Advertisement

Introduction to “Hemodynamic Monitoring”

  • Jukka TakalaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Lessons from the ICU book series (LEICU)

Abstract

The primary goal of intensive care medicine is the prevention, reduction, and removal of temporary risk of death in acutely ill patients, including patients exposed to risk of death due to surgery and other therapeutic interventions. Cardiovascular organ dysfunction or failure is, after respiratory failure, the most common organ function problem in intensive care unit (ICU) patients [1]. The central role of hemodynamic monitoring in the ICU armamentarium is therefore self-evident. In this context monitoring implies observing continuously or continually changes in physiologic variables over time to reveal changes in organ function, to prompt therapeutic interventions, and to evaluate response to therapeutic interventions. Monitoring per se cannot be expected to improve patient outcomes – only timely applied right interventions can do so [2].

References

  1. 1.
    Moreno R, Vincent JL, Matos R, Mendonça A, Cantraine F, Thijs L, et al. The use of maximum SOFA score to quantify organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care. Results of a prospective, multicentre study. Intensive Care Med. 1999;25:686–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Takala J. The pulmonary artery catheter: the tool versus treatments based on the tool. Crit Care. 2006;10:162.  https://doi.org/10.1186/cc5021.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vignon P, Merz TM, Vieillard-Baron A. Ten reasons for performing hemodynamic monitoring using transesophageal echocardiography. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43:1048–51.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-4716-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Weil MH, Shubin H, Rosoff L. Fluid repletion in circulatory shock: central venous pressure and other practical guides. JAMA. 1965;192:668–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rathore MM, Ahmad A, Paul A, Wan J, Zhang D. Real-time medical emergency response system: exploiting IoT and big data for public health. J Med Syst. 2016;40:283.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-016-0647-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lima A, Bakker J. Clinical assessment of peripheral circulation. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2015;21(3):226–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kang MA, Churpek MM, Zadravecz FJ, Adhikari R, Twu NM, Edelson DP. Real-time risk prediction on the wards: a feasibility study. Crit Care Med. 2016;44:1468–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    The PRISM Investigators. Early, goal-directed therapy for septic shock — a patient-level meta-analysis. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2223–34.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1701380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Intensive Care Medicine 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Intensive Care MedicineInselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of BernBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations