Advertisement

Political Entrepreneurship and Policy Change in the End of Life Debate in Israel

  • Michal Neubauer-Shani
  • Omri Shamir
Chapter
Part of the Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy book series (PEPP)

Abstract

The issue of dying with dignity has gained broad public resonance in recent decades due to technological developments that have steadily raised average life expectancy, and the deepening internalization of liberal rights discourse in society. Along with these developments, the involvement of institutional entrepreneurship in policy change has been increasing too. Some countries have already regulated dying with dignity in various ways (for example, Oregon legalized assisted suicide in 1998; the Netherlands legalized active euthanasia in 2001). Nevertheless, until 2000, this issue was not regulated in Israel, leaving it in the hands of the court system. That year, Israeli Health Minister Benizri announced the establishment of a public professional committee to compile a comprehensive bill on the matter, which led to a process of thorough legislation that was concluded at the end of 2005, when the Dying Patient Law underwent a second and third reading in the Israeli Parliament (Knesset).

References

  1. Arian, A., & Keissar-Sugarman, A. (2011). A portrait of Israeli Jews: Beliefs, observance and values of Israeli Jews. Jerusalem: Israel Democracy Institute. (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  2. Bakir, C. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and institutional change: Multilevel governance of central banking reform. Governance, 22(4), 571–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakir, C. (2013). Bank behaviour and resilience: The effects of structures, institutions and agents. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bakir, C., & Jarvis, D. S. L. (Eds.) (2017). Institutional and policy entrepreneurship and policy change in public policy making. In Institutional entrepreneurship and policy change: Theoretical and empirical explorations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Bakir, C., & Jarvis, D. S. L. (forthcoming 2018). Institutional entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy and Society.Google Scholar
  6. Barilan, Y. M. (2003). Dying patient: Halachic background, Steinberg report and bio-ethical discourse in Israel. Medicine, 142, 562–558. (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  7. Barilan, Y. M. (2013). Jewish bioethics: Rabbinic law and theology in their social and historical contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1991). Agenda dynamics and policy subsystems. The Journal of Politics, 53(4), 1044–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Billings, J. A., & Krakauer, E. L. (2011). On patient autonomy and physician responsibility in end-of-life care. Archives of Internal Medicine, 171(9), 849–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell, J. L. (2004). Institutional change and globalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cohen, A., & Susser, B. (2003). From accommodation to escalation. Tel-Aviv: Schocken Press. (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  12. Considine, M. (1998). Making up the government’s mind: Agenda setting in a parliamentary system. Governance, 11(3), 297–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dahl, R. A. (1961). Who governs? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dees, J. G. (1998). The meaning of social entrepreneurship: Comments and suggestions contributed from the Social Entrepreneurship Funders Working Group. Retrieved from http://scholar.google.co.il/scholar?hl=iw&q=social+entrepreneurship&btnG=
  15. Downs, A. (1972). The issue-attention cycle and the political economy of improving our environment. In The political economy of environmental control (pp. 9–34). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  16. Drucker, P. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship. New York, NY: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  17. Edwards, C., Jones, G., Lawton, A., & Llewellyn, N. (2002). Public entrepreneurship: Rhetoric, reality and context. International Journal of Public Administration, 25(12), 1539–1554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gavison, R. (1998). Constitutional revolution: A description of reality or self-fulfilling prophecy. Misphatim, 21, 34–47. (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  19. Gavison, R., Kremnitzer, M., & Dotan, Y. (2000). Judicial activism: For and against: The role of the high court of justice in Israeli society. Jerusalem: Magnes-Hebrew University Press. (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  20. Gostin, L. O. (1995). Informed consent, cultural sensitivity, and respect for persons. JAMA, 274(10), 844–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guttman, E. (1996). The religious divide. In M. Lisak & B. Kani-Paz (Eds.), Israel towards the new millennium: Society, politics and culture. Jerusalem: Magnes, Hebrew University. (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  22. Hart, M. M., Stevenson, H. H., & Dial, J. (1995). Entrepreneurship: A definition revisited. In W. D. Bygrave et al. (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research (pp. 75–89). Wellesley, MA: Babson College.Google Scholar
  23. Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  24. Kretzmer, D. (1996). The new basic laws on human rights: A mini-revolution in Israeli constitutional law? Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 14, 173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Levy, J. S. (2008). Case studies: Types, designs and logics of inference. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 25, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. López, E. J. (2002). The legislator as political entrepreneur: Investment in political capital. The Review of Austrian Economics, 15(2–3), 211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McCaffrey, M., & Salerno, J. T. (2011). A theory of political entrepreneurship. Modern Economy, 2(4), 552–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Meydani, A. (2009). Political transformations and political entrepreneurs: Israel in comparative perspective. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meydani, A. (2011). The Israeli Supreme Court and the human rights revolution: Courts as agenda setters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meydani, A. (2015). Political entrepreneurs and institutional change: Governability, liberal political culture, and the 1992 electoral reform in Israel. In M. Lee, I. N. Aflaki, & P. Petridou (Eds.), Entrepreneurship in the polis: Understanding political entrepreneurship. Abingdon: Ashgate Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Mintrom, M. (2000). Policy entrepreneurs and school choice. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Mintrom, M., & Norman, P. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 37(4), 649–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mucciaroni, G. (1992). The garbage can model & the study of policy making: A critique. Polity, 24(3), 459–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Neubauer-Shani, M. (2007). Agenda-setting in the Israeli context: State and religion issues. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem (In Hebrew).Google Scholar
  35. Petridou, E., Aflaki, I. N., & Miles, L. (2015). Unpacking the theoretical boxes of political entrepreneurship. In M. Lee, I. N. Aflaki, & P. Petridou (Eds.), Entrepreneurship in the polis: Understanding political entrepreneurship. Abingdon: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  36. Rehbock, T. (2011). Limits of autonomy in biomedical ethics? Conceptual clarifications. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 20(4), 524–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Roberts, N., & King, P. (1991). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Sapir, G. (2009). Constitutional revolutions: Israel as a case-study. International Journal of Law in Context, 5(4), 355–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schneider, M., & Teske, P. (1992). Toward a theory of the political entrepreneur: Evidence from local government. American Political Science Review, 86(3), 737–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schneider, M., Teske, P., & Mintrom, M. (1995). Public entrepreneurs: Agents for change in American government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Sheingate, A. D. (2003). Political entrepreneurship, institutional change, and American political development. Studies in American Political Development, 17(2), 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Steinberg, A. (2003). Decision-making process at the end of life. Medicine, 142, 672–673. (In Hebrew).Google Scholar
  43. Steinberg, A., & Sprung, C. L. (2006). The dying patient: New Israeli legislation. Intensive Care Medicine, 32(8), 1234–1237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stone, D. A. (1989). Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas. Political science quarterly, 104(2), 281–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Taylor, H. (2014). Promoting a patient’s right to autonomy: Implications for primary healthcare practitioners. Part 1. Primary Health Care, 24(2), 36–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Toktz’inski, J. (1947). Bridge of life. Jerusalem: Chabad Library. (In Hebrew).Google Scholar
  47. Turner, L. G. (1996). Bioethics in a pluralistic world: Truth telling, informed consent, and euthanasia. Health Care Analysis, 11(2), 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wear, S., & Moreno, J. D. (1994). Informed consent: Patient autonomy and physician beneficence within clinical medicine. HEC Forum, 6(5), 323–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zohlnhofer, R., & Rub, F. (Eds.). (2016). Decision-making under ambiguity and time constraints: Assessing the multiple-streams framework. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michal Neubauer-Shani
    • 1
  • Omri Shamir
    • 1
  1. 1.Ashkelon Academic CollegeAshkelonIsrael

Personalised recommendations