Advertisement

Knowledge Management and Communities of Practice: Supporting Successful Knowledge Transfer

  • Deborah Blackman
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter presents the story of a community of practice that was initially emergent and then organisationally supported. Although much has been written about communities of practice and how they can support learning, it has also been widely acknowledged that institutionalising communities of practice can be challenging, with many failing to deliver on their promise. Of interest in this chapter is how the community in question was supported in ways that enabled it to remain a true community of practice, while creating real value for both the organisation and members of the community. A qualitative research case design revealed three distinctive themes in terms of why the community remained successful both in its ongoing membership and its capacity to create and transfer knowledge: recognition of value adding by both the members and the organisation; the role of personnel support in the community of practice; and championship not management. Each of these is considered in turn. Overall, the lessons are that the capacity to successfully transfer knowledge was based upon organic, bottom-up growth; continued focus on maintaining its core purpose; high levels of stakeholder trust; and supportive governance structures.

References

  1. Ardichvili, A., Page, V., & Wentling, T. (2003). Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(1), 64–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Argote, L. (1999). Organizational learning: Creating, retaining, and transferring knowledge. Norwell: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  3. Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 150–169. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailey, A. (2013). Once the capacity development initiative is over: Using communities of practice theory to transform individual into social learning. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 20(4), 429–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2013.846871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barber, K. D., Munive-Hernandez, J. E., & Keane, J. P. (2006). Process-based knowledge management system for continuous improvement. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 23(8), 1002–1018. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710610688185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barbour, R. S. (2001). Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: A case of the tail wagging the dog? British Medical Journal, 322(7294), 1115–1117. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bertram, R., Culver, D. M., & Gilbert, W. (2016). Creating value in a sport coach community of practice: A collaborative inquiry. International Sport Coaching Journal, 3, 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1123/iscj.2014-0122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blackman, D., & Kennedy, M. (2009). Knowledge management and effective university governance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(6), 547–563. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270910997187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blackman, D., Connelly, J., & Henderson, S. (2005). Beyond all reasonable doubt? Epistemological problems of the learning organisation. Philosophy of Management, 5(3), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.5840/pom20055311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blackman, D. A., Buick, F., O’Donnell, M., O’Flynn, J. L., & West, S. (2012). Developing high performance: Performance management in the Australian Public Service. http://www.apsc.gov.au/working-in-the-aps/performance/performance-management-directions/performance-framework/related-research/conceptual-performance-framework
  11. Blackman, D. A., Buick, F., O’Donnell, M., O’Flynn, J. L., & West, S. (2013). Strengthening the performance framework: Towards a high performance APS. Australian Public Service Commission. http://www.apsc.gov.au/publications-and-media/current-publications/ strengthening-performance
  12. Borzillo, S. (2009). Top management sponsorship to guide communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(3), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270910962879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Breu, K., & Hemingway, C. (2002). Collaborative processes and knowledge creation in communities-of-practice. Creativity and Innovation Management, 11(3), 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8691.00247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burford, S., Kennedy, M., Ferguson, S., & Blackman, D. (2011). Discordant theories of strategic management and emergent practice in knowledge-intensive organizations. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 12(3). http://www.tlainc.com/articl275.htm.
  16. Cook, S. D. N., & Brown, J. S. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10(4), 381–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Corso, M., Giacobbe, A., & Martini, A. (2009). Designing and managing business communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(3), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270910962888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cox, A. (2005). What are communities of practice? A comparative review of four seminal works. Journal of Information Science, 31(6), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551505057016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Cullen, J. (1999). Socially constructed learning: A commentary on the concept of the learning organisation. The Learning Organization, 6(1), 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dixon, N. (2000). Common knowledge: How companies thrive by sharing what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  22. Duguid, P. (2005). “The art of knowing”: Social and tacit dimensions of knowledge and the limits of the community of practice. The Information Society, 21, 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Earl, M. J. (2001). Knowledge management strategies: Toward a taxonomy. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fosnot, C. T. (Ed.). (2005). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives and practice (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  27. Fuller, A. (2007). Critiquing the theories of learning and communities of practice. In J. Hughes, N. Jewson, & L. Unwin (Eds.), Communities of practice: Critical perspectives (pp. 17–29). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Fuller, A., & Unwin, L. (2005). Older and wiser?: Workplace learning from the perspective of experienced employees. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 24(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/026037042000317329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Goh, S. C. (2002). Managing effective knowledge transfer: An integrative framework and some practice implications. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(1), 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Goulding, C. (2005). Grounded theory, ethnography and phenomenology: A comparative analysis of three qualitative strategies for marketing research. European Journal of Marketing, 39(3/4), 294–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Government of Canada. (2016). Population of the federal public service by department. Government of Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/treasury-board-secretariat/services/innovation/human-resources-statistics/population-federal-public-service-department.html
  32. Green, W., Ruutz, A., Houghton, L., & Hibbins, R. (2016). Enabling stories: Narrative, leadership, learning and identity in a faculty-based teaching community of practice. In J. McDonald & A. Cater-Steel (Eds.), Implementing communities of practice in higher education (pp. 159–181). Sydney: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Handley, K., Sturdy, A., Fincham, R., & Clark, T. (2006). Within and beyond communities of practice: Making sense of learning through participation, identity and practice. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 641–653. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00605.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hartley, J. (2004). Case study research. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 323–333). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hopf, C. (2004). Qualitative interviews: An overview. In U. Flick, E. von Kardorff, & I. Steinke (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 203–208). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Houle, G. (2012). National managers’ community marks decade of leadership. Canadian Government Executive, 17(4). http://www.canadiangovernmentexecutive.com/leadership/item/219-national-managers-community-marks-decade-of-leadership.html
  37. Hughes, J., Jewson, N., & Unwin, L. (Eds.). (2007). Communities of practice: Critical perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Jewson, N. (2007). Communities of practice in their place. In J. Hughes, N. Jewson, & L. Unwin (Eds.), Communities of practice: Critical perspectives (pp. 156–170). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kerno, S. J. (2008). Limitations of communities of practice. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 15(1), 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (2006). Learning and pedagogy in communities of practice. In J. Leach & B. Moon (Eds.), Learners and Pedagogy (pp. 21–33). City Road, London: Paul Chapman Publishing.Google Scholar
  42. Lyles, M. A. (2014). Organizational learning, knowledge creation, problem formulation and innovation in messy problems. European Management Journal, 32(1), 132–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2013.05.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Moon, K., & Blackman, D. (2014). A guide to understanding social science research for natural scientists. Conservation Biology, 28(5), 1167–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Morgan, S. L. (2011). Social learning among organic farmers and the application of the communities of practice framework. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 17(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2011.536362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S., & Yanow, D. (2003). Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach. London: M.E. Sharpe Inc.Google Scholar
  46. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/2635068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. (2015). The knowledge-creating theory revisited: Knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. In J. S. Edwards (Ed.), The essentials of knowledge management (pp. 95–110). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  48. Nonaka, I., von Krogh, G., & Voelpel, S. (2006). Organizational knowledge creation theory: Evolutionary paths and future advances. Organization Studies, 27(8), 1179–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Noy, C. (2008). Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4), 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570701401305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Oksanen, K., & Ståhle, P. (2013). Physical environment as a source for innovation: Investigating the attributes of innovative space. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(6), 815–827. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-04-2013-0136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Perren, L., & Ram, M. (2004). Case-study method in small business and entrepreneurial research mapping boundaries and perspectives. International Small Business Journal, 22(1), 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Probst, G., & Borzillo, S. (2008). Why communities of practice succeed and why they fail. European Management Journal, 26, 335–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Probst, G., Raub, S., & Romhardt, K. (2000). Managing knowledge building blocks for success. Chichester: Willey.Google Scholar
  55. Quinn, J. B. (1985). Managing innovation: Controlled Chaos. Harvard Business Review, 63(3), 73–84.Google Scholar
  56. Ranjbarfard, M., Aghdasi, M., López-Sáez, P., & López, J. E. N. (2014). The barriers of knowledge generation, storage, distribution and application that impede learning in gas and petroleum companies. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(3), 494–522. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-08-2013-0324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Elam, G., Tennant, R., & Rahim, N. (2014). Designing and selecting samples. In J. Ritchie, J. Lewis, C. M. Nicholls, & R. Ormston (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (pp. 111–146). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  58. Roberts, J. (2006). Limits to communities of practice. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 623–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schwandt, T. (1998). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues (pp. 221–259). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  60. Sheng, M. L., Chang, S.-Y., Teo, T., & Lin, Y.-F. (2013). Knowledge barriers, knowledge transfer, and innovation competitive advantage in healthcare settings. Management Decision, 51(3), 461–478. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741311309607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Snowden, D. J. (2000). New wine in old wineskins: From organic to complex knowledge management through the use of story. Emergence, 2(4), 50–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Snyder, W. M., & Wenger, E. (2010). Our world as a learning system: A communities-of-practice approach. In C. Blackmore (Ed.), Social learning systems and communities of practice. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  63. Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. New York: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  64. Storberg-Walker, J. (2008). Wenger’s communities of practice revisited: A (failed?) exercise in applied communities of practice theory-building research. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10(4), 555–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422308319541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Szulanski, G. (2000). The process of knowledge transfer: A diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 82, 9–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tsoukas, H., & Vladimirou, E. (2001). What is organizational knowledge? Journal of Management Studies, 38(7), 973–993. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tzortzaki, A. M., & Mihiotis, A. (2014). A review of knowledge management theory and future directions. Knowledge and Process Management, 21(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Venkitachalam, K., & Willmott, H. (2015). Factors shaping organizational dynamics in strategic knowledge management. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 13, 344. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2013.54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2000). “It is what one does”: Why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(2–3), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8687(00)00045-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wenger, E. (2010). Conceptual tools for CoPs as social learning systems: Boundaries, identity, trajectories and participation. In C. Blackmore (Ed.), Social learning systems and communities of practice. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  74. Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  75. Wenger, E., Trayner, B., & De Laat, M. (2011). Promoting and assessing value creation in communities and networks: A conceptual framework (Research Report No. 18). Ruud de Moor Centrum, Open University of the Netherlands. http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic1116077.files/Assessing%20Learning%20Communities.pdf
  76. Yahya, S., & Goh, W.-K. (2002). Managing human resources toward achieving knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(5), 457–468. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270210450414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Yang, C.-W., Fang, S.-C., & Linc, J. L. (2010). Organisational knowledge creation strategies: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Information Management, 30(3), 231–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Yanow, D. (2004). Translating local knowledge at organizational peripheries. British Journal of Management, 15(S1), S9–S25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2004.t01-1-00403.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  80. Zwolski, K. (2016). Integrating crisis early warning systems: Power in the community of practice. Journal of European Integration, 38(4), 393–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2016.1138944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deborah Blackman
    • 1
  1. 1.School of BusinessUNSW CanberraCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations