Advertisement

Is the Balance of Payments Constrained Growth Rate Time-Varying? Exchange Rate Over Valuation, Policy-Induced Recessions, Deindustrialization, and Long Run Growth

  • Mark Setterfield
  • Selen Ozcelik
Chapter

Abstract

A long-held view among macroeconomists in the UK and USA is that sustained currency over valuation, often the result of financial-sector dominance, weakens domestic macroeconomic performance, and results in premature deindustrialization. Similar concerns have been expressed about persistent, policy-induced recessions. According to balance of payments constrained growth (BPCG) theory, meanwhile, the BPCG rate in a multi-sector economy varies directly with the share of manufacturing in total output. This chapter develops a simple model that combines these observations to show how a temporary but persistent shock to the nominal exchange rate and/or domestic demand can both affect the actual rate of growth in the short run (by moving it away from the long-run equilibrium BPCG rate) and alter the BPCG rate itself (by lowering the income elasticity of demand for exports as a result of induced premature deindustrialization). The result is a time-varying balance of payments constrained growth (TV-BPCG) rate. Because actual growth and the TV-BPCG rate vary directly, the latter is also characterized as quasi path dependent.

References

  1. Araujo, R. A., & Lima, G. T. (2007). A structural economic dynamics approach to balance-of-payments-constrained growth. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 31(5), 755–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumol, W., Blackman, S., & Wolff, E. (1991). Productivity and American leadership: The long view. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Blecker, R. (2003). The benefits of a lower dollar: How the high dollar has hurt U.S. manufacturing producers and why the dollar still needs to fall further (Briefing paper). Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  4. Cantore, N., Clara, M., Lavopa, A., & Soare, C. (2017). Manufacturing as an engine of growth: Which is the best fuel? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 42, 56–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Epstein, G. (2001). Financialization, rentier interests, and central bank policy (Technical report). Amherst: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  6. Epstein, G., & Schor, J. (1990). Macropolicy in the rise and fall of the golden age. In S. A. Marglin & J. B. Schor (Eds.), The golden age of capitalism: Reinterpreting the postwar experience. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  7. Felipe, J., & Mehta, A. (2016). Deindustrialization? A global perspective. Economics Letters, 149, 148–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hersh, A. S. (2003). Is there a future for manufacturing? The visible hand of U.S. deindustrialization. In A. E. Eaton (Ed.), Industrial relations research association: Proceedings of the 55th annual meeting. Champaign: Industrial Relations Research Association.Google Scholar
  9. Kaldor, N. (1960). Causes of growth and stagnation in the world economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. McCombie, J. S. L. (2011). Criticisms and defences of the balance-of-payments constrained growth model: Some old, some new. PSL Quarterly Review, 64(259), 353–392.Google Scholar
  11. McCombie, J. S. L., & Thirlwall, A. P. (1994). Economic growth and the balance-of-payments constraint. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Missio, F., Araujo, R. A., & Jayme, F. G. (2017). Endogenous elasticities and the impact of the real exchange rate on structural economic dynamics. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 42, 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nell, K. (2003). A ‘generalised’ version of the balance-of-payments growth model: An application to neighbouring regions. International Review of Applied Economics, 17(3), 249–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nishi, H. (2016). A multi-sectoral balance-of-payments-constrained growth model with sectoral heterogeneity. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 39, 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Palley, T. (2003). The over-valued dollar and the US slump. In C. F. Bergsten & J. Williamson (Eds.), Dollar overvaluation and the world economy. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  16. Palley, T. (2016). A theory of economic policy lock-in and lock-out via hysteresis: Rethinking economists’ approach to economic policy (Economics discussion papers 2016–50). Kiel, Germany: Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW).Google Scholar
  17. Razmi, A. (2011). Exploring the robustness of the balance of payments-constrained growth idea in a multiple good framework. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 35(3), 545–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rowthorn, B., & Wells, J. (1987). De-industrialization and foreign trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Schoder, C. (2012). Hysteresis in the Kaleckian growth model: A Bayesian analysis for the US manufacturing sector from 1984 to 2007. Metroeconomica, 63(3), 542–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Setterfield, M. (2009). Path dependency, hysteresis and macrodynamics. In P. Arestis & M. Sawyer (Eds.), Path dependency and macroeconomics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. Setterfield, M. (2011). The remarkable durability of Thirlwall’s law. PSL Quarterly Review, 64(259), 393–427.Google Scholar
  22. Singh, A. (1977). UK industry and the world economy: A case of de-industrialisation? Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1(2), 113–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Thirlwall, A. P. (1979). The balance of payments constraint as an explanation of international growth rate differences. Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, 32(128), 45–53.Google Scholar
  24. Thirlwall, A. P. (1983). A plain man’s guide to Kaldor’s growth laws. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 5(3), 345–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Thirlwall, A. P. (2011). Balance of payments constrained growth models: History and overview. PSL Quarterly Review, 64(259), 307–351.Google Scholar
  26. Thirlwall, A. P. (2013). Economic growth in an open developing economy: The role of structure and demand. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Uemura, H., & Tahara, S. (2015, June 10–12). De-industrialization in Japan and international production linkages in East Asia. Technical report, presented at the Colloque International Recherche & Régulation, Paris.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Setterfield
    • 1
  • Selen Ozcelik
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsNew School for Social ResearchNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations