Advertisement

Online Reviews or Marketer Information? An Eye-Tracking Study on Social Commerce Consumers

  • Patrick MikalefEmail author
  • Kshitij Sharma
  • Ilias O. Pappas
  • Michail N. Giannakos
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10595)

Abstract

Driven by the increasing popularity of social commerce sites, this study seeks to examine the information sources and formats that influence consumer intentions to purchase. Specifically, we build on uses and gratifications theory and dual-process theory to determine how user-generated content and marketer-generated content are consumed by users when making a purchase decision. Using an eye-tracking approach on a popular social commerce site with a sample of 23 consumers, we find significant differences in the types of information used for product purchase compared to those omitted. Our study demonstrates that the format and source of information that consumers utilize, as well as the gaze transitions they make between different types of content when browsing, follow different patterns depending on if a product is bought or rejected. We conclude the paper summarizing the findings and drawing theoretical and practical implications that arise.

Keywords

Social commerce Eye-tracking Dual-process theory User-generated content 

References

  1. 1.
    Mikalef, P., Giannakos, M., Pateli, A.: Shopping and word-of-mouth intentions on social media. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 8, 17–34 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhou, L., Zhang, P., Zimmermann, H.-D.: Social commerce research: an integrated view. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 12, 61–68 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stephen, A.T., Toubia, O.: Deriving value from social commerce networks. J. Mark. Res. 47, 215–228 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cheung, M.Y., Luo, C., Sia, C.L., Chen, H.: Credibility of electronic word-of-mouth: Informational and normative determinants of on-line consumer recommendations. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 13, 9–38 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cheong, H.J., Morrison, M.A.: Consumers’ reliance on product information and recommendations found in UGC. J. Interact. Adv. 8, 38–49 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mikalef, P., Giannakos, M.N., Pateli, A.G.: Exploring the business potential of social media: an utilitarian and hedonic motivation approach. In: Bled eConference, p. 21. (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yadav, M.S., De Valck, K., Hennig-Thurau, T., Hoffman, D.L., Spann, M.: Social commerce: a contingency framework for assessing marketing potential. J. Interactive Mark. 27, 311–323 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bruhn, M., Schoenmueller, V., Schäfer, D.B.: Are social media replacing traditional media in terms of brand equity creation? Manage. Res. Rev. 35, 770–790 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Luo, X., Zhang, J., Duan, W.: Social media and firm equity value. Inf. Syst. Res. 24, 146–163 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Trusov, M., Bucklin, R.E., Pauwels, K.: Effects of word-of-mouth versus traditional marketing: findings from an internet social networking site. J. Mark. 73, 90–102 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ko, H., Cho, C.-H., Roberts, M.S.: Internet uses and gratifications: a structural equation model of interactive advertising. J. Advertising 34, 57–70 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Limayem, M., Cheung, C.M.: Predicting the continued use of Internet-based learning technologies: the role of habit. Behav. Inf. Technol. 30, 91–99 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tsai, W.-H.S., Men, L.R.: Consumer engagement with brands on social network sites: a cross-cultural comparison of China and the USA. J. Mark. Commun. 23, 2–21 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cheung, C.M., Thadani, D.R.: The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: a literature analysis and integrative model. Decis. Support Syst. 54, 461–470 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Filieri, R.: What makes online reviews helpful? a diagnosticity-adoption framework to explain informational and normative influences in e-WOM. J. Bus. Res. 68, 1261–1270 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hovland, C.I., Janis, I.L., Kelley, H.H.: Communication and persuasion; psychological studies of opinion change (1953)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chang, T.-Z., Wildt, A.R.: Price, product information, and purchase intention: an empirical study. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 22, 16–27 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wells, J.D., Valacich, J.S., Hess, T.J.: What signal are you sending? How website quality influences perceptions of product quality and purchase intentions. MIS Q. 35, 373–396 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kim, J., Fiore, A.M., Lee, H.-H.: Influences of online store perception, shopping enjoyment, and shopping involvement on consumer patronage behavior towards an online retailer. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 14, 95–107 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pan, Y., Zhang, J.Q.: Born unequal: a study of the helpfulness of user-generated product reviews. J. Retail. 87, 598–612 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Flanagin, A.J., Metzger, M.J., Pure, R., Markov, A., Hartsell, E.: Mitigating risk in ecommerce transactions: perceptions of information credibility and the role of user-generated ratings in product quality and purchase intention. Electron. Commer. Res. 14, 1–23 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chiu, C.M., Wang, E.T., Fang, Y.H., Huang, H.Y.: Understanding customers’ repeat purchase intentions in B2C e-commerce: the roles of utilitarian value, hedonic value and perceived risk. Inf. Syst. J. 24, 85–114 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chen, J., Teng, L., Yu, Y., Yu, X.: The effect of online information sources on purchase intentions between consumers with high and low susceptibility to informational influence. J. Bus. Res. 69, 467–475 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Flores, W., Chen, J.-C.V., Ross, W.H.: The effect of variations in banner ad, type of product, website context, and language of advertising on Internet users’ attitudes. Comput. Hum. Behav. 31, 37–47 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yoo, J., Kim, M.: The effects of online product presentation on consumer responses: a mental imagery perspective. J. Bus. Res. 67, 2464–2472 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chevalier, J.A., Mayzlin, D.: The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Mark. Res. 43, 345–354 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dhar, V., Chang, E.A.: Does chatter matter? The impact of user-generated content on music sales. J. Interact. Mark. 23, 300–307 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Forman, C., Ghose, A., Wiesenfeld, B.: Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: the role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets. Inf. Syst. Res. 19, 291–313 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lee, J., Park, D.-H., Han, I.: The effect of negative online consumer reviews on product attitude: an information processing view. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 7, 341–352 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Flanagin, A.J., Metzger, M.J.: Trusting expert-versus user-generated ratings online: the role of information volume, valence, and consumer characteristics. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29, 1626–1634 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mikalef, P., Pappas, I.O., Giannakos, M.N.: Value co-creation and purchase intention in social commerce: the enabling role of word-of-mouth and trust. In: Americas Conference on Information Systems AMCIS (2017)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pappas, I.O, Mikalef, P., Giannakos, M,N., Pavlou., P.A.: Value co-creation and trust in social commerce: an fsQCA approach. In: European Conference on Information Systems ECIS (2017)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mikalef, P., Pappas, Ilias O., Giannakos, M.: Consumer intentions on social media: a fsQCA analysis of motivations. In: Dwivedi, Y.K., et al. (eds.) I3E 2016. LNCS, vol. 9844, pp. 371–386. Springer, Cham (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-45234-0_34 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrick Mikalef
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kshitij Sharma
    • 2
  • Ilias O. Pappas
    • 1
  • Michail N. Giannakos
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
  2. 2.CHILI LabEPFLLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations