Advertisement

Energy-Efficient Bias-Based User Association for Heterogeneous Networks in LTE-Advanced

  • Ayuba K. DanburamEmail author
  • Mohammed A. Gadam
  • Aliyu D. Usman
  • Suleiman M. Sani
Chapter
Part of the Green Energy and Technology book series (GREEN)

Abstract

Heterogeneous network (HetNet) deployment is a promising technique for improving energy efficiency in 4G and beyond wireless cellular systems. The major challenge of enhancing energy efficiency in HetNet is a poor cell selection when the conventional reference signal received power (RSRP) or biased RSRP (BRSRP) cell selection algorithm is employed. These cell selection techniques limit the potential of HetNet in improving transmission energy efficiency. The proposed energy-efficient bias setting strategy is an adaptive BRSRP cell selection algorithm. It uses energy efficiency as cell load metric for adaptive picocell range extension (CRE). The algorithm efficiently estimates the varying energy efficiency in each cell, then, based on the optimality gap of the energy efficiency, it adopts an optimized bias value per cell. Simulations using LTE system level simulator shows the proposed adaptive bias setting improves energy efficiency, average UE throughput and system capacity by 6.7, 9.7 and 6.9%, respectively when compared with BRSRP with a fixed bias of 6 dB. Although the proposed adaptive bias exhibits low offloading gain from PeNB to MeNB as against BRSRP, the system load balance has improved when compared with RSRP.

Keywords

Heterogeneous network Picocell range expansion Cell selection Energy efficiency Traffic load balance 

References

  1. 1.
    Joud MA (2013) Pico cell range expansion toward LTE-advanced wireless heterogeneous. M.Sc. Thesis, Department of information and communication technologies, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gadam MA, Ng CK, Nordin NK, Sali A, Hashim F (2016) Hybrid channel gain and access cell association for load balancing in downlink LTE-advanced HetNets. In 6th IEEE international conference on computer and communication engineering (IEEE ICCCE 2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Khadka SK, Shrestha J, Shakya SR, Lal L (2015) Energy demand analysis of telecom towers of Nepal with strategic scenario development and potential energy cum cost saving with renewable energy technology options. Int J Res Eng Sci (IJRES) 3:01–08Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Damnjanovic A, Montojo J, Wei Y, Ji T, Luo T, Vajapeyam M, Yoo T, Song O, Malladi D (2011) A survey on 3GPP heterogeneous networks. Wirel Commun, IEEE 18(3):10–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    AcharyaJ, Gao, L, Gaur S (2014) Heterogeneous networks in LTE-advanced. WileyGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Konishi S (2013) Comprehensive analysis of heterogeneous networks with picocells in LTE-advanced systems. IEICE Trans Commun E96-B(6):1243–1255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Humar I, Ge X, Xiang L, Jo M, Chen M, Zhang J (2014) Rethinking energy efficiency models of cellular networks with embodied energy. IEEE Network 25:40–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guo W, Turyagyenda C, Hamdoun H, Wang S, Loskot P, O’Farrell T (2011) Towards a low energy LTE cellular network: architectures. In 2011 19th European Signal Processing Conference, pp. 879–883Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhou T, Huang Y, Huang W, Li S, Sun Y, Yang L (2014) QoS-aware user association for load balancing in heterogeneous cellular networks. In 2014 IEEE 80th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2014-Fall), pp 1–5Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Andrews JG, Singh S, Ye Q, Lin X, Dhillon H (2014) An overview of load balancing in HetNets: old myths and open problems. Wirel Commun, IEEE, 21(2):18–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gadam M, Ahmed MA, Ng CK, Nordin NK, Sali A, Hashim F (2016) Review of adaptive cell selection techniques in LTE-Advanced Heterogeneous Networks. J Comput Netw Commun 2016Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gu W, Li W, Zhang L (2013) Adaptive cell range control in heterogeneous network. In 2013 international conference on wireless communication and signal process, October 2013, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kikuchi K, Otsuka H (2013) Parameter optimization for adaptive control CRE in HetNet, pp 3349–3353Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koizumi T, Higuchi K (2013) A simple decentralized cell association method for heterogeneous networks. IEICE Trans Commun 96(6):1358–1366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gu X, Deng X, Li Q, Zhang L, Li W (2014) Capacity analysis and optimization in heterogeneous network with adaptive cell range control. Int J Antennas PropagGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Davaslioglu K (2015) Energy efficiency and load balancing in next-generation wireless cellular networks. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of California, IrvineGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gadam MA, Ng CN, Nordin NK, Sali A, Hashim F (2016) Hybrid channel gain prioritized access‐aware cell association with interference mitigation in LTE‐Advanced HetNets. Int J Commun SystGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Danburam AK, Usman AD, Sani SM, Gadam MA (2016) Analysis on energy efficient traffic load balancing in downlink LTE-advance heterogeneous network. In International conference on information and communication technology and its applications (ICTA 2016), pp 191–197Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Abdulkafi AA, Tiong SK, Chieng D, Ting A, Ghaleb AM, Koh J (2013) Modeling of energy efficiency in heterogeneous network. Eng Technol 6(17):3193–3201Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Siddique U, Tabassum H, Hossain E, Kim DI (2015) Channel access-aware user association with interference coordination in two-tier downlink cellular networks. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 9545(c):1–1Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gadam MA, Maijama’a L, Usman IH (2013) A review on resource allocation techniques in downlink 29 LTE. J Mobile Commun 17–23Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Khirallah C, Rastovac D, Vukobratovic D, Thompson J (2014) Energy efficient multimedia delivery services over LTE/LTE-A. IEICE Trans Commun 97:1504–1513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Network T (2009) Tr 36.814-further advancements for e-utra: physical layer aspects (release 9). 3rd Generation Partnership Project Tech Rep, Tech RepGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang Y (2010) System level analysis of LTE-advanced: with emphasis on multi-component carrier management. Videnbasen for Aalborg UniversitetVBN, Aalborg UniversitetAalborg University, Det Teknisk-Naturvidenskabelige FakultetThe Faculty of Engineering and Science, Institut for Elektroniske SystemerDepartment of Electronic SystemsGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Access EUTR (2010) Further advancements for E-UTRA physical layer aspects. 3GPP Technical Specification TR, vol 36, p V2Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zineb AB, Ayadi M, Tabbane S (2017) An enhanced vertical handover based on fuzzy inference MADM approach for heterogeneous networks. Arab J Sci Eng 1–12Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Acharya J (2014) Cellular network topology toolbox, pp 1–6Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ayuba K. Danburam
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mohammed A. Gadam
    • 2
  • Aliyu D. Usman
    • 1
  • Suleiman M. Sani
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringAhmadu Bello UniversityZariaNigeria
  2. 2.Department of Electrical and Electronic EngineeringFederal Polytechnic BauchiBauchiNigeria

Personalised recommendations