Advertisement

Rebuilding Practitioner Self-Efficacy Through Learner Feedback

  • Assia Slimani-Rolls
  • Richard Kiely
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter is an account of a business English teacher exploring the challenges of obtaining meaningful learner feedback and course evaluations. Striving to integrate research into teaching, and working with students as co-researchers in line with Exploratory Practice (EP) principles, the teacher gathered feedback and evaluations from tertiary level students. Despite some initial doubts and challenges, the experience established a greater sense of teacher self-efficacy, and resulted in a more effective and better connected classroom. EP processes, both in carrying out the exploration, and disseminating the findings fostered a new researcher facet as part of this teacher’s professional identity.

References

  1. Allwright, D., & Hanks, J. (2009). The developing language learner: An introduction to exploratory practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Banister, C. (2016a, July). Review collage. English Teaching Professional, 105, 38–39.Google Scholar
  3. Banister, C. (2016b, June 24–25). How obtaining meaningful student feedback and evaluations can create a space for optimised learning and teacher-researcher development. Teachers research! Istanbul 2016 IATEFL ReSIG. Bahçeşehir University International Conference. Beşiktaş Campus, İstanbul.Google Scholar
  4. Banister, C. (2016c, November). Obtaining meaningful student feedback and evaluations of the learning experience in a business English context. In D. Maltezos, P. Karatas, & S. Turkel (Eds.), Cultivation of quality culture in ELT in higher education, May 2016, Conference Proceedings, Ege University and the British Council, Ege University Press: Izmir, Turkey, November 2016.Google Scholar
  5. Borg, S. (2010). Language teacher research engagement. Language Teaching, 43(4), 391–429.Google Scholar
  6. Clayson, D. E., & Haley, D. A. (2011). Are students telling us the truth? A critical look at the student evaluation of teaching. Marketing Education Review, 21(2), 101–112.Google Scholar
  7. Dikilitaş, K. (2016). Teacher research as a catalyst for school development. In K. Dikilitaş, M. Wyatt, J. Hanks, & D. Bullock (Eds.), Teachers engaging in research (pp. 31–48). Faversham, Kent: IATEFL.Google Scholar
  8. Hanks, J. (2015). Language teachers making sense of exploratory practice. Language Teaching Research, 19(5), 612–633.Google Scholar
  9. Hanks, J. (2016, February). “Why exploratory practice?” A collaborative report. ELT Research (31), IATEFL Research SIG (resig.iatefl.org). Available at: http://resig.weebly.com/issue-31.html. Accessed May 17, 2016.
  10. Kiely, R. (2009). Small answers to the big question: Learning from language programme evaluations. Language Teaching Research, 13(1), 99–116.Google Scholar
  11. Mortiboys, A. (2010). How to be an effective teacher in higher education: Answers to lecturers’ questions. Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Rowland, L. (2011). Lessons about learning: Comparing learner experiences with language research. Language Teaching Research, 15(2), 245–267.Google Scholar
  13. Slimani-Rolls, A., & Kiely, R. (2014). ‘We are the change that we seek’: Developing teachers’ understanding of their classroom practice. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(4), 425–435.Google Scholar
  14. Williams, R., & Brennan, J. (2004). Collecting and using student feedback: A guide to good practice. Open Research Online [PDF]. Available at: http://oro.open.ac.uk/11875/1/Collecting_and_using_student_feedback_a_guide_to_good_practice.pdf. Accessed February 20, 2016.
  15. Wyatt, M. (2016). Engaging language teachers in research: Achieving psychological and educational benefits. In K. Dikilitaş, M. Wyatt, J. Hanks, & D. Bullock (Eds.), Teachers engaging in research (pp. 3–18). Faversham, Kent: IATEFL.Google Scholar
  16. Wyatt, M., & Dikilitaş, K. (2015). English language teachers becoming more efficacious through research engagement at their Turkish university. Educational Action Research, 24(4), 550–570.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Languages and CultureRegent’s University LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Modern Languages and LinguisticsUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations