‘Execrations on another plane’: Film Theory in Close Up and Beckett’s Late Prose

  • Galina Kiryushina
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Modern European Literature book series (PMEL)

Abstract

Beckett’s correspondence of the 1930s reveals his awareness of the artistic possibilities offered by film, and a particular interest in the optical manipulation of the image achieved both in the camera and at the editing bench. This interest grew stronger as his critical taste developed by immersive reading in film theory in 1936, the year he wrote an application to study with Sergei Eisenstein in Moscow. His extensive theoretical knowledge came from the pages of the modernist film magazine Close Up (1927–33), where the first English translations of Eisenstein’s essays appeared, and which epitomized a significant cultural meeting point of literature and cinema. Taking Eisenstein’s writing on film published in Close Up and the magazine’s overall cultural project as points of departure, this paper explores the traces of early cinematic forms and editing theories in Beckett’s late text, Ill Seen Ill Said (1981).

References

  1. Alexandrov, Grigori, Sergei Eisenstein, and Vsevolod Pudovkin. 1928. The Sound Film: A Statement from U.S.S.R. Close Up 3 (4): 10–13.Google Scholar
  2. Antoine-Dunne, Jean. 2001. Beckett and Eisenstein on Light and Contrapuntal Montage. Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd’hui 11: 315–323.Google Scholar
  3. Bair, Deirdre. 1978. Samuel Beckett: A Biography. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  4. Bergan, Ronald. 1999. Eisenstein: A Life in Conflict. New York: Overlook Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bignell, Jonathan. 2009. Beckett on Screen. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brater, Enoch. 1975. The Thinking Eye in Beckett’s Film. Modern Language Quarterly 36: 166–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Donald, James, Anne Friedberg, and Laura Marcus, eds. 1998. Close Up 1927–1933: Cinema and Modernism. London: Casell.Google Scholar
  8. Eisenstein, Sergei M. 1930a. Filmic Art and Training (An Interview with Mark Segal). Close Up 6 (3): 195–197.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 1930b. The Cinematographic Principle of Japanese Culture. Trans. Ivor Montagu and S.S. Nalbandov. Transition 19–20: 90–103.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 1931a. The Dinamic Square: Conclusion. Close Up 8 (2): 91–94.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 1931b. The Principles of Film Form. Trans. Ivor Montagu. Close Up 8 (3): 167–181.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 1933a. An American Tragedy. Close Up 10 (2): 109–124.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 1933b. Cinematography with Tears! The Way of Learning. Close Up 9 (1): 3–17.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 1983. Immoral Memories: An Autobiography. Trans. Herbert Marshall. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  15. Flynn, Deirdre. 2016. The Form and Function of Dialectical Cinécriture in Beckett’s Company. Journal of Beckett Studies 25 (2): 188–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ford, Hugh. 1996. Introduction. In Negro: An Anthology, ed. Nancy Cunard. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  17. Forsdick, Charles, and Christian Høgsbjerg. 2014. Sergei Eisenstein and the Haitian Revolution: ‘The Confrontation Between Black and White Explodes Into Red’. History Workshop Journal 78 (1): 157–185.Google Scholar
  18. Friedman, Alan W. 2015. Beckett in Black and Red: Translations for Nancy Cunard’s Negro. Kentucky: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
  19. Kedzierski, Marek. 1995. Beckett and the (Un)changing Image of the Mind. Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd’hui 4: 149–158.Google Scholar
  20. Knowlson, James, and John Haynes. 2003. Images of Beckett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Marcus, Laura. 2008. The Tenth Muse: Writing about Cinema in the Modernist Period. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 2009. Cinema and Visual Culture: Close Up (1927–1933). In The Oxford Critical and Cultural History of Modernist Magazines, Volume I: Britain and Ireland 1880–1955, ed. Peter Brooker and Andrew Thacker, 505–529. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 2017. Samuel Beckett and Cinema. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  24. ———. 1995. On Directing Film. Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd’hui 4: 29–38.Google Scholar
  25. Seton, Marie. 1960. Sergei M. Eisenstein: A Biography. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
  26. Tanaka, Mariko Hori. 2001. Elements of Haiku in Beckett: The Influence of Eisenstein and Arnheim’s Film Theories. Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd’hui 11: 131–142.Google Scholar
  27. Weiss, Katherine. 2012. James Joyce and Sergei Eisenstein: Haunting Samuel Beckett’s Film. Journal of Beckett Studies 21 (2): 181–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Galina Kiryushina
    • 1
  1. 1.Charles UniversityPragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations