Methods for Integrated Sustainability Assessment: The Case of Small Holder Farming in Karnataka, South India
Small farm holders in India face multifold challenges to sustain their livelihoods. Rapid urbanization, increasing cost of cultivation, degraded natural resources, low productivity, and price uncertainties are major challenges that Indian farmers in general and small and marginal ones, in particular, face today. Based on a policy change in the state of Karnataka, in south-western India, the chapter examines potential integrated methods and tools for assessing sustainability of small holder farmers. An integration of potential qualitative and quantitative tools gives a different perspective towards strategies for supporting sustainable farming practices by small holders. The results also suggest that effective policy design, efficient governance structure, and vibrant local institutions are essential for small farmers’ sustainable future.
KeywordsIntegrated assessment Sustainable farming Small farmers Karnataka
- Abraham, V. 2009. Employment Growth in Rural India: Distress-Driven? EPW 44 (16): 79–94.Google Scholar
- Acharya, S.S., and R.L. Jogi. 2004. Farm Input Subsidies in Indian Agriculture. Agricultural Economics Research Review 17 (1): 11–41.Google Scholar
- Bhalla, G.S., and G. Singh. 2009. Economic Liberalisation and Indian Agriculture: A Statewise Analysis. EPW 44 (52): 37–44.Google Scholar
- Bhattacharyya, P., and G. Chakraborty. 2005. Current Status of Organic Farming in India and Other Countries. Indian Journal of Fertilizers 1 (9): 111–123.Google Scholar
- Chand, R., P.A.L. Prasanna, and A. Singh. 2011. Farm Size and Productivity: Understanding the Strengths of Smallholders and Improving Their Livelihoods. Economic and Political Weekly 46 (26 & 27): 5–11.Google Scholar
- DES. 2010. Agricultural Census. Directorate of Economics and Statistics.Google Scholar
- Dev, M. 2012. Policies for Raising Agricultural Growth and Productivity in India. IGIDR Proceedings PP-069-SMDI. Google Scholar
- Deshpande, R.S. 2002. Suicides by Farmers in Karnataka: Agrarian Distress and Possible Alleviatory Steps. Economic and Political Weekly 37 (26): 2601–2610.Google Scholar
- ———. 2008. Rapporteur’s Report on Rainfed Agriculture. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics 63 (3): 565–576.Google Scholar
- Government of Karnataka. 2006. Karnataka State Policy on Organic Farming. Commissionerate of Agriculture. http://raitamitra.kar.nic.in/kda_booklet.pdf. Accessed 21 Nov 2010.
- Gulati A., P.K. Joshi, and M. Landen, ed. 2008. Contract Farming in India: A Resource Book. http://www.ncap.res.in/contract_%20farming/Resources/2.1%20Ashok%20Gulati.pdf. Accessed 22 Sept 2011.
- Human Development Report. 2016. Karnataka State Human Development Report. Planning Commission.Google Scholar
- India Economic Survey. 2010–11. http://indiabudget.nic.in/survey.asp.
- Jha, D. 2003. Policy Drift in Agriculture. EPW 38 (47), November 22–28.Google Scholar
- MoEF. 2001. State of the Environment Report: Land Degradation. http://moef.nic.in/soer/2001/ind_land.pdf.
- Morris, Jake Breton, Valentina Tassone, Rudolf de Groot, Marguerite Camilleri, and Stefano Moncada. 2011. A Framework for Participatory Impact Assessment: Involving Stakeholders in European Policy Making, A Case Study of Land Use Change in Malta. Ecology and Society 16 (1): 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Narayanamoorthy, A., and S.S. Kalamkar. 2005. Indebtedness of Farmer Households Across States: Recent Trends, Status and Determinants. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics 60 (3): 290–301.Google Scholar
- Pretty, J.N. 1995. Regenerating Agriculture: Policies and Practice for Sustainability and Self-reliance. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
- Pretty, J., G. Smith, K.W.T. Goulding, S.J. Groves, I. Henderson, R.E. Hine, V. King, J. van Oostrum, D.J. Pendlington, J.K. Vis, and C. Walter. 2008. Multi-year Assessment of Unilever’s Progress Towards Agricultural Sustainability I: Indicators, Methodology and Pilot Farm Results. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 6 (1): 37–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Purushothaman, S., and S. Kashyap. 2010. Trends in Land Use and Crop Acreages in Karnataka and Their Repercussions. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Science 23 (2): 330–333.Google Scholar
- Purushothaman, S., S. Patil, I. Francis, H.J. König, P. Reidsma, and S. Hegde. 2012a. Participatory Impact Assessment of Agricultural Practices Using the Land Use Functions Framework: Case Study from India. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2012.721005.
- ———. 2012c. Assessing the Impacts of Policy-Driven Agricultural Practices in Karnataka, India. Sustainability Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-012-0188-y.
- Purushothaman, S., S. Patil, I. Patil, I. Francis, and I. Nesheim. 2013. Policy and Governance for Sustaining Livelihoods and Natural Resources in Small Farms: A Case Study in Karnataka. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68 (2): 240–257.Google Scholar
- Rajivlochan, M. 2008. Rejuvenating Agriculture with the Help of the Small Farmers. Economic and Political Weekly 43 (11): 17–21.Google Scholar
- Reddy, D.N., and S. Mishra. 2009. Agrarian Crisis in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Reddy, B.S. 2011. Dynamics of Soil Fertility Management Practices in Semi-Arid Regions: A Case Study of AP. Economic and Political Weekly 51 (3): 56–63.Google Scholar
- Singh, K. 2009. Environmental Degradation and Measures for Its Mitigation with Special Reference to India’s Agricultural Sector. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economy 64 (1): 40–61. Lozano.Google Scholar
- State of the Environment Report. 2003. Environmental Management and Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar