Neo-Tribes pp 235-251 | Cite as

The (Neo)Tribal Nature of Grindr

  • Simon Clay
Chapter

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to explore how users of the popular geo-spatial networking app, Grindr, approach and engage with a function in the interface called ‘Tribes’. This function allows users to select which Tribe they identify with and to search for others of a specific Tribe, and reference a unique set of subcultures and subgroups replete within the gay community. Through the use of interview data, it becomes clear that Tribes as a function on Grindr’s interface is a very rigid and exclusionary method of expressing one’s identity, and has problematic implications for those exploring their sexual identity. However, participants also described the creative way in which they approach Tribal identity, the deeper connections that it assists them in forging with the community, and the social and cultural importance that Tribes possess. Maffesoli’s conception of neo-tribes assists in unpacking this interesting duality, and highlights that as a form of social/personal identity, Tribes on Grindr are inherently neo-tribal in nature; however, Grindr’s approach to incorporating this form of identity into the interface is at heavy odds with neo-tribalism.

References

  1. Bennett, A. (1999). Subcultures or Neo-Tribes? Rethinking the Relationship Between Youth, Style and Musical Taste. Sociology, 33(3), 599–617.Google Scholar
  2. Birtwistle, G., Moore, C. M., Schofield, K., & Schmidt, R. Ä. (2005). Fashion and Clothing: The Construction and Communication of Gay Identities. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 33(4), 310–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brennan, J. (2015). ‘Bare-backing Spoils Everything. He’s Spoiled Goods’: Disposal and Disgust, a Study of Retired Power Bottom Twink Jake Lyons. Porn Studies, 3(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
  4. Carissa, G. (2008). Rugged. Urban Dictionary. http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=rugged. Accessed 9 Mar 2016.
  5. Cass. (2015). Gay Slang 101. AllMale Blog. http://www.allmale.com/blog/gay-slang-101/. Accessed 9 Mar 2016.
  6. Chauncey, G. (1994). Gay New York: Gender, Urban Culture and the Makings of the Gay Male World, 1890–1940. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  7. Circus, R. (2015). Twink, Bear, Wolf: A Guide to the Types of Gay Men. Rebel Circus. http://www.rebelcircus.com/blog/twink-bear-wolf-a-guide-to-the-types-of-gay-men/1/. Accessed 9 Mar 2016.
  8. Crisp, Q. (1968). The Naked Civil Servant. United Kingdom: Penguin.Google Scholar
  9. Cuirmale. (2016). Gay Leather Fetish History. http://www.cuirmale.nl/history/early.htm. Accessed 9 Mar 2016.
  10. Duende84. (2014). A More Apt Term for “Straight Acting”—Discreet Gay. Empty Closets. http://emptyclosets.com/forum/gender-identity-expression/123799-more-apt-term-straight-acting-discreet-gay.html. Accessed 9 Mar 2016.
  11. Grindr. (2013). Press Release—The New Grindr: Zero Feet Away. www.grindr.com.
  12. Halkitis, P. N. (2001). An Exploration of Perceptions of Masculinity Among Gay Men Living with HIV. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 9(3), 413–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hall, H. I., Song, R., Rhodes, P., Prejean, J., An, Q., Lee, L. M., Karon, J., Brookmeyer, R., Kaplan, E. H., & McKenna, M. T. (2008). Estimation of HIV Incidence in the United States. Jama, 300(5), 520–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Houlbrook, M. (2005). Queer London: Perils and Pleasures in the Sexual Metropolis, 1918–1957. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Maffesoli, M. (1996). The Time of the Tribes: The Decline of Individualism in Mass Society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Manley, E., Levitt, H., & Mosher, C. (2007). Understanding the Bear Movement in Gay Male Culture: Redefining Masculinity. Journal of Homosexuality, 53(4), 89–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McKerron, M. A. (2003). Neo-Tribes and Traditional Tribes: Identity Construction and Interaction of Tourists and Highland People in a Village in Northern Thailand. Graduate School, Chiang Mai University.Google Scholar
  18. MikeD. (2008). What Does Clean Cut Mean. Yahoo Answers. https://au.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080313173200AApQwWU&page=1. Accessed 9 Mar 2016.
  19. Peacock, B., Eyre, S. L., Quinn, S. C., & Kegeles, S. (2001). Delineating Differences: Sub-communities in the San Francisco Gay Community. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 3(2), 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Randomgeekings. (2011). The Gay Geek. Randomgeekings. https://randomgeekings.wordpress.com/2011/12/20/the-gay-geek/. Accessed 9 Mar 2016.
  21. Rickun, J. (2015). Grindr Terminology: Deciphering the Language Used Among Grindr Users. https://storify.com/rickun/grindr-terminology. Accessed 9 Mar 2016.
  22. Russo, V. (1987). The Celluloid Closet: Homosexuality in the Movies (Vol. Rev.). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  23. Scruff. (2015). Scruff Gay Slang Dictionary. http://www.scruff.com/slang/. Accessed 29 Apr 2015.
  24. Taywaditep, K. (2001). Marginalization Among the Marginalized. Journal of Homosexuality, 42(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Torrealba, J. (1998). Got 2b There. Canada.Google Scholar
  26. Westhaver, R. (2005). ‘Coming Out of Your Skin’: Circuit Parties, Pleasure and the Subject. Sexualities, 8(3), 347–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wright, L. (2013). The Bear Book: Readings in the History and Evolution of a Gay Male Subculture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simon Clay
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Sociology, Gender Studies, & Social WorkUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations