Exploratory Practice and Modern Foreign Languages in a Globalised World

  • Assia Slimani-RollsEmail author
  • Richard Kiely


This chapter reviews the particular situation with the development of the teaching of modern foreign languages (MFLs) other than English over recent decades. The chapter describes the impact of reduced investment in the development of MFL pedagogies, in the context of increased focus on English as foreign or second language. It also identifies aspects of diversity in the teaching of these languages, shaped by higher education institutions agendas including globalisation and internationalisation. We see Exploratory Practice (EP) as a means of facing up to some of the challenges, and developing the pedagogic approaches and classroom skills which are capable of transforming the teaching of MFLs posed by the globalised classroom.


  1. Abdul Rehman, A. (2016). The teachers perspectives: What they want and get from supervisory practices. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Graduate School of Education, University of Exeter.Google Scholar
  2. Aguilar, M., & Rodriguez, M. (2012). Lecturer and students perceptions on CLIL at a Spanish University. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(2), 183–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Bakri, S. (2017). Effects of English medium on students’ learning experiences and quality of education in content courses in a public in Oman. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Graduate School of Education, University of Exeter.Google Scholar
  4. Allen, H. W., & Negueruela-Azarola, E. (2010). The professional development of future professors of foreign languages: Looking back, looking forward. Modern Language Journal, 94(iii), 377–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allwright, D. (2015). Putting ‘understanding’ first in practitioner research. In I. N. K. Dikilitas, R. Smith, & W. Trotman (Eds.), Teacher-researchers in action (pp. 19–36). Faversham: IATEFL.Google Scholar
  6. Allwright, D., & Hanks, J. (2009). The developing language learner: An introduction to Exploratory Practice. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benrabah, M. (2013). Language conflict in Algeria from colonialism to post-independence. Bristol, Buffalo, Toronto: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar
  8. Block, D., & Cameron, D. (Eds.). (2002). Globalisation and language teaching. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. British Council. (2013). Language rich Europe. Conclusions and future perspectives. Lifelong Learning Programme. British Council.Google Scholar
  10. Byrnes, H. (2016). Notes from the editor: Celebrating 100 years of the Modern Language Journal. The Modern Language Journal.
  11. Cabau-Lampa, B. (2007). Mother tongue plus two European languages in Sweden: Unrealistic educational goal? Language Policy, 6, 333–358. Scholar
  12. Cable, C., Driscoll, P., Mitchell, R., & Sing, S. (2010). Language learning at key stage2: A longitudinal study. London: Department for Children Schools and Families.Google Scholar
  13. Campbell, C., Cirillo, C., & Critchley, M. (2015–2016, March). UCML-AULC survey of institution-wide language provision in universities in the UK. Accessed 12 November 2017.
  14. Coleman, J. A. (2006). English-medium teaching in European higher education. Language Teaching, 39, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Coleman, J. A., Galaczi, A., & Astruc, L. (2007). Motivation of UK school pupils towards foreign languages: A large-scale survey at key Stage 3. Language Learning Journal, 35, 245–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cortis, G. (1977). The social context of teaching. London: Open Books.Google Scholar
  17. Costa, F., & Coleman, J. A. (2013). A survey of English-medium instruction in Italian higher education. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. DfES (Department for Education and Skills). (2002). Languages for life. A strategy for England. Nottingham, UK: DfES Publications.
  19. Dornyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (Eds.). (2009). Motivation, language identity and the L2 self. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  20. Eurobarometer. (2001). Europeans and languages. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  21. Eurobarometer. (2006). Europeans and languages. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  22. European Commission. (2005). A new framework strategy for multilingualism. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  23. Gallagher-Brett, A. (2007). What do learners’ beliefs about speaking reveal about their awareness of learning strategies? The Language Learning Journal, 35, 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gieve, S., & Cunico, S. (2012). Language and content in the modern foreign languages degree: A students’ perspective. The Language Learning Journal, 40(3), 273–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Graddol, D. (2004). The future of language. Science, 303, 1329–1331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Graddol, D. (2006). English next. London: The British Council.Google Scholar
  27. Hanks, J. (2017). Integrating research and pedagogy: An Exploratory Practice approach. System, 68, 38–49. Scholar
  28. Hyltenstam, K. (2010). Foreign language provision at secondary level in Sweden. Sociolinguistica, 24(1), 85–100. Google Scholar
  29. Lehikoinen, A. (2004). Foreign-language-medium education as national strategy. In R. Wilkinson (Ed.), Integrating content and language: Meeting the challenge of a multilingual higher education (pp. 41–48). Maastricht: University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lo Bianco, J. (1987). National policy on languages. Canberra: Australian Government Publish Service.Google Scholar
  31. Lo Bianco, J., & Slaughter, Y. (2009). Australian education review. Second language Australian schooling. ACER Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  32. Macaro, E. (2003). Second language teachers as second language researchers. Language Learning Journal, 27(1), 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Macaro, E., Graham, S., & Woore, R. (2016). Improving foreign language teaching: Towards a research-based curriculum and pedagogy. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
  34. Marsden, E., & Kasprowicz, R. (2015, January 28). Engagement with research amongst foreign language education practitioners in the UK: Perceptions, problems and priorities. Paper presented at the University of Westminster. Funded by a BAAL ‘Applied Linguistics’ fund. Conducted in collaboration with the Association for Language Learning.Google Scholar
  35. Marsden, E., & Kasprowicz, R. (2017). Foreign language educators’ exposure to research: Reported experiences, exposure via citations, and a proposal for action. The Modern Language Journal, 17, 1–30. Scholar
  36. Mitchell, R. (2011). Still gardening in a gale: Policy, research and practice in foreign language education in England. FLuL 40. Jahrang. 50–67. Heft 1.Google Scholar
  37. Modern Language Association. (2007). Foreign languages and higher education: New structures for a changed world.
  38. Moskowitz, G. (1978). Caring and sharing in the foreign language class: A sourcebook on humanistic techniques. Rowley, MA: Newsbury House.Google Scholar
  39. Pauwels, A. (2011). Future directions for the learning of languages in universities: Challenges and opportunities. Language Learning Journal, 39(2), 247–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pachler, N. (2002). Foreign language learning in England in the 21st century. The Language Learning Journal, 25(1), 4–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Phillipson, R. (2009). English in Globalisation, a lingua franca or a lingua frankesteinia? TESOL Quarterly, 43(2), 335–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rowland, L. (2011). Lessons about learning: Comparing learner experiences with language research. Language Teaching Research, 15(2), 245–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stevick, E. W. (1976). Memory, meaning, and method: Some psychological perspectives on language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury.Google Scholar
  44. Webb, G. (2005). Internationalisation of the curriculum. An institutional approach. In J. Carroll & J. Ryan (Eds.), Teaching international students. Improving learning for all (pp. 110–118). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Wiley, T. (2007). The foreign language ‘crisis’ in the United States: Are heritage and community languages the remedy? Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 4(2/3), 179–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Williams, M., Burden, R., & Lanvers, U. (2002). French is the language of love and stuff; student perceptions of issues related to motivation in learning in a foreign language. British Educational Research Journal, 28, 503–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Worton, D. (2009). Review of modern foreign languages provision in higher education in England. HEFCE. Accessed 10 November 2017.
  48. Zhang, R. (2004). Using the principles of Exploratory Practice to guide group work in an extensive reading class in China. Language Teaching Research, 8(3), 331–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Languages and CultureRegent’s University LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Modern Languages and LinguisticsUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations