Advertisement

Movements and Mechanics of Mandible Occlusion Concepts and Laws of Articulation

  • Yasemin K. OzkanEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Mandibular movement occurs as a complex series of interrelated three-dimensional rotational and translational activities. Jaw movements or mandibular kinematics has important applications in many fields of clinical dentistry and provides a basis for modern concepts of dental occlusion. In all branches of dentistry, occlusion is defined as the most important as well as the most confusing concept. Any contact between the occlusal surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular teeth is defined as occlusion. To understand the concept of occlusion, it is necessary to have knowledge about a broad range of subjects, including the contact relation between teeth; mechanics, mathematics, and geometry of jaw movements; the biological response of natural teeth under different conditions; and functional analysis. In this chapter, the related definitions, mandibular border movements, types of occlusion, occlusion in complete dentures, rules and laws of articulation, and incisal and condylar path inclinations are elucidated.

Further Reading

  1. 1.
    Bosman F, Erkelens CJ. Computer simulation of mandibular movements. J Biomech. 1985;18:528–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen DC, Lai YL, Chi LY, Lee SY. Contributing factors of mandibular deformation during mouth opening. J Dent. 2000;28:583–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clough HE, Knodle JM, Leeper SH, Pudwill ML, Taylor DT. A comparison of lingualized occlusion and monoplane occlusion in complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;50:176–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gordon SR, Stoffer WM, Connor SA. Location of the terminal hinge axis and its effect on the second molar cusp positioning. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;52:99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Keshvad A, Winstanley RB. Comparison of the replicability or routinely used centric relation registration techniques. J Prosthodont. 2003;12:90–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kinderknecht KE, Wong GK, Billy EJ, Li SH. The effect of a deprogrammer on the position of the terminal transverse horizontal axis of the mandible. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:123–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koolstra JH, van Eijden TMGJ. The jaw open-close movements predicted by biomechanical modelling. J Biomech. 1997;30:943–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    BR L. Complete denture occlusion. Dent Clin N Am. 2004;3:641–65.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nimmo A, Kratochvil FJ. Balancing ramps in nonanatomic complete denture occlusion. J Prosthet Dent. 1985;53(3):431–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Parr GR, Loft GH. The occlusal spectrum and complete dentures. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1982;3:241–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Peck CC, Langenbach GEJ, Hannam AG. Dynamic simulation of muscle and articular properties during human wide jaw opening. Arch Oral Biol. 2000;45:963–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rangarajan V, Gajapathi B, Yogesh PB, Ibrahim MM, Kumar RG, Karthik M. Concepts of occlusion in prosthodontics: a literature review, part I. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2015;15:200–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rangarajan V, Yogesh PB, Gajapathi B, Ibrahim MM, Kumar RG, Karthik M. Concepts of occlusion in prosthodontics: a literature review, Part II. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2016;16:8–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Taylor TD, Wiens J, Carr A. Evidence-based considerations for removable and dental implant occlusion: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;94:555–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zarb GA, Bolender CL, Hickey JC, Carlsson GE. Boucher’s prosthodontics treatment for edentulous patients. 10th ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1990. p. 330–51.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Dentistry, Department of ProsthodonticsMarmara UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations