Advertisement

Variations on Anātman: Buddhist Themes in Deep Ecology and in Future-Directed Environmental Ethics

  • Gordon F. DavisEmail author
  • Pragati Sahni
Chapter
Part of the Sophia Studies in Cross-cultural Philosophy of Traditions and Cultures book series (SCPT, volume 24)

Abstract

One of the most widely discussed applications of Buddhist ethics in recent years has been in the area of environmental ethics; here the impact of Buddhist ethics extends outside of the fields of philosophy and religious studies, and has made some significant inroads in ecological discourse in the public sphere. Buddhist ecology nonetheless raises difficult metaphysical questions, including many concerning selfhood. We begin with the seminal origins of deep ecology in the work of Arne Naess, who wrote extensively on Indian and Buddhist philosophy; we then consider echoes of his approach in the work of Joanna Macy, whose engagement with Buddhist philosophy is deeper and based on a more extensive familiarity with Buddhist sources. Some awkward philosophical problems attend the particular ways in which these ecologists incorporate versions of the no-self claim. But not all forms of Buddhist environmental ethics are versions of deep ecology. We sketch a style of environmental ethics that seems to follow from the consequentialist approach of two major contemporary Buddhist philosophers, Mark Siderits and Charles Goodman; we call this approach ‘future-directed’ ecology, to contrast it with an ethical view about temporal symmetry that seems implicit in deep ecology. As well as illustrating how far Western philosophers have come in expanding their knowledge of Buddhist philosophy (as illustrated by the work of Siderits and Goodman, among others), this approach shows how diverse the theoretical options are for contemporary Buddhist environmental ethicists.

Keywords

Environmental ethics Deep ecology Anatman Self-realization Speciesism Pratitya-samutpada Dependent origination Consequentialism Reductionism Punctualism Naess Macy Siderits Goodman Spinoza Mahāyāna 

References

  1. Callicott, J. Baird. 2014. Recontextualizing the Self in Comparative Environmental Philosophy. In Environmental Philosophy in Asian Traditions of Thought, ed. Callicott and J. McRae. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  2. Cook, Francis H. 1977. Hua-Yen Buddhism: The Jewel Net of Indra. University Park, Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Davis, Gordon. 2013a. Traces of Consequentialism and Non-Consequentialism in Bodhisattva Ethics. Philosophy East and West 63: 275–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ———. 2013b. Moral Realism and Anti-Realism outside the West: A Meta-Ethical Turn in Buddhist Ethics. Comparative Philosophy 4 (2): 24–53.Google Scholar
  5. de Spinoza, Benedictus. [1677] 1985. The Collected Works of Spinoza, vol. 1. Trans. Edwin M. Curley. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Devall, Bill, and Alan Drengson. 2008. The Ecology of Wisdom: Writings by Arne Naess. Berkeley: Counterpoint.Google Scholar
  7. Fox, Warwick. 1995a. Toward a Transpersonal Ecology. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 1995b. Transpersonal Ecology and the Varieties of Identification. In The Deep Ecology Movement, ed. A. Drengson and Y. Inoue. Berkeley: North Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
  9. Goodman, Charles. 2009. Consequences of Compassion: An Interpretation and Defence of Buddhist Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gowans, Christopher W. 2015. Buddhist Moral Philosophy: An Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Hanner, Oren. 2016. Moral Agency under the No-Self Premise: A Comparative Study of Vasubandhu and Derek Parfit. Doctoral dissertation, University of Hamburg.Google Scholar
  12. Hedden, Brian. 2015. Reasons without Persons: Rationality, Identity and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ives, Christopher. 2009. In Search of Green Dharma: Philosophical Issues in Buddhist Environmental Ethics. In Destroying Mara Forever, ed. J. Powers and C. Prebish. Ithaca: Snow Lion Publications.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 2013. Resources for Buddhist Environmental Ethics. Journal of Buddhist Ethics 20: 2013.Google Scholar
  15. Jonas, Hans. 1984. The Imperative of Responsibility. Trans. D. Herr. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 1998. Pour une éthique du futur. Trans. S. Cornille and P. Ivernel. Paris: Payot-Rivages.Google Scholar
  17. Keown, Damien. 2001. The Nature of Buddhist Ethics, rev ed. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 2007. Buddhism and Ecology: A Virtue Ethics Approach. Contemporary Buddhism 8 (2): 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Macy, Joanna. 1991a. Mutual Causality in Buddhism and General Systems Theory. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  20. ———. 1991b. World as Lover, World as Self. Berkeley: Parallax Press.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 2012. Active Hope. Novato: New World Library.Google Scholar
  22. Naess, Arne. 1989. Ecology, Community and Lifestyle: Outline of an Ecosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. ———. [1973] 1995a. The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement: A Summary. Reprinted in The Deep Ecology Movement: An Introductory Anthology, ed. A. Drengson and Y. Inoue. Berkeley: North Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
  24. ———. 1995b. Self-Realization: An Ecological Approach to Being in the World. In The Deep Ecology Movement, ed. A. Drengson and Y. Inoue. Berkeley: North Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
  25. ———. 1995c. The Systematization of the Logically Ultimate Norms and Hypotheses of Ecosophy T. In The Deep Ecology Movement, ed. A. Drengson and Y. Inoue. Berkeley: North Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
  26. ———. [1977] 2008a. Through Spinoza to Mahāyāna Buddhism, or Through Mahāyāna Buddhism to Spinoza?. In The Ecology of Wisdom: Writings by Arne Naess, ed. B. Devall and A. Drengson. Berkeley: Counterpoint.Google Scholar
  27. ———. [1985] 2008b. Gestalt Thinking and Buddhism. In The Ecology of Wisdom: Writings by Arne Naess, ed. B. Devall and A. Drengson. Berkeley: Counterpoint.Google Scholar
  28. Naess, Arne, and Alastair Hannay, eds. 1972. An Invitation to Chinese Philosophy. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  29. Naess, A., and G. Sessions. 1985. Platform Principles of the Deep Ecology Movement. In Deep Ecology: Living as if Nature Mattered, ed. B. Devall and G. Sessions. Gibbs Smith: Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
  30. Noë, Alva. 2009. Out of our Heads. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  31. Odin, Steve. 1982. Process Metaphysics and Hua-Yen Buddhism: A Critical Study of Cumulative Penetration versus Interpenetration. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  32. Parfit, Derek. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  33. ———. 2011. On What Matters, 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  34. Sahni, Pragati. 2011. Environmental Ethics in Buddhism: A Virtues Approach. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Śāntideva. 1995. The Bodhicaryāvatāra. Trans. K. Crosby and A. Skilton. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Sessions, George. 1994. Deep Ecology for the Twenty-First Century. Boston: Shambhala.Google Scholar
  37. Siderits, Mark. 2000. The Reality of Altruism: Reconstructing Santideva. Philosophy East and West 50 (3): 412–424.Google Scholar
  38. ———. 2003. Personal Identity and Buddhist Philosophy: Empty Persons. Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  39. ———. 2007. Buddhism as Philosophy: An Introduction. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  40. ———. 2016. Does Buddhist Ethics Exist? In In the Cowherds, Moonpaths: Ethics and Emptiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Taylor, Charles. 1989. Sources of the Self. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Thompson, Evan. 2007. Mind in Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Varela, Francisco, Evan Thompson, and Eleanor Rosch. 1991. The Embodied Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  44. Zimmerman, Michael. 1994. Contesting Earth’s Future: Radical Ecology and Postmodernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada
  2. 2.University of DelhiDelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations