Advertisement

Anatomical Landmarks and Impression Taking in Complete Dentures

  • Yasemin K. ÖzkanEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Impression is one of the most important stages of complete denture fabrication. Mistakes that are made at this stage may bring on some problems during the use of dentures. Therefore, the dentist should pay sufficient attention to the anatomical structures surrounding the denture bearing area when making the impression. The basic principles of the impression are the protection of the alveolar ridge, support, retention, stability, and esthetic. In addition to the basic principles of an impression, this chapter provides information about impression methods such as the modified mucostatic (semi-functional) impression method, the mucodynamic impression method, the impression of fibrous (labile) ridges using the selective pressure impression technique, and the neutral zone technique.

Further Reading

  1. 1.
    Al-Ahmad A, Masri R, Driscoll CF, vonFraunhofer J, Romberg E. Pressure generated on a simulated mandibular oral analog by impression materials in custom trays of different design. J Prosthodont. 2006;15:95–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Albers HF. Impressions. A textbook for technique and material selection. 2nd ed. Santa Rosa, CA: Alto Books; 1990.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anusavice KJ, Shen C, Rawls HR. Phillips’ science of dental materials. 12th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2012.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Basso MFM, Nogueira SS, Ario-Filho JN. Comparison of the occlusal vertical dimension after processing complete dentures made with lingualized balanced occlusion and conventional balanced occlusion. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;96:200–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beresin VE, Schiesser FJ. The neutral zone in complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;95:93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boucher CO, Hickey JC, Zarb GA. Prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients. 9th ed. St Louis: Mosby; 1990.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chaffee NR, Cooper LF, Felton DA. A technique for border molding edentulous impressions using vinyl polysiloxane material. J Prosthodont. 1999;8:29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Duncan JP, Raghavendra S, Taylor TD. A selective-pressure impression technique for the edentulous maxilla. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92:299–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ferracane JL. Materials in dentistry principles and applications. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hadjieva H, Dimova M. Selective pressure impressions methods for total dentures by patients with loose and hypermobile mucosa on the alveolar ridges. In: J IMAB annual proceeding (scientific papers) Book2, 2005.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hadjieva H, Dimova M. Total rehabilitation by edentolous patients with irregularity of the alveolar ridges. In: IMAB annual proceeding (scientific papers), Book 2, vol. 11, 2005. p. 51–3.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Halperin AR, Graser GN, Rogoff GS, Plekavich EJ. Mastering the art of complete dentures. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Company, Inc.; 1988.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harwood CL. The evidence base for current practices in prosthodontics. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2008;16:24–34.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hayakawa I, Watanabe I. Impressions for complete dentures using new silicone impression materials. Quint Int. 2003;34:177–80.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Heath R. A study of the morphology of the denture space. Dent Pract Dent Rec. 1970;21:109–17.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hickey JC, Zarb GA. Boucher’s prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients. 8th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Company; 1980.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Huggett R, Brooks SC, Bates JF. The effect of different curing cycles on levels of residual monomer in acrylic resin denture base materials. Quintessence Dent Technol. 1984;8:365–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hyde TP, Craddock H, Brunton P. The effect of seating velocity on pressure within impressions. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;100:384–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hyde TP, Craddocka HL, Blance A, Brunton PA. A cross-over randomised controlled trial of selective pressure impressions for lower complete dentures. J Dent. 2010;38:853–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hyde TP, McCord JF. Survey of prosthodontic impression procedures for complete dentures in general dental practice in the UK. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;83:295–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hyde TP. Case report: differential pressure impressions for complete dentures. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2004;1:5–8.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jacobson TE, Krol AJ. A contemporary review of the factors involved in complete dentures. Part III: support. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;49:306–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jacobson TE, Krol AJ. A contemporary review of the factors involved in complete dentures. Part II: stability. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;49:165–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jeannin C, Perrier P, Payan Y, Dittmar A, Grosgogeat B. Tongue pressure recordings during speech using complete denture. Mater Sci Eng. 2008;28:835–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Klein IE, Broner AS. Complete denture secondary impressions technique to minimize distortion of ridge and border tissues. J Prosthet Dent. 1985;54:660–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lynch CD, Allen PF. Management of the flabby ridge: using contemporary materials to solve an old problem. Br Dent J. 2006;200:258–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Makzoume JE. Morphologic comparison of two neutral zone impression techniques: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92:563–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Malachias A, Paranhos H, Sılva C, Muglia V, Moreto C. Modified functional impression technique for complete dentures. Braz Dent J. 2005;16:135–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Martin JW, Jacob RF, King GE. Boxing the altered cast impression for the dentate obturator by using plaster and pumice. J Prosthet Dent. 1988;59:382–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Masri R, Driscoll CF, Burkhardt J, VonFraunhofer A, Romberg E. Pressure generated on a simulated oral analog by impression materials in custom trays of different designs. J Prosthodont. 2002;11:155–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Petropoulos VC, Rashedi B. Current concepts and techniques in complete denture final impression procedures. J Prosthodont. 2003;12:280–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Philips RW. Skinner’s science of dentaş materials. 8th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1982. p. 177–215, 547–561Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Polyzois GL. Complete dentures for patient with mandibular atrophy. Quint Int. 1985;3:201–5.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Prombonas A, Vissidis D. Analysis of stresses in complete denture upper dentures with flat teeth at differing inclinations. Med Eng Phys. 2009;31:314–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rehmann P, Balkenhol M, Ferger P, Wöstmann B. Influence of the occlusion concept of complete denture on patient satisfaction in the initial phase after fitting: Bilateral balanced occlusion vs Canine guidance. Int J Prosthodont. 2008;21:60–1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sanders I, Mu L. A 3-dimensional atlas of human tongue muscles. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2013;296:1102–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shay K. The retention of complete dentures. In: Zarb GA, Bolender CL, Carlsson GE, editors. Boucher’s prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients’. 11th ed. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book, Inc.; 1997.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tan HK, Hooper PM, Baergen CG. Variability in the shape of maxillary vestibular impressions recorded with modeling plastic and a polyether impression material. Int J Prosthodont. 1996;9:282–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tyson KW. Physical factors in retention of complete upper dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1967;18:90–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Watson IB, MacDonald DG. Oral mucosa and complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1982;47:133–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wee AG, Cwynar RB, Cheng AC. Utilization of the neutral zone technique for a maxillofacial patient. J Prosthodont. 2000;9:2–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zarb GA, Bolender CL, Eckert SE, Fenton AH, Jacob RF, Mericske-Stein R. Prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients: complete dentures and implant supported prostheses. 12th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2003.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Dentistry, Department of ProsthodonticsMarmara UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations