Advertisement

Ethical Issues Related to Payday Lending

  • Chris Robinson
  • Denys Robinson
Chapter

Abstract

Payday lending has been the subject of strong ethical criticism often by consumer advocates and some academics. What is the nature of these ethical criticisms and how strong are they? This chapter uses consequentialist and corporate social responsibility perspectives. Through these analyses the authors argue that the ethical critique that the payday loan industry receives is, in part, justified. It exploits vulnerable groups, harms many who get caught in debt traps, and overcharges every responsible borrower.

References

  1. Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada. 2013. Aboriginal Income Disparity in Canada. https://www.aadnc-aandc.gc.ca/eng/1378411773537/1378411859280. Accessed 24 April 2017.
  2. Baradaran, M. 2015. How the Other Half Banks. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruser, David. 2016. XCash Offers High Interest Loans to Toronto Nannies—But the Rates Are Sometimes Over the Legal Limits. Toronto Star. https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2016/10/07/xcash-offers-high-interest-loans-to-toronto-nannies-but-the-rates-are-sometimes-over-the-legal-limit.htm. Accessed 27 February 2017.
  4. Center for Responsible Lending. 2005. Access Denied. CRL Issue Brief, No. 23, January 5. http://www.responsiblelending.org/payday-lending/policy-legislation/states/ib023-Access_Denied_HBCU_Payday-0105.pdf. Accessed 22 January 2011.
  5. Consumers Council of Canada. 2015. Consumer Experiences in Online Payday Loans. https://www.consumerscouncil.com/site/consumers_council_of_canada/assets/pdf/ccc_online_payday_loans_web.pdf
  6. Ernst & Young. 2004. The Cost of Providing Payday Loans in Canada. Ernst & Young, Tax Policy Services Group.Google Scholar
  7. Heath, J., ed. 2014. Morality, Competition, and the Firm: The Market Failures Approach to Business Ethics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Kant, I. 1964. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. H.J. Patron. New York: Harper & Row Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
  9. King, U., W. Lei, D. Davis, and K. Ernst. 2005. Race Matters: The Concentration of Payday Lenders in African-American Neighborhoods. Center for Responsible Lending Research Report, March 22. http://www.responsiblelending.org/pdfs/rr006-Race_Matters_Payday_in_NC-0305.pdf. Accessed 22 January 2011.
  10. Mayer, R. 2013. When and Why Usury Should Be Prohibited. Journal of Business Ethics 116 (3): 513–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Robinson, C., and M. Schwartz. 2017. A Corporate Social Responsibility Analysis of Payday Lending. http://ssrn.com/abstract=3044087, forthcoming in Business and Society Review, 2018.
  12. Sample, Ruth J. 2003. Exploitation: What It Is and Why It’s Wrong. Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  13. Schwartz, M.S., and A.B. Carroll. 2003. Corporate Social Responsibility: A Three Domain Approach. Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (4): 503–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wertheimer, Alan. 1996. Exploitation. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris Robinson
    • 1
  • Denys Robinson
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Liberal Arts and Professional Studies, School of Administrative StudiesYork UniversityTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Masters student, Public Policy and Administration, Ryerson UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations