Imaging Findings in Gastrointestinal Cancer: The Esophagus and Stomach

  • Spyros D. Yarmenitis


Before the introduction of endoscopy and the advent of computed tomography, conventional-barium meal-radiographic imaging of the upper gastrointestinal tract was the examination of choice for the detection of esophageal and gastric cancers. Nowadays computed tomography (CT), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), and positron emission tomography (PET) are the imaging modalities implicated in the management of upper gastrointestinal tract cancer. Their role comprises staging of the disease that incorporates assessment of local disease (T stage), of lymph node involvement (N stage), and of distal metastases (M stage), evaluation of treatment response, and detection of possible tumor recurrence.


  1. 1.
    Reed CE, Eloubeidi MA (2002) New techniques for staging for esophageal cancer. Surg Clin North Am 82:697–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rice TW (2000) Clinical staging of esophageal carcinoma. CT, EUS, and PET. Chest Surg Clin N Am 10:471–485PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Picus D, Balfe DM, Koehler RE et al (1983) Computed tomography in the staging of esophageal carcinoma. Radiology 146:433–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Takashima S, Takeuchi N, Shiozaki H et al (1991) Carcinoma of the esophagus: CT vs MR imaging in determining resectability. AJR Am J Roentgenol 156:297–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berger AC, Scott WJ (2004) Noninvasive staging of esophageal carcinoma. J Surg Res 117:127–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Flamen P, Lerut A, Van Cutsem E (2000) Utility of positron emission tomography for the staging of patients with potentially operable esophageal carcinoma. Clin Oncol 18:3202–3210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tio TL, Cohen P, Coene PP et al (1989) Endosonography and computed tomography of esophageal carcinoma: preoperative classification compared to the new (1987) TNM system. Gastroenterology 96:1478–1486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Souquet JC, Napoleon B, Pujol B et al (1994) Endoscopic ultrasonography in the preoperative staging of esophageal cancer. Endoscopy 26:764–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Parmar KS, Zwischenberger JB, Reeves AL, Waxman I (2002) Clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound- guided fine needle aspiration of celiac axis lymph nodes (M1a disease) in esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 73:916–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dorfman RE, Alpern MB, Gross BH, Sandler MA (1991) Upper abdominal lymph nodes: criteria for normal size determined with CT. Radiology 180:319–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fultz PJ, Feins RH, Strang JG et al (2002) Detection and diagnosis of nonpalpable supraclavicular lymph nodes in lung cancer at CT and US. Radiology 222:245–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    van Westreenen HL, Westerterp M, Bossuyt PM et al (2004) Systematic review of the staging performance of 18F fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:3805–3812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kato H, Kuwano H, Nakajima M et al (2002) Comparison between positron emission tomography and computed tomography in the use of the assessment of esophageal carcinoma. Cancer 94:921–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lerut T, Flamen P, Ectors N et al (2000) Histopathologic validation of lymph node staging with FDG-PET scan in cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: a prospective study based on primary surgery with extensive lymphadenectomy. Ann Surg 232:743–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kuszyk BS, Bluemke DA, Urban BA et al (1996) Portal-phase contrast-enhanced helical CT for the detection of malignant hepatic tumors: sensitivity based on comparison with intraoperative and pathologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:91–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schwartz LH, Gandras EJ, Colangelo SM, Ercolani MC, Panicek DM (1999) Prevalence and importance of small hepatic lesions found at CT in patients with cancer. Radiology 210:71–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Westerterp M, van Westreenen HL, Reitsma JB et al (2005) Esophageal cancer: CT, endoscopic US, and FDG PET for assessment of response to neoadjuvant therapy—systematic review. Radiology 236:841–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Weber WA, Ott K, Becker K et al (2001) Prediction of response to preoperative chemotherapy in adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction by metabolic imaging. J Clin Oncol 19:3058–3065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kim YN, Choi D, Kim SH et al (2009) Gastric cancer staging at isotropic MDCT including coronal and sagittal MPR images: endoscopically diagnosed early vs. advanced gastric cancer. Abdom Imaging 34:26–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yang DM, Kim HC, Jin W et al (2007) 64 multidetector-row computed tomography for preoperative evaluation of gastric cancer: histological correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31:98–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee IJ, Lee JM, Kim SH et al (2010) Diagnostic performance of 64-channel multidetector CT in the evaluation of gastric cancer: differentiation of mucosal cancer (T1a) from submucosal involvement (T1b and T2). Radiology 255:805–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kim AY, Kim HJ, Ha HK (2005) Gastric cancer by multidetector row CT: preoperative staging. Abdom Imaging 30:465–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ba-Ssalamah A, Prokop M, Uffmann M et al (2003) Dedicated multidetector CT of the stomach: spectrum of diseases. Radiographics 23:625–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Husband JE, Reznek R (2004) Imaging in oncology. In: Mclean A (ed) Gastric cancer. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 189–215Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kwee RM, Kwee TC (2009) Imaging in assessing lymph node status in gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 12:6–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kim SJ, Kim HH, Kim YH et al (2009) Peritoneal metastasis: detection with 16- or 64-detector row CT in patients undergoing surgery for gastric cancer. Radiology 253:407–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jacquet P, Jelinek JS, Steves MA, Sugarbaker PH (1993) Evaluation of computed tomography in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Cancer 72:1631–1636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chang DK, Kim JW, Kim BK et al (2005) Clinical significance of CT-defined minimal ascites in patients with gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 11:6587–6592CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Spyros D. Yarmenitis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Diagnostic radiologyHygeia HospitalMaroussiGreece

Personalised recommendations