Advertisement

‘Shooting the Filigreed Breeze’: Reconsidering Older Men’s Trust Relations in Digital Social Enterprise

  • Lisa McDonald
Chapter

Abstract

Understandings of trust extend beyond its status as tacit or implied, yet the presence or absence of trust in a given situation is difficult to resolve. In dialogue with recent perspectives in critical gerontology that address the experiences of gender and power in older age, this chapter discusses the intersection of trust with a peer support network for older men ‘at-risk-of-suicide’ in regional Queensland, Australia. In particular, it outlines the establishment of a collaborative research project between the University of Southern Queensland (USQ) and The Older Men’s Network (TOMNET) to trial the delivery and facilitation of a digital peer support network. In providing details of both the operational and the social structures of TOMNET, the organisation’s ‘trust philosophy,’ a method of persuading confidence and hope in TOMNET members, is considered foundational to this digital venture. The affective interactions that this philosophy generates foster more than is immediately apparent, extending the notion of trust into what may be termed a ‘digital social enterprise’ to exemplify new-generation civic relations between universities and communities. Anticipating the innovations of this specific human–machine interface, such an enterprise is thought to be a critical nexus of intricately productive relations between gender, a sense of well-being, and experiences of later life in regional Australia.

Keywords

Collaborative research Civic relations Digital social enterprise Older men Trust 

References

  1. Anderson, C. H. (2005). Hobbes, Locke, and Hume on trust and the education of the passions. New England Journal of Political Science, 1(1), 37–85.Google Scholar
  2. Ang, I. (2006). From cultural studies to cultural research: Engaged scholarship in the twenty-first century. Cultural Studies Review, 12(2), 183–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ang, I. (2013). Who needs cultural research? Consortium of Humanities Centres and Institutes. Retrieved from http://chcinetwork.org/about/library/who-needs-cultural-research-ien-ang/
  4. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2012). Causes of death, Australia. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/by%20Subject/3303.0~2012~Main%20Features~Age~10010
  5. Baker, J. (2000). Martin Hollis: Trust within reason. Ethics, 110(2), 418–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bakke, M. (Ed.). (2006). Going aerial: Air, art, architecture. Maastricht: Jan van Eyck Academie.Google Scholar
  7. Bell, V. (1999). Performativity and belonging. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  8. Carter, P. (2005). Mythform: The making of nearamnew at federation square. Carlton, VIC: Miegunyah Press.Google Scholar
  9. Chambers, I. (2008). Mediterranean crossings: The politics of an interrupted modernity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Crowley, V., & McDonald, L. (2015). Affective strategies in the academy: Creative methodologies, civic responses and the market. Social Alternatives, 34(2), 6–12.Google Scholar
  11. Dey, P., & Steyaert, C. (2012). Social entrepreneurship: Critique and the radical enactment of the social. Social Enterprise Journal, 8(2), 90–107. Retrieved from http://www.emeraldinsight.com.ezproxy.usq.edu.au/doi/pdfplus/10.1108/17508611211252828
  12. Frow, J. (2009). Cultural Studies and the neoliberal imagination. The Yale Journal of Criticism, 12(2), 424–430. Retrieved from https://muse.jhu.edu/journals/yale_journal_of_criticism/v012/12.2frow.html
  13. Goddard, J., & Vallance, P. (2013). The university and the city. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington; Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gunasekara, C. (2004). The third role of Australian universities in human capital formation. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 26(3), 329–343. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080042000290186
  16. Hollis, M. (1998). Trust within reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ito, M., Okabe, D., & Matsuda, M. (Eds.). (2006). Personal, portable, pedestrian: Mobile phones in Japanese life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. Jarvenpaa, S. L., Shaw, T. R., & Staples, D. S. (2004). Toward contextualised theories of trust: The role of trust in global virtual teams. Information Systems Research, 15(3), 250–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones, C.A. (Ed.). (2006). The mediated sensorium. In Sensorium: Embodied experience, technology, and contemporary art (pp. 5–49). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kohn, M. (2008). Trust:  Self-interest and the common good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kolb, P. (2014). Understanding aging and diversity: Theories and concepts. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Ling, R. S. (2008). New tech, new ties: How mobile communication is reshaping social cohesion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Lovink, G. (2008). Zero comments: Blogging and critical Internet culture. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Manovich, L. (2013). Software takes command. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  25. Matsuda, M. (2006). Mobile communication and selective sociality. In M. Ito, D. Okabe, & M. Matsuda (Eds.), Personal, portable, pedestrian: Mobile phones in Japanese life (pp. 123–142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  26. McDonald, L. (2014). Discussing the interest in age, vitality and proximity in dispersed regional communities The International Journal of Critical Cultural Studies, 12(2), 21–39. Retrieved from http://ijhccs.cgpublisher.com/product/pub.247/prod.71
  27. McNay, L. (2000). Gender and Agency: Reconfiguring the subject in feminist and social theory. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  28. Menyen, T., & Adair, T. (2013, July). Understanding senior Australians and their communities: Findings from a nationwide survey. Report, National Seniors Productive Ageing Centre, Research Monograph No. 3, Melbourne, VIC.Google Scholar
  29. National Rural Health Alliance Inc. (2009). Fact Sheet 14: Suicide in Rural Australia. Retrieved from http://ruralhealth.org.au/sites/default/files/fact-sheets/fact-sheet-14-suicide%20in%20rural%20australia_0.pdf
  30. Probyn, E. (2005). Blush: Faces of shame. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  31. Probyn, E., & Evers, C. (2010). Introduction: Researching intimate spaces. Emotion, Space and Society, 3(1), 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Saukko, P. (2003). Doing research in cultural studies: An introduction to classical and new methodological approaches. London: SAGE Publications. Retrieved from http://www.cycledoctoralfactec.com/uploads/7/9/0/7/7907144/[paula_saukko]_doing_research_in_cultural_studies_bokos-z1_.pdf
  33. Straubhaar, J., LaRose, R., & Davenport, L. (2013). Media now: Understanding media, culture and technology (8th ed.). Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  34. Swinnen, A., & Port, C. (2012). Aging, narrative, and performance: Essays from the humanities. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 7(2), 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. The Older Men’s Network (TOMNET) Inc. (2013). Community connections program, phase 3. Final report. Toowoomba, QLD: TOMNET.Google Scholar
  36. Warburton, J., Cowan, S., & Bathgate, T. (2012). Building social capital among rural older Australians through information and communication technologies: A review article. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 32(1), 8–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Watson, D., Hollister, R., Stround, S. E., & Babcock, E. (2011). The engaged university: International perspectives on civic engagement. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lisa McDonald
    • 1
  1. 1.Lisa McDonald & AssociatesAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations