Daily Cycles

Chapter
Part of the Springer Series on Cultural Computing book series (SSCC)

Abstract

The previous chapter focused on the rhythms of the human body at a micro personal scale. In this chapter, we explore the larger macro rhythms of humans interacting with the people and environments in their everyday life. Our discussion draws inspiration from the design processes of architecture and the sociological method of rhythmanalysis. Both these traditions consider rhythmic experience across multiple scales and perspectives, including the intersection between biological, social and political rhythms within human life. They suggest ways that designers can approach creating applications that carefully consider the impact of interactions across multiple users and their associated networks of friends and family. The two traditions also give us some insight into the types of rhythms that can be created when digital technologies resonate alongside the linear and cyclical rhythms of daily life. An interview with award winning online educational designer Simon McIntyre, Director of Learning and Innovation at the University of New South Wales, Australia, serves as a perfect lead into the exploration of the larger macro rhythms of human interaction. Simon McIntyre has designed for a wide range of online educational contexts and talks about the ways in which rhythms of learning intersect with the rhythms of his student’s everyday lives. Following Simon’s interview, we explore processes for understanding the range and qualities of rhythms involved in everyday life. We then look at the rhythms of digital technologies and how they can intersect with, disrupt, augment or blend with these everyday rhythms. We also consider what it might mean to take on board Simon’s key message—to design interfaces that allow people to interact at their own pace and with their own rhythms.

References

  1. Blyth W (2010) Re: Limbo’s completion time—what’s in a length? [Web log post]. Gamasutra. http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/120445/Analysis_Limbos_Completion_Time__Whats_in_a_Length.php. Accessed Apr 2013
  2. Downs J, Vetere F, Smith W (2015) Differentiated participation in social videogaming. Paper presented at the proceedings of the annual meeting of the australian special interest group for computer human interaction, Parkville, VIC, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  3. Edensor T (2012) Introduction: thinking about rhythm and space. In: Edensor T (ed) Geographies of rhythm: nature, place, mobilities and bodies. Ashgate Publishing, FarnhamGoogle Scholar
  4. Juul J (2010) In search of lost time: on game goals and failure costs. In: Fifth international conference on the foundations of digital games, pp 86–91.  https://doi.org/10.1145/1822348.1822360
  5. Juul J, Keldorff R (2010) Depth in one minute: a conversation about bejeweled blitz. In: Davidson D (ed) Well played 2.0: video games, value and meaning. ECT Press, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
  6. Lager D, Hoven BV, Huigen PP (2016) Rhythms, ageing and neighbourhoods. Environ Plann A 48(8):1565–1580.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16643962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lefebvre H (2015) Rhythmanalysis: space, time and everyday life (trans: Elden S, Moore G). Reprint (1992) 2nd edn. Bloomsbury, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Lefebvre H, Régulier C (2015) The rhythmanalytical project. [Original publication 1985] In: Rhythmanalysis: space, time and everyday life. Reprint (1992) 2nd edn. Bloomsbury, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Nansen B, Arnold M, Gibbs MR, Davis H (2009) Domestic orchestration. Time Soc 18(2–3):181–207.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X09338082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Schüll ND (2016) Data for life: wearable technology and the design of self-care. BioSocieties 11(3):317–333.  https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2015.47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Schwanen T, Iv Aalst, Brands J, Timan T (2012) Rhythms of the night: spatiotemporal inequalities in the nighttime economy. Environ Plann A 44(9):2064–2085.  https://doi.org/10.1068/a44494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Slotnik DE (2017) Gamer’s death pushes risks of live streaming into view. The New York Times, 15 Mar 2017Google Scholar
  13. Small C (1998) Musicking. Wesleyan University Press, USAGoogle Scholar
  14. Southerton D (2003) Squeezing time. Time Soc 12(1):5–25.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X03012001001Google Scholar
  15. Vosmeer M, Ferri G, Schouten B, Rank S (2016) Changing roles in gaming: twitch and new gaming audiences. Paper presented at the DiGRA/FDG 2016—Abstract proceedings of the first international joint conference of DiGRA and FDG, Dundee, ScotlandGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of the Arts and MediaThe University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations