Advertisement

Fundación Propaz: The Evolution of a Mediation and Peacebuilding Strategy in Guatemala

  • Ruth J. Parsons
  • Tamra Pearson d’Estrée
  • Andrés Álvarez Castañeda
  • Carlos Alberto Sarti Castañeda
Chapter
Part of the Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies book series (RCS)

Abstract

This chapter documents the development, practices, and processes of Fundación Propaz, a nonprofit organization, founded in 2003 in Guatemala, to promote consolidation of peace, democracy, good governance, and the prevention and settlement of conflicts at the end of Guatemala’s 36-year Civil War. Originating from the Organization of American States, during the Peace Accords of 1998, Fundación Propaz was aided in its early development by expertise offered through conflict resolution trainers from US scholars, and has evolved into a uniquely hybrid model of intervention consisting of basic tenets of Western institutional models and traditional indigenous practices.

Keywords

Fundación Propaz Conflict resolution Peace Accords Mayan communities Mediation Dialogue Skill Development Leadership Cultural contextualization Mediation strategies Empowerment 

References

  1. Argyris, C. (1976). Single-loop and double-loop models in research on decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(3), 363–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnson, C. (1997). Guatemala Unidad Revolucionaria Nacional Guatemalateca. International Legal Materials, 36(2), 258–339.Google Scholar
  3. Krauss, C. (1991). Inside Central America: Its people, politics, and history. New York: Summit Books.Google Scholar
  4. Organization of American States, General Assembly. (1997, June 4). AGRES1466XXVIIO97. Retrieved from http://www.oas.org/sap/peacefund/VirtualLibrary/SupportBuildingDemocratizationPeaceGuatemal/RelatedResolutions/AGRES1466XXVIIO97.doc
  5. Organization of American States, General Assembly. (2000, June 5). [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.oas.org/sap/peacefund/VirtualLibrary/SupportBuildingDemocratizationPeaceGuatemal/RelatedResolutions/AGRES1703XXXO00.doc
  6. Proyectos, Propaz. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.propaz.org.gt/2014-01-31-00-00-31/proyectos
  7. Santley, R. S., Killion, T. W., & Lycett, M. T. (1986). On the Maya collapse. Journal of Anthropological Research, 42(2), 123–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Shamsie, Y. (2007). Moving beyond mediation: The OAS transforming conflict in Guatemala. Global Governance, 13(3), 409–425. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/27800669?ref=search-gateway:b40e74a74a96cc88ba496e3c9e6984b1 Google Scholar
  9. Sieder, R. (2011). Contested sovereignties: Indigenous law, violence and state effects in postwar Guatemala. Critique of Anthropology, 31(3), 161–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. United States, Department of State, Institute of Peace. (2016). Guatemala, Profile. Retrieved from https://www.usip.org/publications/1997/02/truth-commission-guatemala
  11. United States, Organization of American States. (2016, March 18). Esquipulas II Accords. Retrieved from http://www.oas.org/sap/peacefund/VirtualLibrary/virtualLibrary.html#57

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruth J. Parsons
    • 1
  • Tamra Pearson d’Estrée
    • 1
  • Andrés Álvarez Castañeda
    • 2
  • Carlos Alberto Sarti Castañeda
    • 3
  1. 1.Conflict Resolution InstituteUniversity of DenverDenverUSA
  2. 2.Universidad de Valle de GuatemalaGuatemala CityGuatemala
  3. 3.Fundación ProPazGuatemala CityGuatemala

Personalised recommendations