Advertisement

Diagnosis of Sexual Dysfunctions in Psychiatric Population: Lights and Shadows of DSM-5 Taxonomy of Sexual Disorders

  • Alberto Siracusano
  • Emanuela Bianciardi
Chapter
Part of the Trends in Andrology and Sexual Medicine book series (TASM)

Abstract

Along with the progression and the changes of culture and society, the taxonomy of sexual disorders seems to be in continuous evolution. The recent release of DMS-5 operated many advances with the aim to correct and clarify previous debates in the field of sexual disorders. A minimum duration time and frequency of disorders, particular gender differences, distinctions between paraphilias and mental disorders, and elimination of labeling terms such as gender identity disorder were only some of the innovations that were made. Nonetheless, the revised classification has yielded many controversies that mainly arose from the paucity of empirical supporting data. In particular, it was pointed out that the DSM-5 was not conceived to identify prevalence rates, standardize diagnostic features, bring in appropriate treatments, which were the original objectives of the first release of DSM. The aim of this chapter was to summarize and critically revise major changes and debates among this new edition of DSM.

References

  1. 1.
    American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR. Washington: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. Washington: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Campbell MM, Artz L, Stein DJ. Sexual disorders in DSM-5 and ICD-11: a conceptual framework. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2015;28(6):435–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    World Health Organisation. Defining sexual health. Report of a technical consultation on sexual health. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2002. p. 2006.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Masters WH, Johnson VE. Human sexual response. New York: Bantam; 1966.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kaplan HS. The new sex therapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel; 1974.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    DeFeo J. Understanding sexual, paraphilic, and gender dysphoria disorders in DSM-5. J Child Sex Abus. 2015;24:210–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McCabe MP, Sharlip ID, Atalla E, Balon R, Fisher AD, Laumann E, et al. Definitions of sexual dysfunctions in women and men: a consensus statement from the fourth international consultation on sexual medicine 2015. J Sex Med. 2016;13(2):135–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Navarro-Cremades F, Simonelli C, Montejo AL. Sexual disorders beyond DSM-5: the unfinished affaire. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2017;30(6):417–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sungur MZ, Gündüz A. A comparison of DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 definitions for sexual dysfunctions: critiques and challenges. J Sex Med. 2014;11(2):364–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Derogatis LR, Sand M, Balon R, Rosen R, Parish SJ. Toward a more evidence-based nosology and nomenclature for female sexual dysfunctions – part I. Sex Med. 2016;13(12):1881–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Parish SJ, Goldstein AT, Goldstein SW, Goldstein I, Pfaus J, Clayton AH, et al. Toward a more evidence-based nosology and nomenclature for female sexual dysfunctions – part II. J Sex Med. 2016;13(12):1888–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brauer M, Lakeman M, van Lunsen R, Laan E. Predictors of task-persistent and fear-avoiding behaviors in women with sexual pain disorders. J Sex Med. 2014;11(12):3051–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Both S, Brauer M, Weijenborg P, Laan E. Effects of aversive classical conditioning on sexual response in women with dyspareunia and sexually functional controls. J Sex Med. 2017;14:687–701.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Derogatis LR, Laan E, Brauer M, Van Lunsen RHW, Jannini EA, Davis SR, et al. Responses to the proposed DSM-V changes. J Sex Med. 2010;7(6):1998–2014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    O’Loughlin JI, Basson R, Brotto LA. Women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder versus sexual interest/arousal disorder: an empirical test of raising the bar. J Sex Res. 2017:1–13.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sarin S, Amsel R, Binik YM. A streetcar named “Derousal”? A psychophysiological examination of the desire-arousal distinction in sexually functional and dysfunctional women. J Sex Res. 2016;53(6):711–29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    McMahon CG, Althof SE, Waldinger MD, Porst H, Dean J, Sharlip ID, et al. An evidence-based definition of lifelong premature ejaculation: report of the International Society for Sexual Medicine (ISSM) ad hoc committee for the definition of premature ejaculation. J Sex Med. 2008;5(7):1590–606.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Borg C, de Jong PJ, Elgersma H. Sexual aversion and the DSM-5: an excluded disorder with unabated relevance as a trans-diagnostic symptom. Arch Sex Behav. 2014;43(7):1219–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Beek TF, Cohen-Kettenis PT, Kreukels BP. Gender incongruence/gender dysphoria and its classification history. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2016;28(1):5–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zucker KJ. Epidemiology of gender dysphoria and transgender identity. Sex Health. 2017;14(5):404–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Davy Z. The DSM-5 and the politics of diagnosing transpeople. Arch Sex Behav. 2015;44(5):1165–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zucker KJ. DSM-5: call for commentaries on gender dysphoria, sexual dysfunctions, and paraphilic disorders. Arch Sex Behav. 2013;42:669–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lawrence AA. Gender assignment dysphoria in the DSM-5. Arch Sex Behav. 2014;43(7):1263–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ault A, Brzuzy S. Removing gender identity disorder from the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: a call for action. Soc Work. 2009;54:187–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Winter S, Diamond M, Green J, Karasic D, Reed T, Whittle S, Wylie K. Transgender people: health at the margins of society. Lancet. 2016;388(10042):390–400.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mueller SC, De Cuypere G, T’Sjoen G. Transgender research in the 21st century: a selective critical review from a neurocognitive perspective. Am J Psychiatry. 2017;174(12):1155–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Drescher J. Controversies in gender diagnoses. LGBT Health. 2014;1:10–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Drescher J, Cohen-Kettenis PT, Reed GM. Gender incongruence of childhood in the ICD-11: controversies, proposal, and rationale. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3:297–304.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Steensma TD, Biemond R, de Boer F, Cohen-Kettenis PT. Desisting and persisting gender dysphoria after childhood: a qualitative follow-up study. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2011;16(4):499–516.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kraus C. Classifying intersex in DSM-5: critical reflections on gender Dysphoria. Arch Sex Behav. 2015;44(5):1147–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Downing L. Heteronormativity and repronormativity in sexological “perversion theory” and the DSM-5’s “paraphilic disorder” diagnoses. Arch Sex Behav. 2015;44:1139–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Potter NN. Philosophical issues in the paraphilias. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2013;26:586–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Seto MC, Fedoroff JP, Bradford JM, Knack N, Rodrigues NC, Curry S, et al. Reliability and validity of the DSM-IV-TR and proposed DSM-5 criteria for pedophilia: implications for the ICD-11 and the next DSM. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2016;49(Pt A):98–106.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Moser C. DSM-5 and the paraphilic disorders: conceptual issues. Arch Sex Behav. 2016;45(8):2181–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Beech AR, Miner MH, Thornton D. Paraphilias in the DSM-5. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2016;12:383–406.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ross CA. Commentary: problems with the sexual disorders sections of DSM-5. J Child Sex Abus. 2015;24:195–201.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Blanchard R. A dissenting opinion on DSM-5 pedophilic disorder. Arch Sex Behav. 2013;42:675–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    De Block A, Adriaens PR. Pathologizing sexual deviance: a history. J Sex Res. 2013;50(3–4):276–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    First MB, Frances A. Issues for DSM-V: unintended consequences of small changes: the case of paraphilias. Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165:1240–1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ryan EP, Otonichar JM. Juvenile sex offenders. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2016;18(7):67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Chan HC, Beauregard E, Myers WC. Single-victim and serial sexual homicide offenders: differences in crime, paraphilias and personality traits. Crim Behav Ment Health. 2015;25(1):66–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Turner D, Petermann J, Harrison K, Krueger R, Briken P. Pharmacological treatment of patients with paraphilic disorders and risk of sexual offending: an international perspective. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2017;23:1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Joyal CC. Linking crime to paraphilia: be careful with label. Arch Sex Behav. 2017;46(4):865–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wright S. Kinky parents and child custody: the effect of the DSM-5 differentiation between the paraphilias and paraphilic disorders. Arch Sex Behav. 2014;43:1257–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Federoff JP, Di Giacchino L, Murphy L. Problems with the paraphilias in DSM-5. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2013;15:363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Good P, Burstein J. Hebephilia and the construction of a fictitious diagnosis. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2012;200:492–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Stephens S, Seto MC, Goodwill AM, Cantor JM. Evidence of construct validity in the assessment of hebephilia. Arch Sex Behav. 2017;46(1):301–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Knight RA. Is a diagnostic category for paraphilic coercive disorder defensible? Arch Sex Behav. 2010;39:419–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Briken P, Bourget D, Dufour M. Sexual sadism in sexual offenders and sexually motivated homicide. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2014;37(2):215–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Mokros A, Schilling F, Weiss K, Nitschke J, Eher R. Sadism in sexual offenders: evidence for dimensionality. Psychol Assess. 2014;26(1):138–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Montgomery-Graham S. Conceptualization and assessment of hypersexual disorder: a systematic review of the literature. Sex Med Rev. 2017;5(2):146–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kingston DA, Graham FJ, Knight RA. Relations between self-reported adverse events in childhood and hypersexuality in adult male sexual offenders. Arch Sex Behav. 2017;46(3):707–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychiatry, Department of Systems MedicineUniversity of Rome Tor VergataRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations