Advertisement

The Proliferation of Consent-Focused Rape Prevention Social Marketing Materials

  • Melanie Ann Beres
Chapter

Abstract

The use of sexual consent in sexual violence prevention materials is rapidly growing. This chapter explores these materials and places them in conversation with insights from feminist research on sexual violence. Beres argues that consent-focused sexual violence prevention materials are inconsistent with current feminist understandings of the role of consent in sexual-violence prevention. Three concerns are raised: (1) The materials can create confusion through simultaneously presenting definitions of consent as “fact” and go beyond legal definitions of consent; (2) they are inconsistent with feminist research and presume an ignorant subject unfamiliar with consent negotiation; and (3) the creation of gender-neutral subjects within prevention materials fails to acknowledge the gendered aspect of sexual violence curtailing the ability for this type of sexual violence prevention to foster change. Through this analysis, Beres orients the reader toward the possibilities of building on feminist theorising to strengthen consent-focused education materials.

Works Cited

  1. Avalon Sexual Assault Centre. ‘Sexual Assault’: Sexual Assault: Why talk about it? 2010: 1–4.Google Scholar
  2. Australian Law Reform Commission. Family Violence-A National Legal Response. Vol. 1. Canberra, Australia: N.p., 2010. Web.Google Scholar
  3. Barker, Gary, Christene Ricardo, and Marcos Nascimento. Engaging Men and Boys in Changing Gender-Based Inequity in Health: Evidence from Programme Interventions. N.p., 2007. Web.Google Scholar
  4. Beres, Melanie Ann. ‘Rethinking the Concept of Consent for Anti-Sexual Violence Activism and Education.’ Feminism & Psychology 24.3 (2014): 373–389. Web. 27 Sept. 2014.Google Scholar
  5. Beres, Melanie Ann. ‘Sexual Miscommunication? Untangling Assumptions about Sexual Communication between Casual Sex Partners.’ Culture, Health & Sexuality 12.1 (2010): 1–14. Web.Google Scholar
  6. Beres, Melanie Ann. ‘“Spontaneous” Sexual Consent: An Analysis of Sexual Consent Literature.’ Feminism & Psychology 17.1 (2007): 93–108. Web.Google Scholar
  7. Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. ‘Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.’ Qualitative Research in Psychology 3.2 (2006): 77–101. Web.Google Scholar
  8. Brownmiller, S. Against Our Will: Men Women and Rape. New York: Penguin Books, 1975. Print.Google Scholar
  9. Cahill, Ann J. ‘Feminist Theories of Rape: Sex or Violence?’ Rethinking Rape. Ed. Ann J Cahill. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2001. 15–47. Print.Google Scholar
  10. Cahill, Ann J. ‘Recognition, Desire, and Unjust Sex.’ Hypatia 29.2 (2014): 303–319. Print.Google Scholar
  11. Carlson, Clare. ‘“The Bitch Got Drunk and Did This to herself:” Proposed Evidentiary Reforms to Limit “Victim Blaming” and “Perpetrator Pardoning” in Rape by Intoxication Trials in California.’ Wisconsin Journal of Law, Gender and Society 29.2 (2014): 285–315. Web.Google Scholar
  12. Dajee, Rupen. ‘7000 in Solidarity.’ N.p., 2014. Web. 30 Oct. 2014.Google Scholar
  13. De Leon, Jackson. An Act to Add Section 67386 to the Education Code, Relating to Student Safety. California: N.p., 2014. Print.Google Scholar
  14. Dune, Tinashe M, and Russell P Shuttleworth. ‘“It’s Just Supposed to Happen”: The Myth of Sexual Spontaneity and the Sexually Marginalized.’ Sexuality and Disability 27.2 (2009): 97–108. Web.Google Scholar
  15. Fulu, Emma, Alice Kerr-wilson, and James Lang. What Works to Prevent Violence against Women and Girls? Evidence Review of Interventions to Prevent Violence against Women and Girls. London, UK: N.p., 2014. Web. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/337615/evidence-reviewinterventions-F.pdf
  16. Gavey, Nicola. Just Sex?: The Cultural Scaffolding of Rape. East Sussex: Routledge, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
  17. Gotell, Lise. ‘Rethinking Affirmative Consent in Canadian Sexual Assault Law: Neoliberal Sexual Subjects and Risky Women.’ Akron Law Review 41 (2008): 865–898. Print.Google Scholar
  18. Gotell, Lise. ‘The Discursive Disapearance of Sexualized Violence: Feminist Law Reform, Judicaial Resistance and Neo-Liberal Sexual Citizenship.’ Feminism Law and Social Change. Ed. Dorothy E Chunn, Susan B Boyd, and Lessard Hester. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2007. 127–163. Print.Google Scholar
  19. Hollway, Wendy. ‘Women’s Power in Heterosexual Sex.’ Women’s Studies International Forum 7.1 (1984): 63–68. Print.Google Scholar
  20. House of Commons, 34th Parliament. ‘An Act to Amend the Criminal Code (Sexual Assault).’ Bill C-49 1992: n. pag. Print.Google Scholar
  21. Kitzinger, Celia, and Hannah Frith. ‘Just Say No? The Use of Conversation Analysis in Developing a Feminist Perspective on Sexual Refusal.’ Discourse & Society 10.3 (1999): 293–316. Print.Google Scholar
  22. Lam, Nina et al. ‘ConsentEd’. N.p., 2014. Web.Google Scholar
  23. MacKinnon, C. Towards a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989. Print.Google Scholar
  24. O’Byrne, Rachael, Susan Hansen, and Mark Rapley. ‘“If a Girl Doesn”t Say “No”…’: Young Men, Rape and Claims of “Insufficient Knowledge.”’ Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 18.3 (2008): 168–193. Web.Google Scholar
  25. O’Byrne, Rachael, Mark Rapley, and Susan Hansen. ‘“You Couldn’t Say “No”, Could You?’: Young Men’s Understandings of Sexual Refusal.’ Feminism & Psychology 16.2 (2006): 133–154. Web.Google Scholar
  26. Pateman, Carole. ‘Women and Consent.’ Political Theory 8.2 (1980): 149–168. Web.Google Scholar
  27. Patterson, Jennifer. Queering Sexual Violence. Riverdale, NY: Riverdale Ave Books, 2016. Print.Google Scholar
  28. ‘R. vs. Ewanchuk’. 1999.Google Scholar
  29. Ryan, Valerie M. ‘Intoxicating Encounters: Allocating Responsibility in the Law of Rape.’ California Western Law Review 40.2 (2004): 407–429. Print.Google Scholar
  30. Section, Law Enforcement Support. Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Division Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) User Manual. Washington, DC: N.p., 2013. Web.Google Scholar
  31. Sex Crimes. New Zealand: Crimes Act 1961, 1961. Web.Google Scholar
  32. Sexual Assault Voices of Edmonton. ‘No Title.’ N.p., n.d. Web.Google Scholar
  33. Tuerkheimer, Deborah. ‘Affirmative Consent.’ Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 13.2 (2016): 441–468. Print.Google Scholar
  34. Vega, Judith. ‘Coercion and Consent: Classic Liberal Concepts in Texts on Sexual Violence.’ International Journal of the Sociology of Law 16 (1988): 75–89. Print.Google Scholar
  35. Weale, Sally. ‘Oxford Will Also Put on Similar Sessions Designed to Debunk Myths Surrounding Consent at 20 of Its Colleges.’ The Guardian Sept. 2014. Web.Google Scholar
  36. Wenger, Ashley A., and Brian H. Bornstein. ‘The Effects of Victim’s Substance Use and Relationship Closeness on Mock Jurors’ Judgments in an Acquaintance Rape Case.’ Sex Roles 54.7–8 (2006): 547–555. Web.Google Scholar
  37. Where No Consent Is Obtained. Canada: Criminal Code of Canada, 1992. Web.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melanie Ann Beres
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Sociology, Gender and Social WorkThe University of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations