Advertisement

Ambulatory Selective Varices Ablation Under Local Anaesthesia (ASVAL)

  • Paul Pittaluga
  • Sylvain Chastanet
Chapter

Abstract

The notion of traditional surgical treatment for varicose veins combining crossectomy and stripping as the “gold standard” seems to have had its days. Several important steps forwards have revolutionized varicose vein treatment with the emergence of new techniques since the beginning of the twenty-first century that have called the utility of crossectomy into question. Therefore, the way for another physiopathological theory of varicose veins was opened that questions whether the saphenous vein has initial responsibility for the development of the venous disease. Consequently, it has seemed logical to envisage an approach sparing the saphenous vein with a thorough treatment of the venous reservoir by the mean of micro-phlebectomy called the ASVAL method (ambulatory selective varices ablation under local anaesthesia). The results of this saphenous-sparing strategy have been reported as equivalent to the results of techniques that involve an ablation of the saphenous vein, more aggressive for the venous physiology, if the patients are properly selected.

Literature

  1. 1.
    Mayo CH. Treatment of varicose vein. Surg Gyn Obst Br J Surg. 1906;2:385–8.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Babcock WW. A new operation for the extirpation of varicose veins of the leg. N Y Med J. 1907;86:153–6.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Trendelenburg F. Ueber die Unterbindung der Vena Saphena magna bei Unterschenkel Varicen. Beitr Klin Chir. 1890–1891;7:195–210.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ludbrook J, Beale G. Femoral venous valves in relation to varicose veins. Lancet. 1962;1:79–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Franceschi C. Théorie et Pratique de la Cure Conservatrice Hémodynamique de l’Insuffisance Veineuse en Ambulatoire, Percy sous thil, Editions de l’Armaçon, 1988.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Navarro L, Min RJ, Bone C. Endovenous laser: a new minimally invasive method of treatment for varicose veins--preliminary observations using an 810 nm diode laser. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27(2):117–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chandler JG, Pichot O, Sessa C, Schuller-Petrovic S, Kabnick LS, Bergan JJ. Treatment of primary insufficiency by endovenous saphenous vein obliteration. Vasc Surg. 2000;38:201–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cabrera Garrido JR, Cabrera Garcia Olmedo JR, Garcia Olmedo D. Nuevo metodode esclerois en las varices trunculares. Pathol Vasc. 1993;1:55–72.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hamel-Desnos C, Desnos P, Wollman JC, Ouvry P, Mako S, Allaert FA. Evaluation of the efficacy of polidocanol in the form of foam compared with liquid form in sclerotherapy of the greater saphenous vein: initial results. Dermatol Surg. 2003;29:1170–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guex JJ. Foam sclerotherapy: an overview of use for primary venous insufficiency. Semin Vasc Surg. 2005;18:25–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pittaluga P, Réa B, Barbe R, Guex JJ. Méthode ASVAL (Ablation Sélective des Varices sous Anesthésie Locale): principes et résultats préliminaires. Phlebologie. 2005;58:175–81.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Labropoulos N, Leon L, Kwon S, Tassiopoulos A, Gonzalez-Fajardo JA, Kang SS, Mansour MA, Littooy FN. Study of the venous reflux progression. J Vasc Surg. 2005;41(2):291–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cooper DG, Hillman-Cooper CS, Barker SG, Hollingsworth SJ. Primary varicose veins: the sapheno-femoral junction, distribution of varicosities and patterns of incompetence. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003;25(1):53–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Engelhorn CA, Engelhorn AL, Cassou MF, Salles-Cunha SX. Patterns of saphenous reflux in women with primary varicose veins. J Vasc Surg. 2005;41(4):645–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pittaluga P, Chastanet S. Classification of saphenous refluxes: implications for treatment. Phlebology. 2008;23:2–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pittaluga P, Chastanet S, Réa B, Barbe R, Guex JJ. Saphenous vein preservation: is it the new gold standard? Torino: Minerva Med; 2007. p. 391–9.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Labropoulos N, Kokkosis AA, Spentzouris G, Gasparis AP, Tassiopoulos AK. The distribution and significance of varicosities in the saphenous trunks. J Vasc Surg. 2010;51:96–103.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Creton D. Diamater reduction of the proximal long saphenous vein after ablation of a distal incompetent tributary. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25:394–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zamboni P, Cisno C, Marchetti F, Quaglio D, Mazza P, Liboni A. Reflux elimination without any ablation or disconnection of the saphenous vein. A haemodynamic model for venous surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2001;21:361–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pittaluga P, Chastanet S, Locret T, Barbe R. The effect of isolated phlebectomy on reflux and diameter of the great saphenous vein: a prospective study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;40:122–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Biemans A, Van den Bos R, Hollestein LM, et al. The effect of single phlebectomies of a large varicose tributary on great saphenous vein reflux. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2014;2:179–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zolotukhin IA, Seliverstov EI, Zakharova EA, Kirienko AI. Short-term results of isolated phlebectomy with preservation of incompetent great saphenous vein (ASVAL procedure) in primary varicose veins disease. Phlebology. 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0268355516674415.
  23. 23.
    Rose SA, Ahmed A. Some thoughts on the etiology of varicose vein. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1986;27:534–43.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Clarke GH, Vasdekis SN, Hobbs JT, Nicolaides AN. Venous wall function in the pathogenesis of varicose veins. Surgery. 1992;111:402–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Travers JP, Brookes CE, Evans J, Baker DM, Kent C, Makin GS, Mayhew TM. Assessment of wall structure and composition of varicose veins with reference to collagen, elastin and smooth muscle content. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1996;11:230–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Labropoulos N, Giannoukas AD, Delis K, Mansour MA, Kang SS, Nicolaides AN, Lumley J, Baker WH. Where does venous reflux start? J Vasc Surg. 1997;26:736–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pittaluga P, Chastanet S, Réa B, Barbe R. Midterm results of the surgical treatment of varices by phlebectomy with conservation of a refluxing saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg. 2009;50:107–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Abu-Own A, Scurr JH, Coleridge Smith PD. Saphenous vein reflux without incompetence at the saphenofemoral junction. Br J Surg. 1994;81:1452–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pittaluga P, Chastanet S. Predictive value of a pre-operative test for the reversibility of the reflux after phlebectomy with preservation of the great saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2014a;2:105.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pittaluga P, Chastanet S. Varicose vein recurrence after pregnancy: influence of the preservation of the saphenous vein in nullipara patients. Blucher Med Proc. 2014b;1:81–2.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pittaluga P, Chastanet S. Persistent incompetent truncal veins should not be treated immediately. Phlebology. 2015;30:98–106.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pittaluga P, Chastanet S. Lymphatic complications after varicose veins surgery: risk factors and how to avoid them. Phlebology. 2012;27(Suppl 1):139–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Creton D, Rea B, Pittaluga P, Chastanet S, Allaert FA. Evaluation of the pain in varicose vein surgery under tumescent local anaesthesia using sodium bicarbonate as excipient without any intravenous sedation. Phlebology. 2012;27:368–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pittaluga P, Chastanet S. Value of postoperative compression after mini invasive surgical treatment of varicose veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2013;1:385–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pittaluga P, Chastanet S. Treatment of varicose veins by ASVAL: results at 10 years. Ann Vasc Surg. 2017;38:e10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2016.07.021. Epub 2016 Oct 11CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Pittaluga
    • 1
  • Sylvain Chastanet
    • 1
  1. 1.Riviera Veine InstitutMonacoFrance

Personalised recommendations