Advertisement

Contact Dermatitis in Skin of Color

  • Zbigniew Ruszczak
  • Shaden Abdelhadi
Chapter

Abstract

Contact dermatitis, also known as contact eczema, is an adverse skin reaction after contact exposure to a foreign agent, caused either by its irritant (irritant contact dermatitis, ICD) or its allergenic property (allergic contact dermatitis, ACD). The clinical appearance of the lesions depends on the skin region involved and the duration of the exposure; it may be papular, urticaria-like, vesicular, or bullous, presented on an erythematous background. In dark pigmented or black skin, erythema is less recognizable, and the lesions are often hypo- or hyperpigmented; after repeated or persisting exposure, eczematization occurs, and chronic pruritus often results in lichenification. In specific areas of the body such as the eyelids, penis, and scrotum, contact dermatitis can be presented as erythematous edema rather than papules or vesicles. Lesions can be provoked or aggravated by exposure to sun or UV light, resulting in a phototoxic or photoallergic reaction. The skin response also depends on the particular properties of the agent, the nature and duration of the contact, and the individual susceptibility of the patient.

References

  1. 1.
    Zaidi Z. Skin of colour: characteristics and diseases. J Pak Med Assoc. 2017;67:292–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berardesca E, Maibach H. Racial differences in skin pathophysiology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996;34:667–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kompaore F, Marty JP, Dupont C. In vivo evaluation of the stratum corneum barrier function in blacks, Caucasians and Asians with two noninvasive methods. Skin Pharmacol. 1993;6:200–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reed JT, Ghadially R, Elias PM. Skin type, but neither race of gender, influence epidermal permeability barrier function. Arch Dermatol. 1995;131:1134–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hicks SP, Swindells KJ, Middelkamp-Hup MA, et al. Confocal histopathology of irritant contact dermatitis in vivo and the impact of skin color (black vs white). J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;48:727–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berardesca E, Maibach HI. Racial differences in sodium-lauryl-sulphate induced cutaneous irritation: black and white. Contact Dermatitis. 1988;18:65–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Berardesca E, Maibach HI. Sodium-lauryl-sulphate-induced cutaneous irritation. Comparison of white and Hispanic subjects. Contact Dermatitis. 1988;19:136–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kligman AM, Epstein W. Updating the maximization test for identifying contact allergens. Contact Dermatitis. 1975;1:231–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dickel H, Taylor JS, Evey P, et al. Comparison of patch test results with a standard series among white and black racial groups. Am J Contact Dermat. 2001;12:77–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Deleo VA, Alexis A, Warshaw EM, et al. The Association of Race/Ethnicity and patch test results: North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 1998-2006. Dermatitis. 2016;27:288–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Berardesca E, Maibach H. Ethnic skin: overview of structure and function. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;48(S1):39–42.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    National Health Services (NHS) Choices. Contact dermatitis. 2014. www.nhs.us/conditions/eczema-(contact-Dermatitis)/pages/introductionn.aspx.
  13. 13.
    Taylor JS, Amado A. Contact dermatitis and related conditions; August 2010 www.clevelandclinicmed.com/medicalpubs/diseasemanagement/dermatology/contact-dermatitis-and-related-conditions.
  14. 14.
    Pratt MD, Belsito DV, DeLeo DA, et al. North American contact dermatitis group patch test results, 2001-2002 study period. Dermatitis. 2004;15:176–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schäfer T, Böhler E, Ruhdorfer S, et al. Epidemiology of contact allergy in adults. Allergy. 2001;56:1192–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kot M, Bogaczewicz J, Kręcisz B, et al. Contact hypersensitivity to European baseline series and corticosteroid series haptens in a population of adult patients with contact eczema. Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2016;24:29–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schnuch A, Uter W, Geier J, et al. Epidemiology of contact allergy: an estimation of morbidity employing the clinical epidemiology and drug-utilization research (CE-DUR) approach. Contact Dermatitis. 2002;47:32–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Spiewak R. Pesticides as a cause of occupational skin diseases in farmers. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2001;8:1–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mark KA, Brancaccio RR, Soter NA, et al. Allergic contact and photoallergic contact dermatitis to plant and pesticide allergens. Arch Dermatol. 1999;135:67–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Trehan A, Singh K, Kanodia S, et al. Contact hypersensitivity and hand eczema–a study with Indian standard series of allergens. MedPulse. 2014;1:304–9.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sharma VK, Bhari N, Wadhwani AR, et al. Photo-patch and patch tests in patients with dermatitis over the photo-exposed areas: a study of 101 cases from a tertiary care centre in India. Australas J Dermatol. 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ajd.12504.
  22. 22.
    Douglas KE, Ofure Agbi J, Akpovienehe O, et al. Occupational hand dermatitis among hair dressers in a semi-urban community in Rivers State, South-South Nigeria. Nigerian Health J. 2013;13:125–30.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Paulsen E, Hyldgaard MG, Andersen KE, et al. Allergenic sesquiterpene lactones from cushion bush (Leucophyta brownii): new and old sensitizers in a shrub-turned-a-pot plant. Contact Dermatitis. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12757.
  24. 24.
    Shahzad M, Alzolibani AA, Al Robaee AA, et al. Patients seen at the Dermatology ambulatory office in a tertiary care center in Qassim region, Saudi Arabia. Int J Health Sci. 2013;7:130–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lachapelle JM. The spectrum of diseases for which patch testing is recommended. In: Lachapelle JM, Maibach HI, editors. Patch testing and prick testing. Berlin: Springer; 2009. p. 7–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tan Q, Yang H, Liu E, et al. Establishing a role for interleukin-17 in atopic dermatitis-related skin inflammation. J Cutan Med Surg. 2017;21(4):308–15.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1203475417697651.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Halder RM, Nootheti PK. Ethnic skin disorders overview. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;48:143–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Turner RN, Low RH. The principles and practice of moxibustion. Wellingborough: Thorsons Publishers; 1992.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Look KM, Look RM. Skin scarping, cupping, and moxibustion that may mimic physical abuse. J Forensic Sci. 1997;42:103–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jurado-Palomo J, Moreno-Ancillo A, Bobolea ID, et al. Epidemiology of contact dermatitis. www.intechopen.com.  https://doi.org/10.5772/26828.
  31. 31.
    Nguyen T, Saleh MA. Exposure of women to trace elements through the skin by direct contact with underwear clothing. J Environ Health Sci. 2016;52:1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2016.1221212 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Berih A, Berhanu A. Allergic dermatitis – black henna (para-phenylenediamine) use among the East African patient population in a general practice setting. Aust Fam Physician. 2014;43:383–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mukkanna KS, Stone NM, Ingram JR. Para-phenylenediamine allergy: current perspectives on diagnosis and management. J Asthma Allergy. 2017;10:9–15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Khumalo NP, Jessop S, Ehrlich R. Prevalence of cutaneous adverse effects of hairdressing: a systematic review. Arch Dermatol. 2006;142:377–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Stallings A, Sood A. Hair-care practices in African American women: potential for allergic contact dermatitis. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2016;35:207–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Plombom GY, Oliveira MS, Tabushi FL, et al. Epidemiological analysis of occupational dermatitis notified in Brazil in the period 2007 to 2012. An Bras Dermatol. 2016;91:732–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Vejanurug P, Tresukosol P, Sajjachareonpong P, et al. Fragrance allergy could be missed without patch testing with 26 individual fragrance allergens. Contact Dermatitis. 2016;74:230–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Goh CL. Patch tests in the tropics. Berlin: Springer; 2014. p. 143–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zbigniew Ruszczak
    • 1
  • Shaden Abdelhadi
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Consultant Dermatology, Pediatric Dermatology and Allergy, Head of Arab Board Dermatology Residency Program, Chair, Division of Dermatology and Allergy Director of Arab Board Dermatology Residency ProgramSheikh Khalifa Medical CityAbu DhabiUAE
  2. 2.Consultant Dermatology and Pediatric Dermatology, Department of Dermatology and AllergySheikh Khalifa Medical CityAbu DhabiUAE
  3. 3.Department of DermatologyUniversity Medical Center Brussels (UZ Brussels), The Free University of Brussels (VUB)BrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations