Patient-Reported Outcomes in Sexual Medicine
This chapter reviews the most relevant male and female sexuality patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and discusses the process of psychometric validation. The constructs of reliability, various forms of validity, sensitivity, and specificity as well as concerns with translating a PRO into a different language are discussed.
Two tables, one for male PROs and one for female PROs, delineate both multidimensional assessment measures and questionnaires for evaluation of specific sexual dysfunctions. Additionally, both tables include quality of life measures and sexuality measures that can be employed with specific populations.
PROs are valuable tools in the assessment of sexual function in both research and clinical settings. They serve as a useful adjunct to identify and detect treatment benefits and quality of life concerns in individuals with sexual problems.
- 8.Althof S. Patient reported outcomes in the assessment of premature ejaculation. Transl Androl Urol. 2016;5(4):470–4.Google Scholar
- 9.Gravetter F, Forzano L. Research methods for the behavioral sciences. 4th ed. Belmont: Wadsworth; 2012.Google Scholar
- 10.Holden R. Face validity. In: Weiner I, Craighead E, editors. The corsini encyclopedia of psychology. 4th ed. New Jersey: Wiley; 2010. p. 637–8.Google Scholar
- 12.Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, Verjee-Lorenz A, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8(2):94–104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Althof S, Rosen R, Symonds T, Mundayat R, May K, Abraham L. Development and validation of a new questionnaire to assess sexual satisfaction, control, and distress associated with premature ejaculation. J Sex Med. 2006;3(3):465–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00239.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.DiBenedetti DB, Gondek K, Sagnier PP, Kubin M, Marquis P, Keininger D, et al. The treatment satisfaction scale: a multidimensional instrument for the assessment of treatment satisfaction for erectile dysfunction patients and their partners. Eur Urol. 2005;48(3):503–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2005.05.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Clayton AH, Segraves RT, Leiblum S, Basson R, Pyke R, Cotton D, et al. Reliability and validity of the Sexual Interest and Desire Inventory-Female (SIDI-F), a scale designed to measure severity of female hypoactive sexual desire disorder. J Sex Marital Ther. 2006;32(2):115–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00926230500442300.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar