Quality Cancer Care
The cancer care system suffers from unevenly distributed resources, variability in practice, workforce constraints, and misaligned financial incentives. A quality cancer care system is equitable, patient-centered, safe, effective, and timely. Attaining this vision of quality care depends on a collaborative commitment to equity, transparency, and information sharing for ongoing quality improvement. This chapter focuses primarily on quality cancer care in the USA with implications for global expansion and attention to the navigator role in quality cancer care.
KeywordsQuality Cancer care Standards Equity
Special thanks to Donna Vigue and Sara Rosenbaum for providing feedback on an earlier draft.
- 1.Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration. Global, regional and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life years for 32 cancer groups, 1990 to 2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. JAMA Oncol. 2016;3(4):524–48. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Pratt-Chapman M. Approaches to cancer survivorship in unique populations: solutions and creative problem-solving. In: Cancer survivorship: transdisciplinary, patient-centered approaches to the seasons of survival. Pittsburg, PA: Oncology Nursing Society; in press.Google Scholar
- 3.National Cancer Policy Board. In: Hewitt M, Simone JV, editors. Ensuring quality cancer care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999. p. 79.Google Scholar
- 4.Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001.Google Scholar
- 5.Committee on Improving the Quality of Cancer Care, Institute of Medicine. In: Levit LA, Nass SJ, Ganz PA, editors. Delivering high-quality cancer care: charting a new course for a system in crisis. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2013.Google Scholar
- 6.Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, Rosenberg WMC, Haynes RB. Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM. 2nd ed. Edinburgh, Scotland: Churchill Livingstone; 2000.Google Scholar
- 7.Levine D, Greenberg R. More minorities needed in clinical trials to make research relevant to all. AAMC News. 2016. https://news.aamc.org/diversity/article/more-minorities-needed-clinical-trials-research.
- 8.Califf RM. 2016: The year of diversity in clinical trials. U.S. Food & Drug Administration. 2016. https://blogs.fda.gov/fdavoice/index.php/2016/01/2016-the-year-of-diversity-in-clinical-trials.
- 11.Institute of Medicine. The health of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people: building a foundation for better understanding. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011.Google Scholar
- 12.Director’s message: sexual and gender minorities formally designated as a health disparity population for research purposes. National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities. 2016. https://www.nimhd.nih.gov/about/directors-corner/message.html.
- 15.Ganz PA, Cheng HY, Gralow JR, Distelhorst SR, Albain KS, Anderson B, Bevilacqua JL, de Azambuja E, El Saghir NS, Kaur R, McTiernan A, Partridge AH, Rowland JH, Singh-Carlson S, Vargo MM, Thompson B, Anderson BO. Supportive care after curative treatment for breast cancer (survivorship care): resource allocations in low- and middle-income countries. A breast health global initiative 2013 consensus statement. Breast. 2013;22:606–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.American College of Physicians. American College of Physicians endorses shared decision making approach for prostate cancer screening. 2013. www.informedmedicaldecisions.org/2013/04/09/american-college-of-physicians-endorses-shared-decision making-approach-for-prostate-cancer-screening.
- 18.American Medical Association. Getting the most for our health care dollars: shared decision making. 2010. www.allhealth.org/briefingmaterials/AMASharedDecisionMaking-1936.pdf.
- 19.Interprofessional Education Collaborative. Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice. 2011. www.aamc.org/download/186750/data/core_competencies.pdf.
- 22.Pratt-Chapman M. TEAM study. Unpublished focus group. August 23, 2017.Google Scholar
- 24.Safavi K, Ratli R, Webb K, MacCracken L. Patients want a heavy dose of digital [presentation]. 2016. www.accenture.com/_acnmedia/PDF-8/Accenture-Patients-Want-A-Heavy-Dose-of-Digital-Infographic-v2.pdf
- 25.Sturmberg JP, Martin CM. The complex nature of knowledge. In: Sturmberg JP, Martin C, editors. Handbook of systems and complexity in health. New York, NY: Springer; 2014. p. 39–62.Google Scholar
- 27.Bao H, Yang F, Su S, Wang X, Zhang M, Xiao Y, Jiang H, Wang J, Liu M. Evaluating the effect of clinical care pathways on quality of cancer care: analysis of breast, colon and rectal cancer pathways. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016;142:1079–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-015-2106-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Van Dam PA, Verheyden G, Sugihara A, Trinh XB, Van Der Mussele H, Wyuts H, Verkinderen L, Hauspy J, Vermeulen P, Dirix L. A dynamic clinical pathway for the treatment of patients with early breast cancer is a tool for better care: implementation and prospective analysis between 2002–2010. World J Surg Oncol. 2013;11:70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 32.Roundtable on the Promotion of Health Equity and the Elements of health Disparities; Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice; Institute of Medicine; National Academies of Sciences: Engineering and Medicine. Achieving health equity via the affordable care act: promises, provisions, and making reform a reality for diverse patients [workshop summary]. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2015.Google Scholar
- 34.National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, 567 US 519. 2012; 183 L. Ed.Google Scholar
- 35.Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, 42 U.S.C. § 18001. 2010.Google Scholar
- 36.National Cancer Policy Forum. In: Balogh RE, Patlak M, Nass S, editors. Cancer care in low-resource areas: cancer treatment, palliative care and survivorship care [workshop summary]. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2017. p. 36.Google Scholar
- 37.University of New Mexico School of Medicine. (n.d). Project ECHO: a revolution in medical education and care delivery. https://echo.unm.edu.
- 42.Lopez A. The economic case for single payer health care in the US. Institute for Economic Thinking. 2017. www.ineteconomics.org/perspectives/blog/the-economic-case-for-single-payer-health-care-in-the-us.
- 43.Antonisse L, Garfield R, Rudowitz R, Artiga S. The effects of Medicaid expansion under the ACA: updated findings from a literature review. Kaiser Family Foundation. 2017. www.kff.org/report-section/the-effects-of-medicaid-expansion-under-the-aca-updated-findings-from-a-literature-review-table-2.
- 44.Ilbawi AM, Ayoo E, Bhadelia A, Chidebe RC, Fadelu T, Herrera C, Htun HW, Jadoon NA, James OW, May L, Maza M, Murgor M, Nency YM, Oraegbunam C, Pratt-Chapman M, Qin X, Rodin D, Tripathi N, Wainer Z, Yap M. Advancing access and equity: the vision of a new generation in cancer control. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(2):172–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30041-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 45.Committee on Improving the Quality of Cancer Care, Institute of Medicine. In: Levit LA, Nass SJ, Ganz, PA, editors. Delivering high-quality cancer care: charting a new course for a system in crisis. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2013. p. 5.Google Scholar
- 46.Committee on Improving the Quality of Cancer Care, Institute of Medicine. In: Levit LA, Nass SJ, Ganz, PA, editors. Delivering high-quality cancer care: charting a new course for a system in crisis. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2013. p. 4.Google Scholar
- 47.Committee on Improving the Quality of Cancer Care, Institute of Medicine. In: Levit LA, Nass SJ, Ganz, PA, editors. Delivering high-quality cancer care: charting a new course for a system in crisis. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2013. p. 7.Google Scholar
- 48.National Comprehensive Cancer Network. (n.d.) NCCN guidelines. www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp.
- 49.American Society of Clinical Oncology. (n.d.). Guidelines, tools, & resources. www.asco.org/practice-guidelines/quality-guidelines/guidelines.
- 50.American Cancer Society. (n.d.) American Cancer Society prevention and early detection guidelines. www.cancer.org/healthy/find-cancer-early/cancer-screening-guidelines/american-cancer-society-guidelines-for-the-early-detection-of-cancer.html.
- 51.American Cancer Society. (n.d.) American Cancer Society survivorship care guidelines. www.cancer.org/health-care-professionals/american-cancer-society-survivorship-guidelines.html.