Advertisement

Men of Business ‘Pay it Forward’ Program: A Model for Building Social Capital in Disenfranchised Youth in High Schools

  • Lorelle J. Burton
  • Éidín Ní Shé
  • Sue Olliver
Chapter

Abstract

The Men of Business (MOB) ‘Pay it Forward’ programme was established on the Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia, in 2009, by a group of local business owners with the aim of introducing a healthy lifestyle and attitude to marginalised male youth aged 13–17 years. For eight weeks, high school student participants attended weekly one-hour physical workouts, followed by a one-hour mentoring session. Each week, a different MOB mentor volunteered his time to share his story with the MOB boys. This chapter focuses on the lived experiences of the MOB programme from the boys’ and mentors’ perspectives, respectively. The qualitative research findings informed the development of an MOB operating model across five output areas—outcomes relevant to the MOB boys, MOB mentors, school, community and public policy—each with their corresponding social impacts. A logic model for introducing the MOB programme to new schools is also provided. Understanding the full social impacts of the MOB programme requires longer-term tracking of the change process relevant to key stakeholders, specifically the MOB boys and MOB mentors.

Keywords

Disenfranchised youth Alternative education Mentoring programme Disengaged students Community networks 

References

  1. Bankston, C. L., Ravitch, D., Petrilli, M. J., Renzulli, L. A., Paino, M., & Bonastia, C. (2013). Charter schools. Contexts, 12(3), 16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck, E. (2010). Report on educational disengagement of young people under 15 years of age in the Northern Region. Melbourne: Combined Northern Region Youth Connections Consortia.Google Scholar
  3. Berends, M. (2015). Sociology and school choice: What we know after two decades of charter schools. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cameron, M., & MacDougall, C. (2000). Crime prevention through sport and physical activity. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar
  5. Chamberlain, J. (2013). Sports-based intervention and the problem of youth offending: A diverse enough tool for a diverse society? Sports in Society: Cultures, Commerce, Media, Politics, 16(10), 1279–1292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deloitte Access Economics. (2012). The Socio-economic benefits of investing in the prevention of early school leaving. Sydney: Deloitte.Google Scholar
  7. Department of Education, Training and Employment. (2014). Discipline audit executive summary: Helensvale SHS. Brisbane: Department of Education, Training and Employment.Google Scholar
  8. Fujiwara, D., Kudrna, L., & Dolan, P. (2014). Quantifying the social impacts of culture and sport. London: Department for Culture Media & Sport.Google Scholar
  9. Gardner, D. P. (1983). A nation at risk [archived information]. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/risk.html
  10. Henry, K., Knight, K., & Thornberry, T. (2012). School disengagement as a predictor of dropout, delinquency and problem substance use during adolescence and early adulthood. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 41, 156–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Housing Associations’ Charitable Trust. (2014). Measuring the social impact of community investment: A guide using to the wellbeing valuation approach. Retrieved from http://www.affinitysutton.com/media/1169228/Measuring%20the%20Social%20Impact%20of%20Community%20Investment.pdf
  12. Kelly, L. (2013). Sports-based interventions and the local governance of youth crime and antisocial behaviour. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 37(3), 261–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee, S., Cornwell, T., & Babiak, K. (2012). Developing an instrument to measure the social impact of sport: Social capital, collective identities, health literacy, well-being and human capital. Journal of Sport Management, 27(1), 24–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lunn, P., Kelly, E., & Fitzpatrick, N. (2013). Keeping them in the game: Taking up and dropping out of sport and exercise in Ireland. Dublin: ESRI/The Irish Sports Council.Google Scholar
  15. Porter, J. (2000). Alternative education research project: A report examining alternative educational sites and their approaches to working with ‘at risk’ young people. Melbourne: Eltham High School and Diamond Valley College.Google Scholar
  16. Queensland Plan. (2014). A plan for the future: The Queensland Government Response to The Queensland Plan-Education. Retrieved from http://queenslandplan.qld.gov.au/gov-response/delivering-for-qld/assets/education.pdf
  17. Schmitz, N., Kruse, J., & Krugler, J. (2004). The association between physical exercises and health related quality of life in subjects with mental disorders: Results from a cross-sectional survey. Preventive Medicine, 39(6), 1200–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Te Riele, K. (2014). Putting the jigsaw together: Flexible learning programs in Australia-final report. Melbourne: The Victoria Institute for Education, Diversity and Lifelong Learning.Google Scholar
  19. Tolan, P., Henry, D., Schoeny, M., Lovegrove, P., & Nichols, E. (2014). Mentoring programs to affect delinquency and associated outcomes of youth at risk: A comprehensive meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10, 179–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Trotter, L., Vine, J., Leach, M., & Fujiwara, D. (2014). Measuring the social impact of community investment: A guide to using the Wellbeing Valuation Approach. London: HACT.Google Scholar
  21. Vanclay, F. (2003). International principles for social impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 21(1), 5–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wang, M.-T., & Fredericks, J. (2014). The reciprocal links between school engagement, youth problem behaviors, and school dropout during adolescence. Child Development, 85(2), 722–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2010). The spirit level: Why equality is better for everyone. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  24. Wyn, J., McCarthy, G., Wierenga, A., Jones, M., Lewis, A., O’Donovan, R., et al. (2014). Enabling spaces for learning: A knowledge archive and shared measurement framework. Melbourne: University of Melbourne.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lorelle J. Burton
    • 1
  • Éidín Ní Shé
    • 2
  • Sue Olliver
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Psychology and Counselling, Faculty of Health, Engineering and SciencesUniversity of Southern QueenslandToowoombaAustralia
  2. 2.School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health SystemsUniversity College DublinDublinIreland
  3. 3.Library ServicesUniversity of Southern QueenslandToowoombaAustralia

Personalised recommendations