The practical strategies include (1) adopting the international standards for assessments; (2) facilitating assessments using a decision support system (DSS) tool; and (3) incorporating process assessments for managing knowledge and learning processes. A KM process cycle along with the SMPA approach is introduced. Key value propositions of the SMPA approach are highlighted.

Keywords

Knowledge management Learning process Process improvement Software-mediated process assessment approach IT service management 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by an Australian Research Council (ARC) Linkage grant. We thank Mr Paul Collins, CEO of Assessment Portal for his support in providing the platform for the DSS tool. Note. ITIL® is a Registered Trade Mark of AXELOS Limited.

References

  1. d’Armagnac, S. (2015). Issues in the management of embedded knowledge in project-based organisations: The project actor’s role. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 13(4), 446–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aakhus, M. (2007). Conversations for reflection. In C. R. McInerney & R. E. Day (Eds.), Rethinking knowledge management: From knowledge objects to knowledge processes (pp. 1–20). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  3. Alter, S. L. (1980). Decision support systems: Current practice and continuing challenge. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  4. Barafort, B., Betry, V., Cortina, S., Picard, M., St-Jean, M., Renault, A., & Valdès, O. (2009). ITSM process assessment supporting ITIL. Zaltbommel: Van Haren Publishing.Google Scholar
  5. Bardhan, I. R., Demirkan, H., Kannan, P., Kauffman, R. J., & Sougstad, R. (2010). An interdisciplinary perspective on IT services management and service science. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(4), 13–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Basili, V. R., Caldiera, G., Rombach, H. D., & van Solingen, R. (2002). Goal question metric (GQM) approach. J. Marciniak: Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, 1, 578–583.Google Scholar
  8. Becerra-Fernandez, I., & Sabherwal, R. (2015). Knowledge management: Systems and processes. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Becker, K. (2010). Facilitating unlearning during implementation of new technology. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 23(3), 251–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bhatnagar, J. (2006). Measuring organisational learning capability in Indian managers and establishing firm performance linkage: An empirical analysis. The Learning Organisation, 13(5), 416–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boal, K. B., & Hooijberg, R. (2000). Strategic leadership research: Moving on. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 515–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bontis, N., & Serenko, A. (2007). The moderating role of human capital management practices on employee capabilities. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(3), 31–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chesbrough, H., & Spohrer, J. (2006). A research manifesto for services science. Communications of the ACM, 49(7), 35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi-dimensional framework of organisational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1154–1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fayad, M. E., & Laitinen, M. (1997). Process assessment considered wasteful. Communications of the ACM, 40(11), 125–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garud, R. (1997). On the distinction between know-how, know-what, and know-why. In J. P. Walsh & A. S. Huff (Eds.), Advances in strategic management (Vol. 14, pp. 81–101). Greenwich: JAI Press Limited.Google Scholar
  17. Harkness, W. L., Kettinger, W. J., & Segars, A. H. (1996). Sustaining process improvement and innovation in the information services function: Lessons learned at the Bose Corporation. MIS Quarterly, 20(3), 349–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ireland, R. D., & Hitt, M. A. (1999). Achieving and maintaining strategic competitiveness in the 21st century: The role of strategic leadership. Academy of Management Executive, 13(1), 43–57.Google Scholar
  19. ISO/IEC. (2004). ISO/IEC 15504-2:2004 – Information technology – Process assessment – Part 2: Performing an assessment. Geneva: International Organisation for Standardisation.Google Scholar
  20. ISO/IEC. (2011a). ISO/IEC 20000-1:2011 – Information technology – Service management – Part 1: Service management system requirements. Geneva: International Organisation for Standardisation.Google Scholar
  21. ISO/IEC. (2011b). ISO/IEC 25010:2011 – Systems and software engineering – Systems and software quality requirements and evaluation (SQuaRE) – System and software quality models. Geneva: International Organisation for Standardisation.Google Scholar
  22. Juran, J. M., & Godfrey, A. B. (1999). Juran’s quality handbook (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  23. Kapeleris, J. (2010). “Applied” knowledge is power. Published on 29 November 2010, (Blog). http://johnkapeleris.com/blog/?p=502. Accessed 29 June 2017.
  24. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The Balanced scorecard – Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–79.Google Scholar
  25. Kong, E., Chadee, D., & Raman, R. (2013). Managing Indian IT professionals for global competitiveness: The role of human resource practices in developing knowledge and learning capabilities for innovation. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 11(4), 334–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kongpichayanond, P. (2009). Knowledge management for sustained competitive advantage in mergers and acquisitions. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11(3), 375–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kraut, R., Olson, J., Banaji, M., Bruckman, A., Cohen, J., & Couper, M. (2004). Psychological research online: Report of board of scientific affairs’ advisory group on the conduct of research on the internet. American Psychologist, 59(2), 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Massingham, P., & Holaibi, M. A. (2017). Embedding knowledge management into business processes. Knowledge and Process Management, 24(1), 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Murray, P., & Chapman, R. (2003). From continuous improvement to organisational learning: Developmental theory. Learning Organization, 10(5), 272–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Newman, V. (1997). Redefining knowledge management to deliver competitive advantage. Journal of Knowledge Management, 1(2), 123–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Hirata, T. (2008). Managing flow: A process theory of the knowledge-based firm. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pertusa-Ortega, E. M., Molina-Azorín, J. F., & Claver-Cortés, E. (2010). Competitive strategy, structure and firm performance: A comparison of the resource-based view and the contingency approach. Management Decision, 48(8), 1282–1303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Power, D., Burstein, F., & Sharda, R. (2011). Reflections on the past and future of decision support systems: Perspective of eleven Pioneers. In D. Schuff, D. Paradice, F. Burstein, D. J. Power, & R. Sharda (Eds.), Decision support (pp. 25–48). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pries-Heje, J, Baskerville, R, & Venable, J. R. (2008). Strategies for design science research evaluation. In 16th European conference on information systems. Galway.Google Scholar
  36. Quinn, J. B., Anderson, P., & Finkelstein, S. (1996). Managing professional intellect: Making the most of the best. Harvard Business Review, 74(2), 71–80.Google Scholar
  37. Rudd, C., & Sansbury, J. (2013). ITIL® maturity model and self-assessment service: User guide. Norwich: AXELOS Limited.Google Scholar
  38. Schimpf, H. (2015). Competitive intelligence and knowledge management: A study of enhancing the employees’ motivation to sharing their knowledge. Hamburg: Anchor Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
  39. Shrestha, A. (2015). Development and evaluation of a software-mediated process assessment approach in IT service management. Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Queensland.Google Scholar
  40. Shrestha, A., Cater-Steel, A., & Toleman, M. (2016). Innovative decision support for IT service management. Journal of Decision Systems, 25(S1), 486–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sprague, R. H., Jr. (1980). A framework for the development of decision support systems. MIS Quarterly, 4(4), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. TSO. (2011). The Official introduction to the ITIL service lifecycle. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  43. Tsoukas, H., & Mylonopoulos, N. (2004). Introduction: Knowledge construction and creation in organisations. British Journal of Management, 15(S1), S1–S8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang, H. C., He, J., & Mahoney, J. T. (2009). Firm-specific knowledge resources and competitive advantage: The roles of economic – And relationship-based employee governance mechanisms. Strategic Management Journal, 30(12), 1265–1285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wernerfelt, B. (1995). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after. Strategic Management Journal, 16(3), 171–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wong, D. (2014). Here are the biggest IT challenges in financial services industry. Asian Banking & Finance, viewed 26 June 2017, http://asianbankingandfinance.net/blogs-opinion/commentary/here-are-biggest-it-challenges-in-financial-services-industry.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anup Shrestha
    • 1
  • Eric Kong
    • 1
  • Aileen Cater-Steel
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Management & Enterprise, Faculty of Business, Education, Law and ArtsUniversity of Southern QueenslandToowoombaAustralia

Personalised recommendations