Advertisement

Exploratory Practice in Language Education: How Teachers Teach and Learn

  • Assia Slimani-Rolls
  • Richard Kiely
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter locates Exploratory Practice (EP) in the fields of language teaching and teacher learning. It considers the traditions of language teaching, from method to post-method, which have come to shape programmes in teacher education and development. Then, it discusses the ways EP, as an approach to practice, and as a form of practitioner research, can develop teachers’ pedagogic strategies through working with students to understand classrooms, and to transform the social space of the classroom.

References

  1. Akbari, R. (2008). Postmethod discourse and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 42(4), 641–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allwright, D. (2003). Exploratory practice: Rethinking practitioner research in language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 7(2), 113–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allwright, D. (2005). From teaching points to learning opportunities and beyond. TESOL Quarterly, 39(1), 9–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allwright, D., & Hanks, J. (2009). The developing language learner: An introduction to exploratory practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anthony, E. M. (1963). Approach, method and technique. English Language Teaching Journal, 17(1), 63–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beretta, A., & Davies, A. (1985). Evaluation of the Bangalore project. ELT Journal, 39(2), 121–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Breen, M., & Candlin, C. N. (1980). The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 89–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burns, A. (2004). Action research: An evolving paradigm. Language Teaching, 38(1), 57–74.Google Scholar
  9. Crabbe, D. (2003). The quality of language learning opportunities. TESOL Quarterly, 37(1), 9–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ellis, R. (2010). Second language acquisition, teacher education and language pedagogy. Language Teaching, 43(2), 182–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ellis, R. (2013). Task-based language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Farrell, T. S. C. (2012). Novice-service language teacher development: Bridging the gap between preservice and in-service education and development. TESOL Quarterly, 46(3), 435–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gieve, S., & Miller, I. K. (Eds.). (2006). Understanding the language classroom. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Hall, G. (2017). Exploring ELT: Language in action (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Hanks, J. (2017). Exploratory practice in language teaching: Puzzling about principles and practices. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harmer, J. (2015). The practice of English language teaching. Harlow: Pearson Educational Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. Hayes, D. (Ed.). (2014). Innovations in the continuing professional development of English language teachers. London: The British Council.Google Scholar
  18. Hiver, P. (2013). The interplay of possible language teacher selves in professional development choices. Language Teaching Research, 17(2), 210–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holliday, A. (1994). Appropriate methodology and social context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hunter, D., & Kiely, R. (2016). The idea as a mechanism in language teacher development. Journal of Second Language Teaching and Research, 5(1), 37–61.Google Scholar
  21. Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1981). The action research planner. Victoria: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kiely, R. (2012). Designing evaluation into change management processes. In C. Tribble (Ed.), Managing change in English language teaching: Lessons from experience (pp. 75–91). British Council.Google Scholar
  23. Kiely, R., & Askham, J. (2012). Furnished imagination: The impact of pre-service teacher training on early career work in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 46(3), 495–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kiely, R., & Davis, M. (2010). From transmission to transformation: Teacher learning in ESOL. Language Teaching Research, 14(3), 277–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kiely, R., & Rea-Dickins, P. (2005). Programme evaluation in language education. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kubanyiova, M. (2012). Teacher development in action: Understanding language teachers’ conceptual change. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kumaravadivelu, B. (1994). The postmethod condition: (E)merging strategies for second/foreign language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). TESOL methods: Changing tracks, challenging trends. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 59–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McNiff, J. (1988). Action research: Principles and practice. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mitchell, R. (2011). Still gardening in a gale: Policy, research and practice in foreign language education in England. Fremdsprachen Lehren und Lernen, 40(1), 49–67.Google Scholar
  31. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (1986). A brief history of language teaching. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching: A Description and Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Scherer, A., & Wertheimer, M. (1964). A Psycholinguistic experiment in foreign language teaching. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  35. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  36. Scrivener, J. (2011). Learning teaching. Oxford: Macmillan Education.Google Scholar
  37. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Slimani-Rolls, A. (2009). Complexity and idiosyncracy of classroom life. In T. Yoshida, H. Imai, Y. Nakata, A. Tajino, O. Takeuti, & K. Tamai (Eds.), Researching language teaching and learning: An integration of practice and theory (pp. 57–75). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  39. Smith, P. D. (1970). A comparison of the cognitive and audio lingual approaches to foreign language instruction: The Pennsylvania foreign language project. Philadelphia, PA: The Centre for Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  40. Walsh, S., & Mann, S. (2015). Doing reflective practice: A data-led way forward. ELT Journal, 69(4), 351–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wedell, M. (2009). Planning educational change: Putting people and their contexts first. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  42. Wedell, M. (2011). More than just ‘technology’: English language teaching initiatives as complex educational changes. In Dreams and realities: Developing countries and the English language (pp. 269–290). London: British Council.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Languages and CultureRegent’s University LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Modern Languages and LinguisticsUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations