Advertisement

Virtual Reality Negotiation Training System with Virtual Cognitions

  • Ding DingEmail author
  • Franziska Burger
  • Willem-Paul Brinkman
  • Mark A. Neerincx
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10498)

Abstract

A number of negotiation training systems have been developed to improve people’s performance in negotiation. They mainly focus on the skills development, and less on negotiation understanding and improving self-efficacy. We propose a virtual reality negotiation training system that exposes users to virtual cognitions during negotiation with virtual characters with the aim of improving people’s negotiation knowledge and self-efficacy. The virtual cognitions, delivered as a personalized voice-over, provide users with a stream of thoughts that reflects on the negotiation and people’s performance. To study the effectiveness of the system, a pilot study with eight participants was conducted. The results suggest that the system significantly enhanced people’s knowledge about negotiation and increased their self-efficacy.

Keywords

Virtual reality Negotiation training system Virtual cognitions 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aymerich-Franch, L., Kizilcec, R.F., Bailenson, J.N.: The relationship between virtual self similarity and social anxiety. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8, 944 (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Banakou, D., Groten, R., Slater, M.: Illusory ownership of a virtual child body causes overestimation of object sizes and implicit attitude changes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(31), 12846–12851 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Banakou, D., Slater, M.: Body ownership causes illusory self-attribution of speaking and influences subsequent real speaking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(49), 17678–17683 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bandura, A.: Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Macmillan (1997)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bandura, A.: Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents 5, 307–337 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bandura, A., Locke, E.A.: Cultivate self-efficacy for personal and organizational effectiveness. In: Handbook of principles of organization behavior, vol. 2, pp. 179–200 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Broekens, J., Harbers, M., Brinkman, W.-P., Jonker, C.M., Van den Bosch, K., Meyer, J.-J.: Virtual reality negotiation training increases negotiation knowledge and skill. In: Nakano, Y., Neff, M., Paiva, A., Walker, M. (eds.) IVA 2012. LNCS, vol. 7502, pp. 218–230. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-33197-8_23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Core, M., Traum, D., Lane, H.C., Swartout, W., Gratch, J., Van Lent, M., Marsella, S.: Teaching negotiation skills through practice and reflection with virtual humans. Simulation 82(11), 685–701 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ding, D.: Negotiation knowledge test: videos, validation data and scoring forms - datasets (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ding, D.: Self-motivation cognitions: validation data and questionnaires - datasets (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Filik, R., Barber, E.: Inner speech during silent reading reflects the reader’s regional accent. PloS One 6(10), e25782 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fox, J., Bailenson, J.N.: Virtual self-modeling: The effects of vicarious reinforcement and identification on exercise behaviors. Media Psychology 12(1), 1–25 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Greco, M., Murgia, G.: Improving negotiation skills through an online business game. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Game Based Learning, pp. 97–104 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    James, W.: The principles of psychology. Read Books Ltd (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Joyce, J.: Ulysses. Editora Companhia das Letras (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kang, N.: Public speaking in virtual reality: Audience design and speaker experiences. Thesis (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kross, E., Bruehlman-Senecal, E., Park, J., Burson, A., Dougherty, A., Shablack, H., Bremner, R., Moser, J., Ayduk, O.: Self-talk as a regulatory mechanism: how you do it matters. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 106(2), 304 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    McConnell, S.R.: Interventions to facilitate social interaction for young children with autism: Review of available research and recommendations for educational intervention and future research. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 32(5), 351–372 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Morin, A., Hamper, B.: Self-reflection and the inner voice: activation of the left inferior frontal gyrus during perceptual and conceptual self-referential thinking. The Open Neuroimaging Journal 6(1) (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chao, Q., Ling, Y., Heynderickx, I., Brinkman, W.-P.: Virtual bystanders in a language lesson: examining the effect of social evaluation, vicarious experience, cognitive consistency and praising on students’ beliefs, self-efficacy and anxiety in a virtual reality environment. PloS One 10(4), e0125279 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Redmond, B.F., Rupp, A.C.: Self-efficacy and social cognitive theories (retrieved, 2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rosenfeld, A., Zuckerman, I., Segal-Halevi, E., Drein, O., Kraus, S.: Negochat: a chat-based negotiation agent. In: Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 525–532. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2014)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sherif, M., Hovland, C.I.: Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change (1961)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Slater, M., Spanlang, B., Sanchez-Vives, M.V., Blanke, O.: First person experience of body transfer in virtual reality. PloS One 5(5), e10564 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Steels, L.: Language re-entrance and the’inner voice’. Journal of Consciousness Studies 10(4–5), 173–185 (2003)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tomlinson, B.: The inner voice: A critical factor in l2 learning. The Journal of the Imagination in Language Learning and Teaching, VI, 26–33 (2001)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vygotskiĭ, L.S., Hanfmann, E., Vakar, G.: Thought and language. MIT press (2012)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wood, J.V., Elaine Perunovic, W.Q., Lee, J.W.: Positive self-statements: Power for some, peril for others. Psychological Science 20(7), 860–866 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yip, B.C.B., Man, D.W.K.: Virtual reality (vr)-based community living skills training for people with acquired brain injury: A pilot study. Brain Injury 23(13–14), 1017–1026 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ding Ding
    • 1
    Email author
  • Franziska Burger
    • 1
  • Willem-Paul Brinkman
    • 1
  • Mark A. Neerincx
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Delft University of TechnologyDelftNetherlands
  2. 2.TNO Human FactorsThe HagueNetherlands

Personalised recommendations