Insight into Learner-Generated Materials

  • Assia Slimani-RollsEmail author
  • Richard Kiely


This chapter describes a critical evaluation of learner-generated materials. The goal is to understand better why students respond well to creating their own materials and why they embrace the process of ‘sharing’ their self-generated content with other students and the teacher. The account illustrates how this contributes to enhanced good quality of life in the classroom. The study provides a description of the EP classroom research strategies used, examples of student feedback and evaluation of the local pedagogy, and the ways in which students were included in the research process.


  1. Allwright, D. (2003). A brief guide to exploratory practice: Rethinking practitioners research in language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 7(2), 113–141.Google Scholar
  2. Allwright, D. (2005). Developing principles for practitioner research: The case of exploratory practice. The Modern Language Journal, 89(3), 353–366.Google Scholar
  3. Allwright, D., & Hanks, J. (2009). Exploratory practice: The developing language learner. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Borg, S. (2010). Language teacher research engagement. Language Teaching Research, 43(4), 391–429.Google Scholar
  5. Burns, A. (2011). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Google Scholar
  6. Dawson, S. (2016). Practice to professional development: What practitioners think. IATEFL ELT Research, 31, 10–12.Google Scholar
  7. Hanks, J. (2016). “Why exploratory practice?” A collaborative report. ELT Research 31 Feb 2016 IATEFL Research SIG ( Available at:” Accessed 17 May 2016.
  8. Hulse, T. (2016). The why of the world. Business Life, 2–34. London: Cedar Communications.Google Scholar
  9. Rowland, L. (2011). Lessons about learning: Comparing learner experiences with language research. Language Teaching Research, 15(2), 258.Google Scholar
  10. Slimani-Rolls, A., & Kiely, R. (2014). ‘We are the change that we seek’: Developing teachers’ understanding of their classroom practice. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(4), 425–435.Google Scholar
  11. Sutherland-Smith, W. (2002). Integrating online discussion in an Australian intensive language course. TESOL Journal, 11(3), 31–35.Google Scholar
  12. Wyatt, M., & Dikilitaş, K. (2015). English language teachers becoming more efficacious through research engagement at their Turkish university. Educational Action Research. Accessed 7 July 2016.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Languages and CultureRegent’s University LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Modern Languages and LinguisticsUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations