Abstract
Cross-sectional imaging has revolutionized staging and treatment planning of head and neck malignancies. Both CT and MRI are able to depict pathology and provide valuable information allowing for tissue characterization and better discrimination among various pathologic entities, thus facilitating differential diagnosis. Exquisite anatomic details provided by cross-sectional imaging facilitate assessment of disease extension and staging, resulting in better patient management. In particular, MRI is considered the modality of choice for the evaluation of nasopharyngeal, sinonasal, and parotid tumors, while tumors of the oropharynx, larynx, and hypopharynx are initially assessed with CT. The initial step when evaluating a neck lesion is to determine the space where the lesion originates, since specific lesions are being found within each separate anatomic space. This is markedly limiting the differential diagnosis. Additionally, lymph node status is an important prognostic factor, and in cross-sectional imaging, its evaluation mainly relies on size criteria, while the presence of central necrosis is also an important feature. In case of laryngeal carcinoma, the role of cross-sectional imaging is to evaluate tumor extent, while it contributes to treatment planning and patient follow-up. Finally, in many head and neck regions, such as sinuses, nasopharynx, skull base, oral cavity, and hypopharynx-larynx, CT and MR imaging have complementary roles.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Rumboldt Z, Gordon L, Gordon L et al (2006) Imaging in head and neck cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol 7:23–34
Alberico RA, Husain SH, Sirotkin I (2004) Imaging in head and neck oncology. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 13:13–35
Harnsberger HR et al (2004) Diagnostic imaging: head and neck. Amirsys, Salt Lake City
Razek AA, Huang BY (2011) Soft tissue tumors of the head and neck: imaging-based review of the WHO classification. Radiographics 31:1923–1954
Yousem DM, Tufano RP (2002) Laryngeal imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 10:451–465
Som PM, Curtin HD (2011) Head and neck imaging. Mosby Elsevier, St. Louis
Anzai Y, Brunberg JA, Lufkin RB (1997) Imaging of nodal metastases in the head and neck. J Magn Reson Imaging 7:774–783
Steinkamp HJ, Cornehl M, Hosten N et al (1995) Cervical lymphadenopathy: ratio of long- to short-axis diameter as a predictor of malignancy. Br J Radiol 68:266–270
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Primetis, E.C., Dalakidis, A.V. (2018). CT and MR Findings in Head and Neck Cancer. In: Gouliamos, A., Andreou, J., Kosmidis, P. (eds) Imaging in Clinical Oncology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68873-2_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68873-2_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68872-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68873-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)