Advertisement

The Limits of Populism: Mills, Marcuse and 1960s Radicalism and Occupy

  • Mike O’Donnell
Chapter

Abstract

O’Donnell provides a historical comparison of the nature and effectiveness of 1960s radicalism in the United States and recent radical activism in Britain. This chapter begins by discussing the concepts of ‘radicalism’ and ‘populism’. In the next part, it presents an analysis of the work of Mills and Marcuse in relation to the populist aspects of 1960s radical activism. Then, in the light of the above, this chapter examines the Occupy movement, arguing that it shares with 1960s radicalism a broadly populist character, with each movement’s limited impact due partly to an inadequate appreciation of the importance of accessing state power. This chapter concludes with some practical suggestions regarding the tactics and strategy of political protest.

Keywords

Populism 1960s radicalism Mills Marcuse Occupy Britain United States 

Works Cited

  1. Bell, Daniel. 1988[1960]. The end of ideology: On the exhaustion of political ideas in the fifties. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bettleheim, Bruno. 1969. Obsolete youth: Towards a psychograph of adolescent rebellion. Encounter 32 (September): 29–42.Google Scholar
  3. Calhoun, Craig. 2012. The roots of radicalism: Tradition, the public sphere and early nineteenth century social movements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cambridge Dictionary of Sociology (CDS). 2006. Cambridge dictionary of sociology. Ed. Bryan Turner. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Daily Telegraph. 2016. Worrying populism. Daily Telegraph, February 28, 17.Google Scholar
  6. Diani, Mario. 2000. Simmel to Rokkan and beyond: Towards a network theory of new social movements. European Journal of Social Theory 3 (4): 387–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fukuyama, Francis. 1992. The end of history and the last man. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  8. Gerbaudo, Paolo. 2013. When anarchism goes pop. Open Democracy. https://www.opendemocracy.net/paolo-gerbaudo/when-anarchism-goes-pop. Accessed 23 June 2014.
  9. Gitlin, Todd. 2012. Occupy nation: The roots, the spirit, and the promise of Occupy Wall Street. New York: itbooks.Google Scholar
  10. Hofstadter, Richard. 1967. The American political tradition and the men who made it. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  11. Horowitz, Irving. 1967. Power, politics and people: The collected essays of Charles Wright Mills. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Jacobs, Paul, and Saul Landau. 1967. The new radicals. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  13. Jones, Bryn, and Michael O’Donnell. 2010. Radicalism and social movement activism: Retreat and resurgence. London: Anthem.Google Scholar
  14. Kerr, Clark. 2001[1963]. The uses of the university. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1972. Ideology and no end: The controversy till now. Encounter 39 (6): 17–22.Google Scholar
  16. Marcuse, Herbert. 1955. Eros and civilisation. London: Sphere Books.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 1964. One dimensional man. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 1968. An essay on liberation. Boston: Beacon Books.Google Scholar
  19. Miliband, Ralph. 1969. The state in capitalist society. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
  20. Mills, Charles Wright. 1956. The power elite. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 1959a. The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 1959b. The causes of world war three. London: Martin Secker and Warburg.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 1959c. Culture and politics: The fourth epoch. In Power, politics and people: The collected essays of Charles Wright Mills, ed. Irving Horowitz, 236–246. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. ———. 1960a. Letter to the New Left. In Power, politics and people: The collected essays of Charles Wright Mills, ed. Irving Horowitz, 247–259. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. ———. 1960b. Listen Yankee: The revolution in Cuba. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  26. O’Donnell, Michael. 2008. Nineteen sixties radicalism and its critics: Utopian radicals, liberal realists and postmodern sceptics. Psychoanalysis, Culture and Society 13 (3): 240–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oglesby, Carl. 1970. Trapped in a system. In The New Left: A documentary history, ed. Massimo Teodori, 182–188. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  28. Piketty, Thomas. 2014. Capitalism in the twenty-first century. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Roszac, Theodore. 1968. The making of the counter-culture: Reflections on the technocratic society and its youthful opposition. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  30. Seligman, Daniel. 1969. A special kind of rebellion. In Youth in turmoil: Adapted from a special issue of Fortune, ed. Louis Banks. New York: Time Incorporated. https://www.amazon.com/Youth-Turmoil-Adapted-Special-Fortune/dp/B000ND0N60.
  31. Teodori, Massimo. 1970. The New Left: A documentary history. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  32. Touraine, Alain. 2014. After the crisis. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mike O’Donnell
    • 1
  1. 1.University of WestminsterLondonUK

Personalised recommendations