Advertisement

Paraphilia and Paraphilic Disorders

  • Giorgio Di Lorenzo
  • Fiorela Gorea
  • Lucia Longo
  • Michele Ribolsi
Chapter
Part of the Trends in Andrology and Sexual Medicine book series (TASM)

Abstract

Paraphilias are conditions characterized by atypical sexual interests, with hundreds of forms arising from any type of human experience, affecting individuals of all kinds of orientations and even different gender identities. Current psychiatric diagnostic classifications do not consider the presence of paraphilia as a pathological condition unless these atypical sexual thinking, desires, and conducts generate subjective distress, compromise individual’s sexual functioning, and increase the risk of the personal damage or the risk of damage to others. Against this background, this chapter presents the current clinical description and psychiatric diagnostic approach to paraphilic disorders, their epidemiology, and etiopathophysiological factors as well as treatment strategies of one of the most misunderstood groups of psychiatric disorders.

References

  1. 1.
    Von Krafft-Ebing R. Psychopathia sexualis. Stuttgart: Verlag Von Ferdinand Enke; 1886.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Freud S. Three essays on the theory of sexuality. In: Strachey J, editor. The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud. London: Hogarth; 1960.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kinsey A, Pomeroy W, Martin C, Gebhard P. Sexual behavior in the human female. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1953.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aggrawal A. Forensic and medico-legal aspects of sexual crimes and unusual sexual practices. Boca Raton: CRC; 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Limoncin E, Solano C. Parafilie e disturbi parafilici – Introduzione alle parafilie. In: Jannini EA, Lenzi A, Maggi M, editors. Sessuologia medica. Trattato di psicosessuologia, medicina della sessualità e salute della coppia. Milan: Edra; 2017.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    American Psychiatric Association. Paraphilic disorders. In: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2013. p. 685–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beech AR, Miner MH, Thornton D. Paraphilias in the DSM-5. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2016;12(1):383–406.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093330.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    World Health Organization. International statistical classification of diseases – for mortality and morbidity statistics (ICD-11-MMS). Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO); 2018. http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/revision/en/. Accessed 10 Jan 2018.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    World Health Organization. The ICD-10 chapter V: classification of mental and behavioural disorders. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, 10th revision (ICD-10). Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO); 1992.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    World Health Organization. F65 Disorders of sexual preference. In: ICD-10 Version 2016. http://apps.who.int/classifications/icd10/browse/2016/en-/F65. Accessed 10 Jan 2018.
  12. 12.
    World Health Organization. Paraphilic disorders. In: ICD-11 Beta draft (mortality and morbidity statistics). https://icd.who.int/dev11/l-m/en-/http%3a%2f%2fid.who.int%2ficd%2fentity%2f2110604642. Accessed 10 Jan 2018.
  13. 13.
    Limoncin E, Carta R, Gravina GL, Carosa E, Ciocca G, Di Sante S, et al. The sexual attraction toward disabilities: a preliminary internet-based study. Int J Impot Res. 2014;26(2):51–4.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2013.34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Limoncin E, Galli D, Ciocca G, Gravina GL, Carosa E, Mollaioli D, et al. The psychosexual profile of sexual assistants: an internet-based explorative study. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e98413.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098413.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Konrad N, Welke J, Opitz-Welke A. Paraphilias. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2015;28(6):440–4.  https://doi.org/10.1097/yco.0000000000000202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gross M. Paraphilia or perversion? Curr Biol. 2014;24(17):R777–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thibaut F, Bradford JMW, Briken P, De La Barra F, Häßler F, Cosyns P, et al. The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for the treatment of adolescent sexual offenders with paraphilic disorders. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2016;17(1):2–38.  https://doi.org/10.3109/15622975.2015.1085598.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Clark SK, Jeglic EL, Calkins C, Tatar JR. More than a nuisance: the prevalence and consequences of frotteurism and exhibitionism. Sex Abus. 2016;28(1):3–19.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063214525643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Abel GG, Becker JV, Cunningham-Rathner J. Complications, consent, and cognitions in sex between children and adults. Int J Law Psychiatry. 1984;7(1):89–103.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stoller RJ. Perversion: the erotic form of hatred. New York: Pantheon; 1975.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Abel GG, Osborn CA, Twigg DA. Sexual assault through the life span: adult offenders with juvenile histories. In: Barbaree HE, Marshall WL, Hudson SM, editors. The juvenile sex offender. New York: Guilford; 1993. p. 104–17.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Finkelhor D. Child abuse: new theory and research. New York: Free Press; 1984.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hall GCN, Hirschman R. Sexual aggression against children: a conceptual perspective of etiology. Crim Justice Behav. 1992;19(1):8–23.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854892019001003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Marshall WL, Barbaree HE. An integrated theory of the etiology of sexual offending. In: Marshall WL, Laws DR, Barbaree HE, editors. Handbook of sexual assault: issues, theories and treatment of the offender. New York: Plenum; 1990. p. 257–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ward T, Siegert RJ. Toward a comprehensive theory of child sexual abuse: a theory knitting perspective. Psychol Crime Law. 2002;8(4):319–51.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160208401823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ward T, Beech A. An integrated theory of sexual offending. Aggress Violent Behav. 2006;11(1):44–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2005.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Thakker J, Ward T. An integrated theory of sexual reoffending. Psychiatry Psychol Law. 2012;19(2):236–48.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2011.561765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Navathe S, Ward T, Gannon T. Cognitive distortions in child sex offenders: an overview of theory, research & practice. J Forensic Nurs. 2008;4(3):111–22.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-3938.2008.00019.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mustaine EE, Tewksbury R, Corzine J, Huff-Corzine L. Differentiating single and multiple victim child sexual abuse cases: a research note considering social disorganization theory. J Child Sex Abus. 2014;23(1):38–54.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2014.863260.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Blanchard R, Kolla NJ, Cantor JM, Klassen PE, Dickey R, Kuban ME, et al. IQ, handedness, and pedophilia in adult male patients stratified by referral source. Sex Abus. 2007;19(3):285–309.  https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320701900307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tenbergen G, Wittfoth M, Frieling H, Ponseti J, Walter M, Walter H, et al. The neurobiology and psychology of pedophilia: recent advances and challenges. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015;9:344.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00344.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jakubczyk A, Krasowska A, Bugaj M, Kopera M, Klimkiewicz A, Łoczewska A, et al. Paraphilic sexual offenders do not differ from control subjects with respect to dopamine- and serotonin-related genetic polymorphisms. J Sex Med. 2017;14(1):125–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.11.309 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jordan K, Fromberger P, Stolpmann G, Muller JL. The role of testosterone in sexuality and paraphilia – a neurobiological approach. Part I: testosterone and sexuality. J Sex Med. 2011;8(11):2993–3007.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02394.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Jordan K, Fromberger P, Stolpmann G, Muller JL. The role of testosterone in sexuality and paraphilia – a neurobiological approach. Part II: testosterone and paraphilia. J Sex Med. 2011;8(11):3008–29.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02393.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cantor JM, Blanchard R, Robichaud LK, Christensen BK. Quantitative reanalysis of aggregate data on IQ in sexual offenders. Psychol Bull. 2005;131(4):555–68.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.4.555.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Joyal CC, Black DN, Dassylva B. The neuropsychology and neurology of sexual deviance: a review and pilot study. Sex Abus. 2007;19(2):155–73.  https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320701900206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Joyal CC, Beaulieu-Plante J, de Chanterac A. The neuropsychology of sex offenders: a meta-analysis. Sex Abus. 2014;26(2):149–77.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063213482842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Suchy Y, Eastvold AD, Strassberg DS, Franchow EI. Understanding processing speed weaknesses among pedophilic child molesters: response style vs. neuropathology. J Abnorm Psychol. 2014;123(1):273–85.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035812.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Massau C, Tenbergen G, Kargel C, Weiss S, Gerwinn H, Pohl A, et al. Executive functioning in pedophilia and child sexual offending. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2017;23(6):460–70.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355617717000315.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Polisois-Keating A, Joyal CC. Functional neuroimaging of sexual arousal: a preliminary meta-analysis comparing pedophilic to non-pedophilic men. Arch Sex Behav. 2013;42(7):1111–3.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0198-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Schiffer B, Amelung T, Pohl A, Kaergel C, Tenbergen G, Gerwinn H, et al. Gray matter anomalies in pedophiles with and without a history of child sexual offending. Transl Psychiatry. 2017;7(5):e1129.  https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2017.96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sartorius A, Ruf M, Kief C, Demirakca T, Bailer J, Ende G, et al. Abnormal amygdala activation profile in pedophilia. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2008;258(5):271–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-008-0782-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mohnke S, Muller S, Amelung T, Kruger TH, Ponseti J, Schiffer B, et al. Brain alterations in paedophilia: a critical review. Prog Neurobiol. 2014;122:1–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2014.07.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Harenski CL, Thornton DM, Harenski KA, Decety J, Kiehl KA. Increased frontotemporal activation during pain observation in sexual sadism: preliminary findings. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012;69(3):283–92.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.1566.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Habermeyer B, Esposito F, Handel N, Lemoine P, Kuhl HC, Klarhofer M, et al. Response inhibition in pedophilia: an FMRI pilot study. Neuropsychobiology. 2013;68(4):228–37.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000355295.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Poeppl TB, Eickhoff SB, Fox PT, Laird AR, Rupprecht R, Langguth B, et al. Connectivity and functional profiling of abnormal brain structures in pedophilia. Hum Brain Mapp. 2015;36(6):2374–86.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22777.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Massau C, Kargel C, Weiss S, Walter M, Ponseti J, Hc Krueger T, et al. Neural correlates of moral judgment in pedophilia. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017;12(9):1490–9.  https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx077.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kärgel C, Massau C, Weiß S, Walter M, Borchardt V, Krueger TH, et al. Evidence for superior neurobiological and behavioral inhibitory control abilities in non-offending as compared to offending pedophiles. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017;38(2):1092–104.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23443.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Seto MC. Pedophilia and sexual offending against children: theory, assessment, and intervention. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Marshall WA, Tanner JM. Variations in pattern of pubertal changes in girls. Arch Dis Child. 1969;44(235):291–303.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Mokros A, Gebhard M, Heinz V, Marschall RW, Nitschke J, Glasgow DV, et al. Computerized assessment of pedophilic sexual interest through self-report and viewing time: reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the affinity program. Sex Abus. 2013;25(3):230–58.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063212454550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Fromberger P, Jordan K, Steinkrauss H, von Herder J, Witzel J, Stolpmann G, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of eye movements in assessing pedophilia. J Sex Med. 2012;9(7):1868–82.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02754.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Jahnke S, Philipp K, Hoyer J. Stigmatizing attitudes towards people with pedophilia and their malleability among psychotherapists in training. Child Abuse Negl. 2015;40:93–102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.07.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Thibaut F. Pharmacological treatment of paraphilias. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2012;49(4):297–305.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Bijlsma EY, Chan JS, Olivier B, Veening JG, Millan MJ, Waldinger MD, et al. Sexual side effects of serotonergic antidepressants: mediated by inhibition of serotonin on central dopamine release? Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2014;121:88–101.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2013.10.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Garcia FD, Thibaut F. Current concepts in the pharmacotherapy of paraphilias. Drugs. 2011;71(6):771–90.  https://doi.org/10.2165/11585490-000000000-00000.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Khan O, Ferriter M, Huband N, Powney MJ, Dennis JA, Duggan C. Pharmacological interventions for those who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2:Cd007989.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007989.pub2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Långström N, Enebrink P, Laurén EM, Lindblom J, Werkö S, Hanson RK. Preventing sexual abusers of children from reoffending: systematic review of medical and psychological interventions. BMJ. 2013;347:f4630.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f4630.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Schmucker M, Lösel F. The effects of sexual offender treatment on recidivism: an international meta-analysis of sound quality evaluations. J Exp Criminol. 2015;11(4):597–630.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-015-9241-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Craissati J. Managing high risk sex offenders in the community: a psychological approach. New York: Routledge; 2004.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Koo KC, Shim GS, Park HH, Rha KH, Choi YD, Chung BH, et al. Treatment outcomes of chemical castration on Korean sex offenders. J Forensic Legal Med. 2013;20(6):563–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2013.06.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Park WS, Kim KM, Jung YW, Lim MH. A case of mental retardation with paraphilia treated with depot leuprorelin. J Korean Med Sci. 2014;29(9):1320–4.  https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2014.29.9.1320.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giorgio Di Lorenzo
    • 1
    • 2
  • Fiorela Gorea
    • 2
    • 3
  • Lucia Longo
    • 1
    • 2
  • Michele Ribolsi
    • 2
  1. 1.Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology Unit, Department of NeurosciencesFondazione Policlinico Tor VergataRomeItaly
  2. 2.Psychiatry, Department of Systems MedicineUniversity of Rome Tor VergataRomeItaly
  3. 3.University of “Our Lady of Good Counsel”TiranaAlbania

Personalised recommendations